95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Stock Wheels? or Aftermarket?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 06:53 AM
  #1  
SWPERIC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Area
Stock Wheels? or Aftermarket?

SS 1.2 kit and goodridge stainless brake lines (only using the front 2, ss kit comes with rears) arrives in the mail tomorrow! but i work all weekend and its gotta wait till monday

i promise, i have searched so please b merciful if its already out there.

i am getting some 285/75/16 toyo open county all terrains or nittos... still deciding but the size is for sure.

I am weighing the pros and cons of getting aftermarket wheels. I am just building a general purpose 4runner that can handle a little of everything. im not totally sold on the "utility" look of a steal/black rim. my runner still has some decent paint and the stock polished wheels look pretty classy.

I would like to get a little wider track to help with stability now that it will b taller but i wonder if any has had problems like uneven tire wear, destroyed wheel bearings, or anything like that.

so after all that explanation, stock wheels or after market?

also why does everyone stay with 16s and not to something slightly larger? cuz more rubber is more useful then more rim?

thanks all!
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 07:44 AM
  #2  
cackalak han's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
If you're set on getting 285's, I would get an aftermarket set of rims with a 4" backspacing, and in 16x8. However, if it were me, I would get 255/85/16's on stock rims. It's a bit narrower than the 285's, but just as tall. And you won't have issues with rubbing (still might need to trim a little). Also, the difference in track won't be a factor in stability. Read this article. Pretty much answers all of your questions for you.

http://www.expeditionswest.com/resea...tion_rev1.html
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 07:57 AM
  #3  
SWPERIC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Area
steve at sonoran steel offered that option as well. who makes an all terrain in that size?
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 08:10 AM
  #4  
SWPERIC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Area
"Stability and high speed deflection- A narrower tire (and in turn a narrower overall vehicle track width) provides less stability on the road and on cambered trails. In addition, a taller, narrow tire's sidewalls deflect more under severe turning forces, causing the inside of the tires contact patch (midline to the vehicle) to lift (roll in) from the road, increase the chance of a high shear force skid, or loss of control."

yikes.

i totally get this article and will defiantly consider the 255 (tho i have not found alot of companies that make them)

i would still like to see some discussion about the wheels. thanks cackalak han for your input. great article!
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 11:16 AM
  #5  
hurricanes99's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: NC
I have a silver 99 limited and plan to get a set of these in 16 x 8 with the new Kuhmo M/T (265 75 16). Here is a link to the tires and a pic of the rim:
http://www.kumhousa.com/print_specs.jsp?pid=KL71


You guys think they will look good on a silver 4runner??
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 11:35 AM
  #6  
Whitey13's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: MA
Originally Posted by hurricanes99
I have a silver 99 limited and plan to get a set of these in 16 x 8 with the new Kuhmo M/T (265 75 16). Here is a link to the tires and a pic of the rim:
http://www.kumhousa.com/print_specs.jsp?pid=KL71


You guys think they will look good on a silver 4runner??
Those don't come in 16"
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 11:43 AM
  #7  
SWPERIC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Area
they r a little too bling for my taste but to each his own
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 12:12 PM
  #8  
OSU4Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Woodway, TX
Too fancy for off roading IMHO, but its your truck. I do like the rubber though
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 12:40 PM
  #9  
SWPERIC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Area
i guess i should ask my biggest question again. has anyone running 16x8 aftermarket rims with less backspacing then stock had any issues with wheel bearings or steering parts? i almost slide off an exit ramp the other day cuz the highway terrains my runner has r bald as hell. i def need to move on the tire rim thing before chicago snow! yikes!
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 07:19 AM
  #10  
SWPERIC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Area
sry for the bump
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 05:30 PM
  #11  
j-man's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: Santa Monica, Ca
if you have the stock 5 spoke limited wheels then u can run 285's no prob - i am and so are many others - plus they look sweet with a 285 wrapped on em.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #12  
Emt-Iyotaguy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
I am running 16x8's with toyo LT285/75's on them and have absolutly no problems not even any rub but the 3" body lift probably has to do with that
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 08:24 PM
  #13  
Texas_Ace's Avatar
Contributing Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,932
Likes: 1
From: DFW TEXAS BABY!
I would personally (and plan to) powder coat your stock 5 spokes black.

Then get some 1" - 2" spacers and then put those 285's on there.

I plan on doing exactly that, already have the spacers, just need the powerder coating and tires.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 11:36 AM
  #14  
cackalak han's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Pro-comp has plenty of wheels in 16x8 and various spacing options. I don't know of anyone that has had a problem with running 16x8 4" backspacing. Larger tires are more of a culprit of a problem than the wheels.

Also, 285's and wider track won't help with stability, IMO. I mean, we're talking 2-4" of difference of track width and a little bit more rubber. Tire material will be more of a factor here.

255/85's are available from several difference manufacturers and in A/T and M/T. Cooper STT's and BFG KM(2)'s are some of the favorites.

I am not lifted, so I am picking up some BFG KO's in 235/85/16 this week or next. As mentioned in the article, there are pro's to the narrower tires. MPG's being the main factor for me.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flying91
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
45
Apr 11, 2024 04:39 PM
coffey50
Offroad Tech
17
Jul 28, 2015 10:55 AM
1994toyota
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
5
Jul 17, 2015 03:03 AM
DrZero
Tires & Wheels
2
Jul 13, 2015 09:59 AM
Suprarossa
99+ Tundra, 00+ Sequoia, 98+ Land Cruiser/LX470
0
Jul 6, 2015 05:21 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:33 AM.