95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

2.7L vs. 3.4L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 08:02 PM
  #21  
Trustyrusty's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 1
From: (Rednecks Inbreed In) Kansas
The 22R is a very reliable engine, so is the 3.4 I own both, I like my 22R alot, but my 3.4 has balls, big balls, big hairy man balls. 3.4 FTW!
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 08:24 PM
  #22  
cackalak han's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Friend has a 2.7 Tacoma 5sp that I've driven many times. Definately a very capable truck. Has done very well with everything we've thrown at it. The only downfalls are passing on the freeway (going uphill) and hauling/towing. For those reasons, I am very glad that I have my 3.4. Even with the auto transmission, it feels so much better and hauls with ease. It's well worth the 2-3mpg handicap.

Even if I were to do it over again, I would go with the 3.4. Auto or 5 sp, you can't go wrong.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 08:28 PM
  #23  
Taro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
I've driven all types. And I have to admit I like the 2.7 with a 5spd. I would take a 2.7 over an older 3.0 any day. Just no comparison there. That being said, I own a 3.4 5spd. Not a big fan of any of the automatics and I would rather have a 5spd behind either engine. A 2.7 5spd truck would be a great daily driver. I'm in need of a new pickup. The 4runner is great but sometimes you need a truck. I'm considering getting a 2.7 5spd for that purpose.

Last edited by Taro; Apr 17, 2008 at 08:29 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 09:47 PM
  #24  
JLSpeed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
I've had my 2.7 for 3 1/2 years, and contrary to what everyone is saying, (sorry to be that guy) I wish I'd waited around for a 3.4. I get decent gas mileage, yes, but, I can't stand the fact that I can't maintain 65mph uphill without double downshifting to third. I'd trade the 3mpg difference for the horsepower difference in a second. I'd go 3.4.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 06:23 PM
  #25  
toyotaman_evs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by JLSpeed
I've had my 2.7 for 3 1/2 years, and contrary to what everyone is saying, (sorry to be that guy) I wish I'd waited around for a 3.4. I get decent gas mileage, yes, but, I can't stand the fact that I can't maintain 65mph uphill without double downshifting to third. I'd trade the 3mpg difference for the horsepower difference in a second. I'd go 3.4.
Hey that's why I started this thread I wanna know, learn from others. I've been looking at trucks and most are 3.4L I've found only one 2.7L. A guy I used to work with has a '03 2.7L never drove it wish I had.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 09:24 PM
  #26  
Taro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by JLSpeed
I've had my 2.7 for 3 1/2 years, and contrary to what everyone is saying, (sorry to be that guy) I wish I'd waited around for a 3.4. I get decent gas mileage, yes, but, I can't stand the fact that I can't maintain 65mph uphill without double downshifting to third. I'd trade the 3mpg difference for the horsepower difference in a second. I'd go 3.4.
look at his sig. He's running 305's with a 2.7 so take his experience with a grain. What gears does he have. Should be 529's
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 04:02 PM
  #27  
beatenyota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by etan
i've had both the 2.7 and 3.4 and i've liked both engines. 3.4 has more power but the 2.7 is suprisingly strong as well. the 2.7 has quite a bit of torque, and gets 3-5 miles a gallon better. like stated before the 2.7 has a timing chaing and requires less maintenence. both are a definite stepup from the 22r/e and 3.slow.

I second that.


the 2.7 w/ 5speed in my tacoma had enough power with stock tires... with oversize tires it was drastically underpowered

the 3.4 w/ auto in my 4runner I like much better. I would like a manual but the auto is not bad. the ECT button helps control shift timing if i want some more oommf. Fuel mileage.... depends how you drive. "normal" driving, without much hard acceleration I get about 16-20mpg with the 3.4. Upwards of 20mpg on the highway. the 2.7 wasn't much better, as quoted.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 12:42 PM
  #28  
ARB1977's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 365
Likes: 1
From: North Texas
I really love my 3.4L. I get a solid 19 even with the life and tires. I did a 1500 mile tow from Cali to Texas a few years ago and she never skipped a beat.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 01:34 PM
  #29  
TOYOTA 1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 3
From: oregon
Originally Posted by Taro
look at his sig. He's running 305's with a 2.7 so take his experience with a grain.

im running 285's with a 2.7/5spd and it has no problem with pulling itself up hills at 65+mph in 4th gear. and thats with stock 3:90's
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 07:17 PM
  #30  
toyotaman_evs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
I really hoping to find a 2.7L but in my neck of the woods they are not common. I looked at one but it was extremely dirty and the lot it was on was very "shady".
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2013 | 06:19 AM
  #31  
Smelliottkuhn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Food for thought

I have had a 90 4Runner for about 8 years with a 22re and 5 speed tranny. I was bummed about the pick up on steep grades and freeway driving. I threw in a 268 torqr cam from engnbldr, and have had increased pick up. You have to run the valves a little tighter according to his specs, but between 2800-3200 rpm, my engine jumps into a sweet spot--I can cruise uphill in 4th at 65mph.

I am looking at a 99 Taco 2.7L 5-speed today. I thought that I wanted to get a 3.4 for the added ponies, but in the end, I think the reliability and cheaper maintenance of the 2.7 is the way to go.

Unfortunately Engnbldr doesn't make any parts for the 3RZ, but LCE Engineering has a bunch of components to help you get the 2.7 doing more for ya.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2013 | 12:49 PM
  #32  
clayton707's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: concord califorina
the 2.7 is more rare than the 3.4 in the 4x4 trucks, i have a 2.7 in mine totally stock and have had it on the bumpstops hauling stuff and it did fine. and i must mention that it doesnt eat oil like some engines. great engine imho i think toyota really nailed it with this one. and dont let the manifold issue get to you, im almost at 200k and its perfectly intact.


altho sometimes i like to race duramax's and it does lack a little power.
Reply
Old May 8, 2013 | 05:38 PM
  #33  
eds64's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
i love my 2.7 in my tacoma. i bought the truck brand new in 2000. i have 442000 miles on it and never had the valve cover off of it. been a great truck. the only issue i have with it is the knock sensor code. still working on that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ashamsuddin
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
17
Jul 22, 2024 03:59 AM
nvwiggins
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
13
Jun 16, 2016 03:05 PM
LCE_Performance
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:03 PM
mxdw88
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
Sep 20, 2015 03:13 AM
jacked_72
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
1
Sep 14, 2015 03:31 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:15 PM.