3.4 Swaps The 3.4 V6 Toyota engine

What year did the 3.4 change? (A/F)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2010 | 02:36 PM
  #1  
xploded's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
What year did the 3.4 change? (A/F)

I have read in a few places that at some point the 3.4 changed it's method of measuring air/fuel. Something about an extra O2 sensor, and being better for the supercharger. Can someone fill me in on what the change was, and what year and newer engine do I need to look for in a donor for my swap?

Thanks
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 07:51 AM
  #2  
hamish_18's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Junction City, OR
I believe you are talking about the front o2 sensor vs, the newer wideband Air/Fuel sensor. I want to say I read that in 99 the CA ones had the A/F sensor and other states it was an o2 sensor, then from that year on they were all A/F. That may have been in 98 though. If I can find the article I was looking at I will post it.

But all these motors need a 2nd o2 sensor, so the computer can see how well the cat is working. That is all the 2nd one is for. If this is going to be an "off-road" vehicle and not run a cat, then you can make a simple circuit that can fool the computer. There are many rights on how to accomplish this.
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 09:14 AM
  #3  
xploded's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
It will be a street legal vehicle with the cat installed. I do have plans to supercharge it, so I want to get the better engine option. Thanks for the help. I'll be interested to hear if you find that article with the exact date of change.
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 08:51 PM
  #4  
just call me smithy's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 295
Likes: 1
sorry for bringing up an old thread but i have Question,and yes i have searched, i was told by a wrecker that the 5vz was changed and only the newer ones can accept the super charger. is this true? if so what was the cut off year?
Reply
Old May 20, 2010 | 09:54 PM
  #5  
Elton's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,261
Likes: 7
From: Siletz,Oregon
i know 99s have diff maf sensors and from what ive seen accept a s/c better
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 11:36 AM
  #6  
hamish_18's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Junction City, OR
the guy working in the junkyard is there for a reason. NO OFFENSE as I know this doesn't apply to everybody lol. But no, there is not reason why any 3.4 couldn't run a s/c. What he is most likely talking about is the fact that the earlier models had issues unless mods were done. The S/C's would lean out the vehicle at high rpms. The newer models have better fuel injection, therefore helping the lean condition. Also the changed the the better wideband a/f sensor, so the computer can better control the fuel mixture. This is to the best of my knowledge and research on here and other places, so take it with a grain of salt.
Reply
Old May 22, 2010 | 02:47 PM
  #7  
cadman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
The TRD SC will physically fit all 3.4 engines, however the kit is designed for:

'97-'04 Tacomas
'96-'02 4Runners
"97-'98 T100s
'01-'04 Tundras

The engine management electronics of the ECU in pre '97 Tacomas and T100s do not respond well to the sc.

http://www.trdparts4u.com/ProdPDF/TR...020_3400CC.pdf
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2010 | 04:50 PM
  #8  
skunkwhat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Portland Or.
Originally Posted by hamish_18
the guy working in the junkyard is there for a reason. NO OFFENSE as I know this doesn't apply to everybody lol. But no, there is not reason why any 3.4 couldn't run a s/c. What he is most likely talking about is the fact that the earlier models had issues unless mods were done. The S/C's would lean out the vehicle at high rpms. The newer models have better fuel injection, therefore helping the lean condition. Also the changed the the better wideband a/f sensor, so the computer can better control the fuel mixture. This is to the best of my knowledge and research on here and other places, so take it with a grain of salt.

i agree.

If it was me, no matter what year you choose, i would check the air fuels, after the install, be it on the dyno, or an in car, with wideband display.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toyotamonster
3.4 Swaps
7
Apr 16, 2020 06:02 PM
Road Bull
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
23
Oct 10, 2015 04:55 PM
Cplmike
Newbie Tech Section
5
Jul 8, 2015 08:47 PM
HRDC0R19
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
Jul 5, 2015 06:43 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:35 PM.