95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

'03 V-8 S/C on the way!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 04:37 PM
  #21  
rowan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
From: maine
wow i read that IRS and was about to go yell at toyota for making an expoler. ...

just goes to show how everything is turning into rich-people-drive-around-town-in-comfort-in-their-fancy-trucks even the 4runner looks like more of a luxury vehile now. but at least it has a solid axle in the back.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 04:40 PM
  #22  
naksukow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Big Bear or Tahoe
To bad you have to drive that new 4Runner around in public.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 04:41 PM
  #23  
Whitey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Maybe it's my age or something but I have no desire to "beef" up a stock 4Runner's engine so that it will haul ass and run like a raped ape. If I wanted a freakin race car I'd buy a car and soup the ˟˟˟˟ out of it. To me, an SUV is for commuting, commuting in ˟˟˟˟ty weather, off roading, camping, and getting most any place you want to get to. Not for street machine type drag racing nonsense.

Reply
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 05:04 PM
  #24  
Mohamed's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
From: Carmichael, CA
Originally posted by Whitey
Maybe it's my age or something but I have no desire to "beef" up a stock 4Runner's engine so that it will haul ass and run like a raped ape. If I wanted a freakin race car I'd buy a car and soup the ˟˟˟˟ out of it. To me, an SUV is for commuting, commuting in ˟˟˟˟ty weather, off roading, camping, and getting most any place you want to get to. Not for street machine type drag racing nonsense.

actually what I have seen a lot of times in the s/c ad's is that they mention greater torque and horsepower for towing and getting through "tough" situations, I haven't ever really seen a "haul ass" type ad for the S/C, at least for the 3.4L V6 I haven't, same with the 4.7L S/C.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 05:27 PM
  #25  
DH6twinotter's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, North Carolina
I also heard that forced induction (i.e. supercharger/turbo) is good in higher attitude where the air is thinner. That is useful in any vehicle and even more so in trucks.

That's my thoughts on that.
Have fun.
Dh6twinotter
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 05:31 PM
  #26  
sleepy1405's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, HI
actually I like the bigger engine, at the time that I bought a 4runner the horsepower didn't matter, but after comparing it to other cars/suv's/trucks, it's kind of low huh? not even 200 horsepower, i wouldn't mind having a bigger V6 but I don't want a V8 it sucks up too much gas
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 05:58 PM
  #27  
BT17R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,918
Likes: 1
From: Da Gorge, Oregon
There's only 1 mpg difference between the 1GR (V-6) and the 2UZ (V-8) 4X4. Also, the 1GR requires Premium while the 2UZ recommends it. I still run Premium in all my vehicles for the lower abrasive sulphur content anyway. What concerns me more is handling dynamics with the extra 130 lbs. of the 2UZ out front.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 10:57 PM
  #28  
TooEZgoin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
While we are taking about performance, any word on the 03 TRD Headers? are they available? in the works?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nickormerod
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
6
Feb 27, 2008 08:58 AM
derrick92130
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
4
Aug 18, 2003 06:04 PM
ravencr
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
37
Aug 18, 2003 11:47 AM
pfdaxe
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
Jul 22, 2003 09:14 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:05 AM.