Offroad Tech Discussion pertaining to additions or questions which improve off-road ability, recovery and safety, such as suspension, body lifts, lockers etc
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

22R+35's= 5.29 or 5.71

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 03:50 AM
  #1  
Typical Hawaii Toy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: The rainy side of Hawaii
22R+35's= 5.29 or 5.71

Hey hey there! i'm new at this so please don't mind me but... i was wondering.... i have a 1990 Reg.cab Pickup with a 5 speed trani. i'm bout to drop in a fresh 22R. i've got a 4 supsenion and 3 body and i really wanna run 35x12.50 on my 15x12 or 15x10 BUT i don't know what ratio i should get. 5.29 or 5.71? think you guys could help me out a lil? thanks

KOA
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 04:52 AM
  #2  
waskillywabbit's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 20
Welcome to Yotatech.

This gets covered a lot so try searching for varying opinions and then pick one you agree on.

5.29 is as far as I would go IMO.
Check out my website for gears.

Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 05:32 AM
  #3  
Bru's Avatar
Bru
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
I'm running 5.71s with 35s. So far I have not had any problems with a 22r. Another rig with a V6 and 39x15s has destoried 2 sets of gears now. If this is a trail rig you could go either way. If it is a daily driver go with the 5.29s. Everyone says the 5.71s will break easier than the 5.29s. I am not going to be runner much power and plan on going to larger tires at some point. I don't see much pavement in my truck. The 5.71s and 35s is to low for highway use.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 09:57 AM
  #4  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
5.29 would be stock ratio, but doesn't account for the heavier wheel/tire and the increased rolling/air resistance. I would go 5.71 - these engines love to be revved and hate to be lugged. Your clutch will thank you too.

For everyone who says 5.71 will break and 5.29 is OK - how ya figure? You say that 5.71 is weak because the pinion is too small and has too few teeth. Well, guess what - both 5.29 and 5.71 have 7 teeth on the pinion! Since they have the same number of teeth, there is no significant difference in the strength of the pinion.

What IS true us that the lower the ratio, the more critical the setup. You need someone who REALLY knows what they are doing to setup either ratio.

Check out www.gearinstalls.com for more info
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 10:48 AM
  #5  
Bru's Avatar
Bru
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
TC that's good reading at www.gearinstalls.com. It's the first I've seen that. All the other reading I have done (that was years ago) talked about the smaller contact area and it being "guaranteed to break" (Petersen's 4 Wheel & Off-Road). It seemed that all the write-ups felt the same way.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 08:01 PM
  #6  
bigarms23's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 0
From: Kingman AZ
5.29s
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 08:02 PM
  #7  
TOYOTA 1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 3
From: oregon
5:29's
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 09:38 PM
  #8  
dropzone's Avatar
Fossilized
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 19,771
Likes: 456
From: PNW
Originally Posted by Bru
TC that's good reading at www.gearinstalls.com. It's the first I've seen that.
Zuk is the Master...

Personally I would go 15x10s and 5.29's but a lot of people have not broken 5.71's. I used to break 4.10's with 35's due to the weight of my right foot in a past truck...
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 10:32 PM
  #9  
NRandall's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tc
5.29 would be stock ratio, but doesn't account for the heavier wheel/tire and the increased rolling/air resistance. I would go 5.71 - these engines love to be revved and hate to be lugged. Your clutch will thank you too.

For everyone who says 5.71 will break and 5.29 is OK - how ya figure? You say that 5.71 is weak because the pinion is too small and has too few teeth. Well, guess what - both 5.29 and 5.71 have 7 teeth on the pinion! Since they have the same number of teeth, there is no significant difference in the strength of the pinion.

What IS true us that the lower the ratio, the more critical the setup. You need someone who REALLY knows what they are doing to setup either ratio.
X2. This is my experience as well.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 07:05 AM
  #10  
ChickN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
i broke my 5:29's....so now i got 4:37;s....ive got 36's and i am hoping to go to 4:88 some time when i have the money! but to be fair they were Genuine Gears.....if you get some yukon's that are cryod....you should be fine with 5:29's
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 07:29 AM
  #11  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
Originally Posted by ChickN
i broke my 5:29's....so now i got 4:37;s....ive got 36's and i am hoping to go to 4:88 some time when i have the money! but to be fair they were Genuine Gears.....if you get some yukon's that are cryod....you should be fine with 5:29's
Who installed them? What was the backlash and the carrier bearing preload? Crush sleeve or solid spacer?

