Sequoia vs Armada
#3
every one I know that has a full size nissan (3 titan's and 2 armadas) has been disapointed with the vehicle
1) poor warranty service (and needing lots of it)
2) milage way worse than advertised
3) general fit and finish woes (hidden rattles that the dealer can't find)
4) feels week for the amount of advertised HP (seat of the pants
from an parts industry insider POV (myself) Nissan has problems with the parts supply chain and just general support to the dealers from Nissan itself. (most parts take a minumum of 1 week or longer to get versus Toyotas 1 day turn around (if you get the yota order in before cut off, otherwise its 2 days)
from what I've seen Nissans also don't hold there value as well (about like GM in 3 years your 35k+ SUV will only be worth 10K to 15k)
1) poor warranty service (and needing lots of it)
2) milage way worse than advertised
3) general fit and finish woes (hidden rattles that the dealer can't find)
4) feels week for the amount of advertised HP (seat of the pants
from an parts industry insider POV (myself) Nissan has problems with the parts supply chain and just general support to the dealers from Nissan itself. (most parts take a minumum of 1 week or longer to get versus Toyotas 1 day turn around (if you get the yota order in before cut off, otherwise its 2 days)
from what I've seen Nissans also don't hold there value as well (about like GM in 3 years your 35k+ SUV will only be worth 10K to 15k)
#4
Originally Posted by shiftless89
1) poor warranty service (and needing lots of it)
2) milage way worse than advertised
3) general fit and finish woes (hidden rattles that the dealer can't find)
4) feels week for the amount of advertised HP (seat of the pants)
2) milage way worse than advertised
3) general fit and finish woes (hidden rattles that the dealer can't find)
4) feels week for the amount of advertised HP (seat of the pants)
2 people in my family plus a friend of mine own a newer 04+ nissan and all 3 have had their vehicles in the shop on more than one ocassion. I used to think nissan was pretty good but not anymore.
and yeah, the Sequoia does look better and probably has twice the amount of quality/realiabilty that you'd expect.
edit: i still wouldn't mind owning one of these though.
Last edited by rocket; Aug 7, 2006 at 11:41 PM.
#6
Originally Posted by shiftless89
3) general fit and finish woes (hidden rattles that the dealer can't find)
I have ridden in 3 different Armada's and personally didn't notice any issues. I can tell you one thing though: all 3 of them hauled some serious butt. I mean, pin-your-head-in-the-seat power. Oh, and they sound great stock (but even better opened up).

I have no experience with the Toyota.
Last edited by rimpainter.com; Aug 9, 2006 at 06:33 PM.
#7
Wow, I didn't see that Consumer Reports article - good to know. I drove one earlier in the week and it seemed to ride pretty well. No plans for a purchase any time soon though. Hopefully a Sequoia will come around.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tigbucket
99+ Tundra, 00+ Sequoia, 98+ Land Cruiser/LX470
0
Jul 30, 2015 07:29 PM
vanion2
99+ Tundra, 00+ Sequoia, 98+ Land Cruiser/LX470
2
Jul 29, 2015 06:17 PM
Suprarossa
99+ Tundra, 00+ Sequoia, 98+ Land Cruiser/LX470
0
Jul 6, 2015 05:21 AM
FirstToy
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
18
Oct 16, 2003 09:49 AM




