95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

best years of 3 gen?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 05:26 PM
  #21  
turboale's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,868
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
Having been through a water damage "accident". My opnion is the more computers there are, the more there are to get messed up. If your really into 4x4ing... you should know accidents happen. But, personally... i like to feel whats happening and try to fix what is going on in my truck, not some computer. Same with ABS. ABS even is worse on snow and mud than the good old elbow greace. Personally... I would get a 98. Save some cash buying the thing, and get some ARB lockers, a lift and some descent tires and you will be able to do MUCH better than a rear and center "computer controlled" model. And well, i'm not too keen on the whole extra long bumper of the 99+s either. But that is just my .02!!
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 05:27 PM
  #22  
JSharp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Lost in rural Illinois...
Originally posted by rwmorrisonjr
The 99's with the part time 4x4 system had 10" of clearance, while the same with the Multi-Mode system to '02 have 9" of clearance. No idea why, but it must be related to the 4x4 system since its shared with the LC and it only has 9" of clearance.
The part time/fulltime sytem must be the difference then since I remember someone pointing out the part numbers are the same for all the suspension pieces between the two years. I'd guess that would make a 2K truck with a part time system the same as the 99's since all the 4wd parts are identical too...
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 05:29 PM
  #23  
JSharp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Lost in rural Illinois...
Originally posted by Darren
From me. I've measured a number of them (as well as other years). You don't have to take my word for it, though. Go to your nearest dealer if you feel I'm incorrect. I only measured to find out the differences for myself. I already knew that some of the older ones were higher just by watching them come at me down the road. Lots more room under that front diff on the earlier ones, if you pay attention and look, though that isn't the only area that's higher/lower.

I couldn't remember for sure on the spring model numbers. Thanks for clarifying.
This is perplexing. Before I got my truck I looked at a few different ones. One dealer had a 99 and a 2000 model and side by side at least the bumper height was the same. I didn't measure undeneath tho...

Last edited by JSharp; Dec 4, 2003 at 05:31 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 05:30 PM
  #24  
Mad Chemist's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
As of 3 weeks ago, the last time I saw Ducky, he was still trying to find a way to disable it, and was talking to Daryll, a toyata mechanic, to see if Daryll knew anything about it.

I'm not pretending to know all the details about that system, just relaying information from what a couple friends experienced. I guess I was mostly irritated with you making a huge sweeping statement, without initially adding any info to back it up.

Pissing matches over the internet are stupid.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 05:37 PM
  #25  
Darren's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
I agree with you 100% Again, I wasn't arguing. I even included a little smiley in my first post to ease any tension that may have been introduced. I guess I was unsuccessful. I am not one that condones such behavior, especially on this site.

I still remain quite perplexed why Ducky and Millenium are still having a problem with this. Hmm.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 06:02 PM
  #26  
bobzemuda's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally posted by Darren
Yes. Ask Toyota why. I would have to guess different springs are the physical difference, and I'm sure it is due to the rollover safety "issue" which makes them so "unsafe." Good thing you didn't wait for an '03+.
Different springs wouldn't have anything to do with the difference in clearance below the diffs would it?

I was under the impression (though I'd love to be corrected if I am wrong as I'm learning here) that what's above the diff doesn't really have much to do with your resulting clearance, and that the only way to obtain clearance would be to have bigger tires.

Therefore, it would have to be something other than springs that Toyota changed on the '00 models.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 06:07 PM
  #27  
Darren's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
That holds true for a solid axle, such as in the back, but whereas the front is independent, the whole thing is raised up in the center. The lower control arms on the sides wouldn't be raised as much, though. I'm sure a picture would help illustrate the point.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 06:37 PM
  #28  
rwmorrisonjr's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 0
From: Home: Aurora, CO; Work: The People's Republic of Denver
Originally posted by JSharp
Where did the info come from that the 99's are higher?
Also from Toyota itself, look at the specs for the two different 4x4 systems and trim levels:

Base & SR5: part time 4x4, 10"
Limited: Multi-Mode, 9"

Multi-Mode wasn't available on all trim levels until 2001.

I also know from experience as I originally owned a '99 SR5 and a friend had a '99 Limited, and his truck sat an inch lower. Also confirmed by the owner's manuals for that year.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 06:51 PM
  #29  
Darren's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Rich, oddly enough, I've never seen that published. Very interesting. Send me a link sometime if you run across it again, if you would.

