Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Okay.. thinking of selling now...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2007, 12:07 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
rearviewmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: AUSTEX fiveonetwo
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SC4Runner
Nah I wouldn't worry about that. I think its a common misconception that since the engine is bigger and powerful, it wouldn't use as much gas. Or well, I've heard this come out of peoples mouths.

Its literally impossible to have more power without using more gasoline. Gasoline converts directly into power/energy. The displacement of a v8 cannot beat the fuel economy from a v6 engine.
I average 15-17MPG, I could get that out of an F-250 Turbo Diesel. Direct injection technology makes engines ever more efficient. A 2007 V8 is more fuel efficient than a 2000 V6. The 4Runner is a bit of a turd in the engine department.

Last edited by rearviewmirror; 10-08-2007 at 12:12 PM.
Old 10-09-2007, 07:16 AM
  #22  
Contributing Member
 
4RunnerFever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was tough selling my 98 4runner and with all the mods took about 8 months. So if you've got time, someone will come along. Sweet Tundra!
Old 10-09-2007, 07:45 AM
  #23  
Contributing Member
 
BajaRunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 5th Gen San Diegan, California
Posts: 7,122
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by rearviewmirror
I average 15-17MPG, I could get that out of an F-250 Turbo Diesel. Direct injection technology makes engines ever more efficient. A 2007 V8 is more fuel efficient than a 2000 V6. The 4Runner is a bit of a turd in the engine department.
Ehhh.. I donno about that. But, check the fueleconomy.gov website, they have actual data from people. I really cannot see how a V-8 could physically get more fuel economy than a V-6.

My dad has a 2003 V-8 2wd Tundra. He gets 15 mpg max, and its stock. I get 17 mpg and I have 35's!

I'm not talking about diesels, they are much more efficient.... problem with them is the emissions. I forget, but doesn't a gasoline engine work at about 30% efficiency and a diesel is like 40-50%... less heat is being lost into the atmosphere and used for actual engine power. Pretty cool stuff. Im learning about heat engines right now in my engineering class, I'll get back to you on that one

Last edited by BajaRunner; 10-09-2007 at 07:47 AM.
Old 10-09-2007, 08:35 AM
  #24  
Registered User
 
sdstud212001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hot a$$ PHX
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SC4Runner
Ehhh.. I donno about that. But, check the fueleconomy.gov website, they have actual data from people. I really cannot see how a V-8 could physically get more fuel economy than a V-6.

I think it has everthing to do with gearing, the new tundra has a 6 speed. My father-in-law has one and cruising down the freeway at 70mph the tach is at 1800 RPMs
We recorded avg 16mpg with a best tank of 18mpg from Tucson to LA and back.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedRunner_87
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
84
06-01-2021 01:51 PM
Road Bull
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
23
10-10-2015 04:55 PM
coryc85
Misc Stuff (Vehicle Related)
6
09-09-2015 06:24 AM
GreatLakesGuy
The Classifieds GraveYard
8
09-04-2015 09:27 AM
highonpottery
Buying & Selling Advice - Feeler/Gauging Interest
7
07-18-2015 02:48 PM



Quick Reply: Okay.. thinking of selling now...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:45 AM.