95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

MPG woes seem to be fixed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 09:54 AM
  #1  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
MPG woes seem to be fixed

Since I got my '99 back in November I only had been getting 220-230 a tank with an occassional 240 but never higher. I do have 265/75s and I do get on the throttle so I figured I was stuck with 15mpg all the time and this last week I threw in a new air filter (Puralator) and new clear tinted signal lenses and I got 275 miles (17.9mpg) to the tank which made me quite happy since I didn't alter my driving style one bit. I figured it was a fluke but I got almost 270 from my last one and I'm at a half a tank now and I'm already at 140 miles which before a half a tank would be at 120 if I was lucky.

I had a new filter in it back in November so it must have been the clear signals that did it. I definetly recommend them.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 10:23 AM
  #2  
boogyman's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Talking

haha, congrats! now if only my clear signal lenses added mpg...
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 10:31 AM
  #3  
JETSI's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Va
clear signal = better gas mpg - ok
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 10:33 AM
  #4  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
The new lenses are glass smooth compared to my old lenses which one was cracked so the aerodynamic drag was hurting my mpg I think.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 10:36 AM
  #5  
lee's Avatar
lee
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
From: boston, ma
hah, wow. i too put in a new air filter which increased my mpg by 2 or so, so far.

i get about 240 to the tank, thanks to mostly city driving.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 11:20 AM
  #6  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
I was happy when I hit 240;I drive at 70+ on the 10 mile stretch of highway when I go to work and the rest is generally around town so if I can stay at 17+mpg I'll be content. My mom's a mellow driver in her '99 Limited and she always sees aroud 260 so I figured 240 would be the high point for my truck.
With my '97 5speed I never got less than 270 a tank and I drove that the same way.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 11:44 AM
  #7  
GodwinAustin's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
From: JACKSON
this seagull crapped on my truck the other week - and it must have been a very un-aerodynamic crap because my MPG dropped down to like 12 mpgs until I washed it off!
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 12:03 PM
  #8  
rimpainter.com's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 1
I took the valve stem caps off, reducing the rotational mass of each wheel. You guys should try it too.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 02:06 PM
  #9  
Sherpa's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: McLean, VA
Originally Posted by <96 Runner>
I took the valve stem caps off, reducing the rotational mass of each wheel. You guys should try it too.
LMAO!
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #10  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
If they were TRD valve stem caps you could get more HP tho' and they're more areodynamic.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 06:20 PM
  #11  
GodwinAustin's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
From: JACKSON
Originally Posted by <96 Runner>
I took the valve stem caps off, reducing the rotational mass of each wheel. You guys should try it too.
thats freakin awesome
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:28 AM
  #12  
Sherpa's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: McLean, VA
Originally Posted by X-AWDriver
If they were TRD valve stem caps you could get more HP tho' and they're more areodynamic.
Geez! I am running Wal-Mart special metal-bling caps! Now I know why my economy has dropped by 20%-30%

I'll be right back!

-S
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 06:16 AM
  #13  
Unhappy99's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Probably just your fuel gauge lying to you. Pretty soon you'll have done 270 miles on less than 1/2 tank. Then, without warning, the engine will die while in heavy traffic, and you will be the catalyst for the wrecks.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 06:23 AM
  #14  
lee's Avatar
lee
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
From: boston, ma
you dont determine mpg by your fuel guage. you determine it based on your trip meter and the number of gallons at your next fill up.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 07:18 AM
  #15  
BT17R's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,918
Likes: 1
From: Da Gorge, Oregon
I wonder if it's related to fuel formulation changeover? This is around the time some states switch from oxy-fuel (-10% mileage hit) to standard blend.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 07:39 AM
  #16  
4-RUNNIN' FREAK's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,950
Likes: 0
From: NNJ
Originally Posted by BT17R
I wonder if it's related to fuel formulation changeover? This is around the time some states switch from oxy-fuel (-10% mileage hit) to standard blend.
"Burns cleaner" but you burn more. Gee I wonder. It's probably worse for the environment using the blend.

Last edited by 4-RUNNIN' FREAK; Mar 9, 2005 at 07:41 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 07:43 AM
  #17  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
Yeah,it is about time for the Methanol to be dropped from our gas and that might be the difference.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 07:43 AM
  #18  
ROOFGOOF's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
From: HARFORD COUNTY, Maryland
I wish my tank was larger... I too run around 240 miles per tank, running 265/75/16's BFG's.
My ford has a 29 gal tank... now thats nice! But the diesel prices SUCK!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crammit442
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
7
Nov 29, 2017 12:30 PM
TACOJO
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
8
Nov 27, 2015 05:26 PM
ctheiss
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
17
Sep 8, 2015 09:00 AM
Peevedkitten
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
11
Aug 31, 2015 06:57 PM
accuracy
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
Aug 30, 2015 09:47 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:48 AM.