Offroad Tech Discussion pertaining to additions or questions which improve off-road ability, recovery and safety, such as suspension, body lifts, lockers etc
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

IFS travel - who was measured?

Old Dec 30, 2003 | 07:01 PM
  #21  
ravencr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 0
From: Deep Gap, NC
Yeah, but the trail is changin all the time, and having to lock it out while one tire is stuffed and the other drooped wouldn't be good either. It doesn't sound like a good option at all to me.

Chris
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2003 | 09:39 PM
  #22  
Robinhood150's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 3
From: Wandering around Phoenix
So does this mean you've changed your mind about trying to connect the left side to the right side with a bar like in that thread a while ago?

I'm envisioning that one would decide to use it or not use it prior to trying an obstacle, much like the decision to use a locker or not. Anyway, why don't you email elripster about his and see if he likes it.

Edit: Here's a thread about sidehilling.

Here's another thread showing that the front is fully articulated while the back is not. Click.

Last edited by Robinhood150; Dec 30, 2003 at 09:50 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 09:59 AM
  #23  
ravencr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 0
From: Deep Gap, NC
I'll check them out!

Chris
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 08:48 PM
  #24  
ravencr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 0
From: Deep Gap, NC
Ok, here's the problem I have with the air shock system. First off, if you've ever jacked up the entire front end of our 3rd gen 4runners, you'll notice that the shocks are still compressed some even though the downtravel has stopped. This means that the a-arms are maxed out as far as they want to go due to whatever reason. And, if the air shocks are hooked up, one tire is fully stuffed, and the pressure is added to the opposite drooped wheel, then it's going to push the a-arms down further than they are supposed to go resulting in more travel, but also more problems.

I beleive that the only way to increase travel in our IFS rigs is the camburg or Total Chaos kit that includes new a-arms, etc. Otherwise, regardless of shock setup up front, the a-arms rest at the point at which they are maxed out and it wouldn't be good to puch it past that normal equilibrium point.

Chris
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 09:02 PM
  #25  
Robinhood150's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 3
From: Wandering around Phoenix
To solve the over extension problem use a limiting strap.

But cross linking the shocks isn't to increase extension, it's to increase compression. In certain situations the tire that's stuffed isn't going to compress all the way because the spring rate is too great. That, is where the air shocks excel. They allow that compression by effectively reducing the preload on the metal spring and placing it into the air spring (the shock). To illustrate this point, look at Ryan's post above. He said going up hill he measured 9" but going downhill he measured 10".

Of course the only way to increase travel is with a long travel kit, but it still only partially solves the articulation problem. It's still IFS so articulation is still a problem. Yes, you may have 14 inches of travel but you're still going to have a hard time compressing the suspension all the way to the bumpstops. Remember there is a difference between articulation and travel and the air shocks do nothing for travel.

Last edited by Robinhood150; Dec 31, 2003 at 09:05 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 06:51 AM
  #26  
ravencr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 0
From: Deep Gap, NC
Gotcha! I understand it now, and thanks again for the clarification.

Chris
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2004 | 05:30 AM
  #27  
Serith's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Duvall, WA
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but where do you measure your "flex"? is it from your hubs or tires? where is it?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 02:43 PM
  #28  
Cebby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
I was out foolin' today at lunch (had to wait for some contractors to return), so I went and played a little.

I was trying to fully compress the front suspension and I could only get within 1/2" of the bumpstop. The droop was no problem (I have low profile bumpstops). My T-Bars are at stock crank currently.





If I had a winch and heavy bumper out front would that help?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 02:51 PM
  #29  
Cebby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Then a tried a mound for more compression.... Same result.



However, the 33's stuff quite nicely. I guess when I go to 35's, I'll need to "rework" the fenders...

Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 03:01 PM
  #30  
Robinhood150's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 3
From: Wandering around Phoenix
How about sway bars, Mike?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 04:34 PM
  #31  
Cebby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
No front bar at all, rear was connected.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 04:37 PM
  #32  
Cebby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Here's the remnants of Lee's discos - broken rod end and rusty...

Reply
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 08:22 PM
  #33  
Scofco's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,587
Likes: 0
From: Whitehorse, Yukon
I don't have any measurements, but here are some photos:



Reply
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 09:21 AM
  #34  
DevinSixtySeven's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jeff the marmot
Lately I've been impressed with the potential wheel travel numbers from those with aftermarket upper A-arms. And since none of those people have yet destroyed their steering racks from too much angle, I'll probably get either the Camburg or Total Chaos uniball arms this next year. They both claim 9.5"-10" of wheel travel assuming you have a coil-over that can cover that range.
i'm one of those people with uniball ucas plus that sort of coilover, and i'm working on the steering rack . the lower ball joints don't like it much either, the uniball upper is sturdier than the remainder of the ifs, and allowing the control arms to droop to the limit of the misalignment spacers is asking for trouble at the tre and lbj, if you do it a lot. my rack bushings are completely shot, i'm pretty sure the lbjs are hosed, and i need to check the tre bjs as well. going to a poly rack bushing will keep the rack from floating around, but it also means more abuse on the tr.

the donahoes are top of the pile right now for non-diy, but i'd definately recommend a custom coilover and welding on an adjustable limit strap hanger if you know what you're about--adjustable because the straps do plastically stretch over time, or i wouldnt be hanging from the misalignment spacers at full droop right now. that kind of abuse right now means r&r on the lbjs and tres, and some welding before i hit the trails again. all that travel is great, just gotta watch the effect on the other components.

