Going to 37"...?
#1
Going to 37"...?
I have a 3.4 in my 4Runner and this next year I will be doing a SAS on it and going to 37". Is there a noticable lose of power and gas milage going from 285's to 37"?
Dennis
Dennis
Last edited by Compass Creek; Nov 27, 2005 at 05:34 PM.
#5
It's all about gears...stay stock and you'll be slower molasses...regear right and it'll be no big deal.
I have a "fresh" 22RE w/ 4.88s and 37/12.50/15 MT/Rs and mine will still accelerate in 5th on a flat, or even slight upgrade, and no problems w/ the other 4 gears whatsoever.
I have a "fresh" 22RE w/ 4.88s and 37/12.50/15 MT/Rs and mine will still accelerate in 5th on a flat, or even slight upgrade, and no problems w/ the other 4 gears whatsoever.
Last edited by waskillywabbit; Dec 3, 2005 at 05:50 AM.
Trending Topics
#12
Originally Posted by Compass Creek
I have a 3.4 in my 4Runner and this next year I will be doing a SAS on it and going to 37". Is there a noticable lose of power and gas milage going from 285's to 37"?
Dennis
Dennis
That said, you will be very pleased with the 529 option with your combination. ZUK
#14
Originally Posted by ZUK
I also agree that 529 will make you happy. Now, just so you know, 37" tires puts you in the range of 571 gears also......you have that excellent OD of .71 I believe so you have "options". The difference between 529 and 571 is only 8% anyways.
That said, you will be very pleased with the 529 option with your combination. ZUK
That said, you will be very pleased with the 529 option with your combination. ZUK
#16
Originally Posted by rockota
I agree w/ Zuk on the gear selection... W/ one small commnent. The 3.4 typically isn't geared as low from the factory than the 3.0. For example, the 31" tire package w/ the 3.0 came w/ 4.88's. The 3.4 came with either 4.10 (4runner) or 3.9 (d-cab) for the 31" tires. That math (w/o a calculator) would get you into the 4.88 range for a 37" tire. But to make up for the extra weight, I'd definitely go 5.29s - I've believed the 3.4 to be slightly under geared anyway.
#17
Originally Posted by tc
I've seen a lot of these type comparisons on here, saying 4.88 with the auto is "better" than 4.56 with the manual...But you can't compare just the diff gearing without considering the ratios in the tranny can you? With the manual, I think there are MUCH lower gears in the tranny than the auto.
#19
Originally Posted by ZUK
If anybody can, I can....just look at my sig...... I run 'em. But now I see he has the 5 speed so none of it applies.
#20
Originally Posted by tc
Maybe that question didn't come across right, Zuk. Is the gearing in the manual transmission significantly lower than the auto? Does 4.56 in the manual tranny and 4.88 in the auto have the same overall gear ratio?



I have 4.88's and 32's and it's a slug!


