95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Is the 2.7 as reliable as the 22re?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 08:57 PM
  #1  
pruney81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 1
From: Leadville Colorado
Is the 2.7 as reliable as the 22re?

I've got an 86 4Runner and I'm looking at some later 90's tacomas. One of the ones I like is a 95 2.7 5 spd. with 142,000 miles. It runs really well and it's quiet. Does anyone have a 2.7 or know of any problems they are prone to having? Also can these go 250-300,000 miles like the 22re or would I be beter off with a 3.4? Paul
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 09:23 PM
  #2  
Nic's Avatar
Nic
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, Alabama
I think the 2.7L is a good engine. I haven't had any complaints. I bought my truck maybe 3 years ago. I have about 127,000 miles on it and it runs like new-not unusual for a Toyota though. I have had to fix nothing on it. My coworker has a 98 Tacoma 2.7L with 135,000 miles on his-runs great. He finally put belts on it last week. It's hard to go wrong with a 4 cylinder. I think if you like the 22R, you will like the 2.7L.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 09:25 PM
  #3  
wrinkled83's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Alstead NH
I have a 2.7 in my coma, The motor has run stong so far with 107k on it, But Ive also had a valve job and a bad injector replaced. It was done under warranty. The biggest problem I have is the Catalytic converter, I have a California truck in New England and to get inspected I can not have a Check engine light on. California trucks come with 2 converters and I can pay $1000. for ea. to fix the problem.
Anyway its decent. If you live outside of Cal. make sure its not from there!
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 04:25 PM
  #4  
pruney81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 1
From: Leadville Colorado
Is there anyone else with a 2.7 out there with anything to add? I heard a 2.7 with a stick is pretty peppy....The one I test drove seemd pretty slow, but I guess it is a 4 cylinder.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 06:14 PM
  #5  
FUZION's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,472
Likes: 0
From: El Paso/Lubbock, Texas
I have a 2.7 with about 170,000. no problems so far, ran it with moblile one synthetic since it was bought, decent power for a 4 cylinder but passing can be an annoyance though. if you hammer it, you'll get through. runs like new...
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 06:31 PM
  #6  
Avsfreak1234's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Estes Park Co
I love my 2.7. Its really a good engine. I bought mine with 126XXX and it still feels new. I flog it whenever I drive and it performs better than my friends V6 Ranger. well, thats not too impressive seein as the 2.7 is a toyota and the V6 is a ford.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 06:46 PM
  #7  
pruney81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 1
From: Leadville Colorado
Yea no kidding my 86 4runner with a 22re passes up ford rangers with ease. When is the timing belt usually supposed to be done on those 60k?
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 07:06 PM
  #8  
superjoe83's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 1
From: Oregon City, Oregon
Originally Posted by pruney81
Yea no kidding my 86 4runner with a 22re passes up ford rangers with ease. When is the timing belt usually supposed to be done on those 60k?
the 2.7 or ford?
the 2.7 uses a chain and should last a very long time
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 12:49 PM
  #9  
wrinkled83's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Alstead NH
The Dealer told me there is no timing chain. All computer.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 02:27 PM
  #10  
Glenn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
From: ELN
Originally Posted by wrinkled83
The Dealer told me there is no timing chain. All computer.
No such thing in any Toyota truck as computer operated valves.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 02:28 PM
  #11  
FUZION's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,472
Likes: 0
From: El Paso/Lubbock, Texas
mine has a timing chain...my acura use to have a timing belt
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 02:29 PM
  #12  
BajaRunner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,122
Likes: 6
From: 5th Gen San Diegan, California
Its a timing belt, not chain, right?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 02:34 PM
  #13  
Tacoclimber's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
From: Between a rock and a hard place, AZ
Having had both (22R and 2.7, as well as the 3.4 I have now) I think the 2.7 is the heir apparent to the 22R. It is a great engine, especially with a stick. The only place you'll feel it is when towing or hauling up a big hill. Other than that, no worries!
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 02:41 PM
  #14  
Nic's Avatar
Nic
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, Alabama
It has a chain.

From what I have read (here I think), the 2.7L is a beefed up version of the 22RE? Correct me if I'm wrong because I really don't know.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 02:47 PM
  #15  
shoblime's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
I've taken a 2.7L apart.... as far as durability, I'm not sure specifically, but this engine has not one, not two, but three timing chains it sure is fun timing them! :pat:
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 03:16 PM
  #16  
rugerm44's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
The manual I looked at shows a number one and number two timing chain.No number three.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #17  
Nic's Avatar
Nic
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, Alabama
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 03:59 PM
  #18  
PygmyCowboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
I don't know how much the older 22re is to the newer 2.4L 2rz-fe, but the 2rz-fe and the 2.7L 3rz-fe seem to have a lot in common. Was wondering where the 3rd chain is also????

Sorry Nic...I'd already did this screenshot when you beat me to the draw!

http://photobucket.com/albums/f75/Py...mingchains.jpg

As a newb, I'm not sure I got the picture thing correct. Sorry if it doesn't show.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 04:04 PM
  #19  
superjoe83's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 1
From: Oregon City, Oregon
Originally Posted by PygmyCowboy
I don't know how much the older 22re is to the newer 2.4L 2rz-fe, but the 2rz-fe and the 2.7L 3rz-fe seem to have a lot in common. Was wondering where the 3rd chain is also????

Sorry Nic...I'd already did this screenshot when you beat me to the draw!

http://photobucket.com/albums/f75/Py...mingchains.jpg

As a newb, I'm not sure I got the picture thing correct. Sorry if it doesn't show.
i believe that the 2rz and 3rz use the same head, and the bore is the same, the blocks are much different between the two, the 3rz has two balance shafts, which are on each side of the crank, (they are driven by the 2nd timing chain), while the 2rz block is more like the 22r in design
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 04:14 PM
  #20  
PygmyCowboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Thanks Joe, I see that now in the diagram. Hope the 2.7L holds up to the 22re in long haul!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:10 PM.