Now I know I've measured both Limiteds and SR5's and there has been little variations during each year, and certainly not as much as 1". I've never even thought about the differences between the models (as far as what system it has) when I've gone out, but something for me to look for the next time. I certainly wouldn't think an added differential and 2 computers would weigh the things down that much.

In regards to the following message, thanks, Rich.

Last edited by Darren; Dec 4, 2003 at 07:13 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 07:07 PM
  #30  
rwmorrisonjr's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 0
From: Home: Aurora, CO; Work: The People's Republic of Denver
Darren,

I'll keep my eyes open for it; I remember it being listed in my owners manual for that year. I can't understand the difference either but I think it's due to how the suspension is "slung" and some ride comfort issues. Since the MM system is shared with the LC, the comfort/non-truck ride issue must factor into it somewhere.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 08:02 AM
  #31  
catfan0027's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: KY
I personally would rather have a part time/full time system even if it means losing 1 inch of ground clearence. (won't I get some additional groud clearence if I take of the side step rails?) At least it looks that way on my wife's.

What about larger tires as well, you could get more clearence back with those.

My Jeep only has 8.5 groud clearence, and I have really only got it bottomed out, and stuck one time.

I have a 30 mile commute through 2 different counties and live on a steep hill. when it snows some parts will be really cleared to the pavement and other places will still have snow on it, its nice to just leave in the 4 wheel full time and forget it, than to be worrying about having to shift the part time system, it could get damaged if I do run on some dry pavement.

I also like to use the full time system in heavy rain as well. My jeep cherokee has part time/ full time and I probably leave it in full time about 20% of the time. I only use part time when I am doing the more serious off roading.

Also its much easier when your dealing with women to say 'honey just leave it in 4 wheel full time mode all the time. With part time you have to worry about them forgetting about it, and leaving it in there on the dry pavement. ' at least thats what my wife would probably do...

I am not saying its better, I am just saying for my situation multi mode is better.

But I also want a rear locker. So I guess I was right in figuring it has to be a 99 or 2000 limited.

thanks for all the great info guys.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 08:48 AM
  #32  
Highland Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Highlands, NC
To answer about the thermometer, my wifes 99 limited has one. It might only be included in the upgraded HVAC controls though.
Just wondering about his one inch less grond clearance. Where is this being measured? Just wonder if it might be in the running boards. Aren't the Limiteds running boards different than non Limited? From looking under my wifes 99 with multi mode and comparing to her 98 without; the only difference I could see in the transmission/transfer case was an actulator on back of the multi mode transfer case. I think multi mode is great to have. Haven driven on snow/ice covered roads over the past week , it is a nice option to have.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 09:16 AM
  #33  
Cebby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
The inch less is "probably" measured at the transfer case/crossmember from what I've read in this thread. Running boards aren't down that low, IIRC.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 09:27 AM
  #34  
Darren's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
I believe that is where Toyota "measures" it as the historical 11" mark is close to where the transfer skid plate is. I measure front diff, rockers/pinch weld, transfer case, gas tank and rear diff. You know, everything important relating to ground clearance, and where you want obstacles to stay away from. Measuring at 1 point doesn't mean a whole lot.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 11:08 AM
  #35  
Fink's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
What is the stock height of the 2nd Gen, '95 specifically? I'm just curious, I could go out and measure but I figured somebody would know off the top of their head.

Thanks guys!

Fink
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2003 | 11:27 AM
  #36  
Darren's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
I've only come across two 95's, so I'm not sure how consistent the following numbers are. I haven't measured the transfer case and the gas tank on them yet.

Front diff: 11"
Pinch weld: 19.75"
Rear diff: 9.5"
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jasonty
Pre 84 Trucks (Build-Up Section)
41
Dec 23, 2018 01:00 PM
noahstancik
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
0
Jul 17, 2015 05:38 PM
tpd143
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
1
Jul 7, 2015 09:06 AM
coryc85
Misc Stuff (Vehicle Related)
0
Jul 6, 2015 04:07 AM
CJ94yota
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
2
Jul 3, 2015 10:14 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:27 AM.