95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Bilstein 5100 Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2015 | 07:51 AM
  #1  
83's Avatar
83
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,591
Likes: 126
From: Montana
Bilstein 5100 Question

I know, there are pages and pages of discussion about these...which is part of the problem. Tons of discussion but without sitting down for a few hours of reading, I haven't seen my question addressed with just skimming.

I'm still happy with my decision to buy these, but for some reason I thought both the fronts and backs were adjustable. But only the fronts are.

Trucks and 4Runners alike have an issue with rear end sag. So what's the thinking behind a built-in method to raise the front, but not rear suspension? I figured I'd keep the front at stock height and just bring up the rear a tiny bit. Instead I'll just be keeping everything stock.

Either way these will be a good upgrade to the truck, but I'm a little dissapointed that the rears aren't adjustable...
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2015 | 09:22 PM
  #2  
SharpStick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Fletcher Hills, CA
It's a design thing.

The perch incorporated on a coil over is what enables that adjustability -adjustable perch = adjustable height. No perch, no adjustability.

The 5100s are great. I run Tundra 5100s on my 4R. With the saggy ass in back, I use OME 891s with OE Dodge 2500 front shocks. Of course - go figure - those OME 891s are slowly sagging. Guess it's a Toyota thing. Gives 'em charm.

STICK
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 05:41 AM
  #3  
skypilot's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 6
From: Peekskill, NY
They ride stiff. I smoke rear shocks every couple of years, the heat just kills them.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 08:39 AM
  #4  
83's Avatar
83
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,591
Likes: 126
From: Montana
Gotcha. I just didn't realize there were so many people interested in raising the front. I like the rear a little higher. But I guess there are compatible with small lifts, so that's part of their popularity.

I just had a shop swap the front coils from the old ones to new ones, so we'll see how it rides one I get the fronts back on & can drive it.
Reply
Old May 10, 2016 | 11:06 PM
  #5  
SharpStick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Fletcher Hills, CA
If you like the back to ride high and don't haul much, the FJ80 front spring swap raises the rear of the 4Runner more than the 890/891 option.

STICK
Reply
Old May 22, 2016 | 11:59 PM
  #6  
wheels&more's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
You can also use OME lift spring for the FJ80. Using springs is a cheap and effective to lift the rear although will sag under load.
Reply
Old May 23, 2016 | 07:36 AM
  #7  
KZN185W's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
with the front at stock height, the rake would be too much if he will use the LC80 springs. I would recommend that the OP install new the 1999-2000 SR5 Highlander Edition rear springs as those will provide a 1-inch lift over the stock height.

Originally Posted by SharpStick
If you like the back to ride high and don't haul much, the FJ80 front spring swap raises the rear of the 4Runner more than the 890/891 option.

STICK
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jashoeuh
Newbie Tech Section
20
Nov 18, 2024 08:08 AM
DeathCougar
Vehicles - Parting Out
54
Apr 1, 2018 11:29 PM
Shagool22
Offroad Tech
1
Aug 14, 2015 12:24 AM
Gevo
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
6
Jul 29, 2015 11:15 AM
gmonnie123
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
Jul 26, 2015 02:44 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:22 AM.