Could have been that they were Genuine Gears (which hopefully you realized have a lifetime warranty), but could have very likely been the setup and no matter WHAT brand/heat treat condition they would have been toast.

As for cryo ... lemme just say I'm a metallurgist, and AT BEST it's a crutch to fix a bad heat treat operation.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 11:17 AM
  #12  
TOYOTA 1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 3
From: oregon
with out a proper install, all gears/ratios are junk!
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 11:23 AM
  #13  
Conatus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz, CA
I'm running cryo'd 5.29's and 35" Trxus MT's in a 96 with a 4 cylinder. I would not go any lower than that. My revs are at 3000 at 75mph indicated.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #14  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
Those revs may be OK with the 2.7, but will be out of the powerband on the older motors. 5th would be worthless until 80MPH indicated (in my truck anyways)
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 11:57 AM
  #15  
TOYOTA 1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 3
From: oregon
when you say "out of the power band" do you mean before or after?
my 2.7's power band is way lower in rpm's than my 22re's.

anyway, in my truck in 5th gear at around 2700 rpm at about 60mph.
and it pulls 5th just fine until i hit a hill lol, then its 4th gear show.
but im running boggers and they are heavy and have allot of friction drag/wind resistance. i put some 37" radial irocks on and it seemed to have more power.
my point is, that it depends on not only the size but the type of tire also.
if hes just gonna run some regular mud terrains then 5:29's would be more than adequate.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 01:42 PM
  #16  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
I mean the powerband starts at about 3000 RPM on the 22RE and 3VZE. If your RPM's are much below that, you're going to have a hard time holding the gear going up even slight inclines or into the wind.

Obviously, power issues are greatly accentuated here at altitude and especially with my heavy ass 'runner (approx 5200 lbs!), but it just makes the truth more apparent - you need to keep the RPM's over 3000 for happy cruising on anything but flat terrain.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 01:49 PM
  #17  
TOYOTA 1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 3
From: oregon
agreed! though i can take on "slight" inclines in 5th

5200lbs wow! is that the stock weight?

my truck only weighs around 4k, with my 300lb ass, and some heavy tires and winch and blah blah blah.

Last edited by TOYOTA 1; Jan 2, 2009 at 01:51 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 02:37 PM
  #18  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
Nope - not stock ... .188" wall sliders, .120 wall bumpers, dual cases, 2"x0.25" wall lower links, 1.75"x.120 wall uppers, crossmembers, skids ... it weighed 4940 lb before redoing the rear suspension in daily driver mode (full tank of gas, just simple tools, jumper cables, spare, etc) with just me in it ... add Molly, the dog, spare fluids/parts and all the extra steel for the suspension, and I figure 5200 is a VERY safe estimate for 'wheeling.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 02:58 PM
  #19  
muddpigg's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,374
Likes: 37
From: Enterprise, AL
Originally Posted by tc
Those revs may be OK with the 2.7, but will be out of the powerband on the older motors. 5th would be worthless until 80MPH indicated (in my truck anyways)
I totally disagree. Now maybe its do to the RV cam that I'm running but I do very well with 2700rpms in 5th. Pulls great, stock cam had to be revved so down shifting was a must. Still don't know why people run the 268 cam over 260cam. All I can reason is some of the mega gurus recommend them and some folks can't think for themself, just nod and regurgitiate what they were told.

ZUK has done 5.71's with success.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 06:58 PM
  #20  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
Being that the cam pretty well defines the powerband, that would make sense ...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Badfish740
Diesel Swaps
8
Dec 9, 2016 06:18 AM
toyotasaurus
Vehicles - Trailers (Complete)
0
Sep 24, 2015 03:30 PM
justdifferentials
Vendors Build-Ups (Build-Up Section)
0
Sep 5, 2015 06:52 PM
87hoerunner
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
0
Aug 24, 2015 09:49 AM
coffey50
Offroad Tech
17
Jul 28, 2015 10:55 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:17 AM.