95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

22RE Headers....tri-Y or 4-1

Old May 1, 2004 | 12:19 PM
  #1  
deathrunner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,969
Likes: 1
From: San Diego CA
22RE Headers....tri-Y or 4-1

Which header layour will work best for mileage and power increases on a 22RE....Tri-Y or 4 into 1????
Reply
Old May 1, 2004 | 12:41 PM
  #2  
kyle_22r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 4
From: Lacey, WA
i've heard the tri-y is best for torque.
Reply
Old May 1, 2004 | 03:53 PM
  #3  
Glenn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
From: ELN
It depends on what RPM range you are trying to improve. Tri-Y is good for low to mid, and 4 into 1 is good for mid to high RPMs.
Reply
Old May 1, 2004 | 10:06 PM
  #4  
deathrunner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,969
Likes: 1
From: San Diego CA
I imagine for fuel efficiency I want to improve my low end. So tri-Y it is. That is what I thought, but I just wanted a 2nd opinion
Reply
Old May 1, 2004 | 10:41 PM
  #5  
amusement's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
I agree with Glenn's feedback.

A Tri-Y offers good low to mid which means better miles per gallon and slightly more torque. If you haven't already done this, add a cold air intake or a performance K&N air filter (not FIKA) to aid in getting more air to the pistons. Boring the throttle body and porting the plentum would help too. Both are expensive tuning mods that don't add up to dollars vs return of HP/torque/MPG but, don't hurt reliability of your great 22RE.

A cam change offering a greater valve open duration and a 4 to 1 exhaust would make it scream down the highway at higher RPM's add more horse power. But, reliability might suffer in the process.
Reply
Old May 1, 2004 | 11:14 PM
  #6  
tenfourtyeight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Vista, Ca
Tri-Ys are great.
Reply
Old May 2, 2004 | 10:40 AM
  #7  
deathrunner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,969
Likes: 1
From: San Diego CA
Amusement...why do you say not to add the K&N FIPK????
Reply
Old May 3, 2004 | 10:28 AM
  #8  
amusement's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Amusement...why do you say not add the K&N FIPK??? - Deathrunner

I recently learned there is a negative effect on engine performance using an airtake system that takes in any part of the air in the engine compartment. I't something like .3% HP loss for ever degree above 70F @ sea level. An engine compartment makes about 130 - 150F. So you could loose about 18% HP taking in 130F engine compartment air. This info was provided my Holly Performance carbs under the category of air density to increase volume metric effeciency.

I would recommend a high flow air filter taking air from the outside of the engine compartment. wheel well, grill or RAM scoop would increase the air density by taking in cooler air that is 6% higher pressure of atmsophere.

In short cool air, greater volume via performance air filter, slight more pressure (6%) forcing it into the throttle body via scoop or RAM equals more usuable HP. And the best part for your EFI ECU is that it can handle the change without any additional programming or tuning tweaks and no reliability problems. Just be careful about water getting into air instake. Water doesn't compress under the piston without something MAJOR breaking.

Last edited by amusement; May 3, 2004 at 10:35 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JNapolitano
Newbie Tech Section
17
Nov 14, 2019 07:46 PM
Stull
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
9
Aug 28, 2015 05:53 AM
ia02
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
5
Aug 20, 2015 11:04 AM
PlayAwhile
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
5
Jul 20, 2015 11:36 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:01 PM.