-sean

-sean
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 11:51 AM
  #35  
SEAN_at_TLT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by DevinSixtySeven
i'm one of those people with uniball ucas plus that sort of coilover, and i'm working on the steering rack . the lower ball joints don't like it much either, the uniball upper is sturdier than the remainder of the ifs, and allowing the control arms to droop to the limit of the misalignment spacers is asking for trouble at the tre and lbj, if you do it a lot. my rack bushings are completely shot, i'm pretty sure the lbjs are hosed, and i need to check the tre bjs as well. going to a poly rack bushing will keep the rack from floating around, but it also means more abuse on the tr.

the donahoes are top of the pile right now for non-diy, but i'd definately recommend a custom coilover and welding on an adjustable limit strap hanger if you know what you're about--adjustable because the straps do plastically stretch over time, or i wouldnt be hanging from the misalignment spacers at full droop right now. that kind of abuse right now means r&r on the lbjs and tres, and some welding before i hit the trails again. all that travel is great, just gotta watch the effect on the other components.

-sean
Total Chaos sells a poly mount kit for the rack and they are also about to release a heim steering kit. These two items combined should take care of most of the issues you mentioned. Limit straps are designed to stretch 25% or more, that provides for a soft top-out as opposed to harsh potentially damaging clunk. When installing limit straps, I recommend using clevis adjusters so you can dial in the exact location and makes changes to accommodate new components.

This is our 4Runner stock-width setup...

Jeff,
The TC LT kit does move the lower mount outward, that's how they get away with such low spring rates. The debate between 2.5's and 2.0's depends on your intended usage, for the desert you really wan that extra oil capacity but for the rocks it doesn't really matter as much. We are swapping the 2.5" coil-overs currently on our TC LT Tacoma for 2.0" dual rates and keeping the 2.5" bypasses. This setup should provide the perfect combination of available spring rates and progressive damping to handle almost any situation.

This is our current Tacoma long-travel setup...
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 12:22 PM
  #36  
DevinSixtySeven's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SEAN_at_TLT
Total Chaos sells a poly mount kit for the rack and they are also about to release a heim steering kit. These two items combined should take care of most of the issues you mentioned. Limit straps are designed to stretch 25% or more, that provides for a soft top-out as opposed to harsh potentially damaging clunk. When installing limit straps, I recommend using clevis adjusters so you can dial in the exact location and makes changes to accommodate new components.
that clevis is exactly what i was talking about...forgot the proper term tho :pat:. do you know offhand if their heim steering kit keeps the joint in the same place? one of the guys down here did some experimentation with a a new steering setup, but the bump steer is wicked if the joint moves much. that heim steer would take care of half the joint problems, then theres the lbj...i have the poly bushings sitting in the apartment, but i found out i have to install them to get the performance benefit .

-sean
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 08:30 PM
  #37  
BruceTS's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Wow, almost forgot how old this thread was..... A lot has changed since then, Jeff's been out here in California and has gone wheelin with a bunch of us, unfortunately FearToys 4Runner with the Camburg LT was totaled in a fire.
Jeff did get the Camburg Uniball A-arms.

As for measuring, Jeff and I did some checking out in Hungry Valley


And finally, when I was at home I took a tape measure


Top of the fender is where my tire compresses to and it measured 15 1/2" in the photo....
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 09:28 AM
  #38  
SEAN_at_TLT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by DevinSixtySeven
that clevis is exactly what i was talking about...forgot the proper term tho :pat:. do you know offhand if their heim steering kit keeps the joint in the same place? one of the guys down here did some experimentation with a a new steering setup, but the bump steer is wicked if the joint moves much. that heim steer would take care of half the joint problems, then theres the lbj...i have the poly bushings sitting in the apartment, but i found out i have to install them to get the performance benefit .

-sean
Is that guy down there with the heim steering named Mike? TC's kit is not quite ready for release yet but it is not supposed to affect bumpsteer. As far as the lower ball joint, vertical uni-ball upper and lowers would be nice for long-travel but the turning radius would be affected. Or a fabricated spindle upright with a horizontal uni-ball. That one is still a bit of ahead scratcher...
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2004 | 09:30 AM
  #39  
SEAN_at_TLT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by Serith
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but where do you measure your "flex"? is it from your hubs or tires? where is it?
To measure your vertical wheel travel, go from the center of the hub to the lip of the wheel well on full extension and then again on full compression, find the difference. That is the most accurate measurement.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2004 | 09:12 AM
  #40  
DevinSixtySeven's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SEAN_at_TLT
Is that guy down there with the heim steering named Mike? TC's kit is not quite ready for release yet but it is not supposed to affect bumpsteer. As far as the lower ball joint, vertical uni-ball upper and lowers would be nice for long-travel but the turning radius would be affected. Or a fabricated spindle upright with a horizontal uni-ball. That one is still a bit of ahead scratcher...
that'd be don. are you thinking of mike at offroad warehouse maybe? iirc he was a big help getting the poly bushings for the tundra but i hadnt heard anything about heim steering for a non-LT tundra...gonna ask him and/or TC cuz i could really use that conversion.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:40 PM.