95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Face it guys, the 2003 Runner is......

Old Jun 24, 2005 | 03:16 PM
  #61  
Keggo's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Bakersfield, CA
"Rise from your grave" you 3 yr. old thread.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 04:03 PM
  #62  
r0cky's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by lee
my views?

just read trunner's info on everything except the 3rd gen. i could not possibly disagree with him more (and ive never once heard a 3rd row of seats in the 3rd gen).

i dont think the 4th gen was a return to offroading at all. but its a great starter truck, like any yota truck before it.
i dunno, even stock it was awesome off-road with the locking center diff
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 07:47 PM
  #63  
trx125's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: Youfalla, Al
I really like the look of your 4th gen Rocky. It looks like it is going to kick some ARSE. I like the look of the older Tacomas 95.5 to 97. (Remember older Taco commercial where it runs over camera and stands over top of it like try something and you will get it again) I guess I will just have to drive my 94 (Arse beater) cause I like the price of it ($2000 ). Just my ramblings for the night!
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 07:51 PM
  #64  
r0cky's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 0
From: Texas
once, MoMo.75 made me a cool avatar and put stars on the sides of my truck and made it look like a military truck.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 08:18 PM
  #65  
BruceTS's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by TRunner
My $0.02....

1st gen: Tough ass trail rig no mater where you go and very basic for easy work on it.

2nd gen: Added luxury from the 1st gen, better on road handleing, not quite the rock crawler of the 1st gen, but deffinately off-roads like a champ.

3rd gen: They geared this one fro the soccor mom. Not as great off-road and too loaded on the inside (3rd row seat and such) to be called a "utility" vehicle.

4th gen: Finally got back to getting it off road but you better have moeny to make it worthy of doing so. Many new complicated things to break, but more solid and more worthy then the 3rd.

All and all the best trail rig remains to be the 1st. The best trail/dd rig remains the second. The best for adding flare is up to the 3rd and 4th generations to battle over, but at least the 4th returned to the off road aspect of things.

(protective flame suit now on)
All of the different versions have their strengths and weaknesses, but I do have to disagree on your belief that a stock 3rd gen is less capable than the 2nd gen. Example the e-locker, better steering, coilover front suspension, the 3.4L engine......

As for the 4ths returning to the offroad aspects, actually they went more to the on-road, no stick shift option, less ground clearance, no e-locker....

Stock vs stock the 1999 sport edition had the most ground clearance and e-locker making it more capable than any of the other editions. To say a shorter wheelbase makes a rig better is a wash, it really depends on the trail.

As for the third row seating, never seen them, but have heard of an aftermarket one being avaliable, but is meant for small children, since the space in the cargo compartment is way too tight.

When it comes to modifying them, the 4th gens are the hardest, for a decent rear bumper you have to cut off part of the frame, to add 35" tires the front frame mount had to be relocated, to add a crawl box, the fuel tank has to be relocated. I wheeled with Lance before and after the ARB rear locker was added, it helped him go places he was never able to go before.

Which edition is the best????? This is in the hands of each and every user on this board, since it really depends on how deep your pockets are. Any one of them can be built into an awesome trail rig.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 09:57 PM
  #66  
marko3xl3's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Has anyone seen that video when someone took an H2 out on a trail where a little part of it is crossing over some medium-sized rocks? Well anyways, when it's the H2's turn to cross, the whole left-front wheel mount just snaps off.

I haven't seen anything like it happen, as I said, the rocks weren't even that big especially not on such a 'tough' vehile .

I am gonna try and find that video now...
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 10:07 PM
  #67  
green91runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
From: thunder bay, ontario
Originally Posted by marko3xl3
Has anyone seen that video when someone took an H2 out on a trail where a little part of it is crossing over some medium-sized rocks? Well anyways, when it's the H2's turn to cross, the whole left-front wheel mount just snaps off.

I haven't seen anything like it happen, as I said, the rocks weren't even that big especially not on such a 'tough' vehile .

I am gonna try and find that video now...
its actually been posted on here about 3 or 4 times.. shouldnt be too hard to find


Originally Posted by Crux
Do 2nd gens come with factory locker?
not that i've ever seen or heard of..

Last edited by green91runner; Jun 24, 2005 at 10:21 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 10:20 PM
  #68  
marko3xl3's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by green91runner
its actually been posted on here about 3 or 4 times.. shouldnt be too hard to find
Yeah, I am not surprised since this is an off-road forum. I am kind of new here so I didn't know, sorry.

But anyways, kind of proves a point there doesn't it . Hummers are made for long-duration desert driving, not hard-core off-roading like 4Runners.

http://www.marko3xl3.com/videos/hummer-wheel.wmv

(for all of you who haven't seen it, and so that I never lose it again )
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 11:35 PM
  #69  
Tacoma Dude's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,345
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by BruceTS
All of the different versions have their strengths and weaknesses, but I do have to disagree on your belief that a stock 3rd gen is less capable than the 2nd gen. Example the e-locker, better steering, coilover front suspension, the 3.4L engine......

As for the 4ths returning to the offroad aspects, actually they went more to the on-road, no stick shift option, less ground clearance, no e-locker....

Stock vs stock the 1999 sport edition had the most ground clearance and e-locker making it more capable than any of the other editions. To say a shorter wheelbase makes a rig better is a wash, it really depends on the trail.

As for the third row seating, never seen them, but have heard of an aftermarket one being avaliable, but is meant for small children, since the space in the cargo compartment is way too tight.

When it comes to modifying them, the 4th gens are the hardest, for a decent rear bumper you have to cut off part of the frame, to add 35" tires the front frame mount had to be relocated, to add a crawl box, the fuel tank has to be relocated. I wheeled with Lance before and after the ARB rear locker was added, it helped him go places he was never able to go before.

Which edition is the best????? This is in the hands of each and every user on this board, since it really depends on how deep your pockets are. Any one of them can be built into an awesome trail rig.


...and THAT ladies and gentlemen pretty much sums it all up!
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 04:32 AM
  #70  
lee's Avatar
lee
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
From: boston, ma
yea bruce did great!
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 04:43 AM
  #71  
shazaam's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,020
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Sherpa
Ted,

I have to disagree on a couple of your comments and correct you on some of your facts. Facts first: The 3rd Gen never offered a 3rd row of seats, in fact, the first and maybe even second year of the 4th Gen didn't have 3rd row seats either, although it is now available.

-S


AAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNN wrong!! Please try again. The third row seating was an available option on a third gen. It was about $900.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 04:45 AM
  #72  
shazaam's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,020
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by marko3xl3
Has anyone seen that video when someone took an H2 out on a trail where a little part of it is crossing over some medium-sized rocks? Well anyways, when it's the H2's turn to cross, the whole left-front wheel mount just snaps off.

I haven't seen anything like it happen, as I said, the rocks weren't even that big especially not on such a 'tough' vehile .

I am gonna try and find that video now...

The guy posts on this board as well. Give any truck enough gas like he did, and it will snap off as well.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #73  
DealMaker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 991
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Cebby
FYI - not sure if you knew. Whitey, who started this thread, DID end up getting an H2. That's why he' not around anymore.
That's a shame. He coulda gotten a 4th gen for probably $20K less. Some people just like the bling a H2 conveys.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bowhunter1640
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
18
Jul 5, 2015 03:30 PM
rwh2toyota
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
13
Jun 27, 2015 05:39 PM
slider417
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
Jun 22, 2015 10:18 AM
JaredL
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
3
Jun 16, 2015 04:47 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:57 PM.