3.4 Swaps The 3.4 V6 Toyota engine

3.4 Swap - hydrolocked first motor, swapped in new motor, will NOT start! HELP!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 5, 2009 | 03:24 PM
  #1  
ar design's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Parker, CO
3.4 Swap - hydrolocked first motor, swapped in new motor, will NOT start! HELP!

1989 Truck with a 5VZ-FE. First motor and ECU were from a 97 4Runner. Hydrolocked it first time out wheeling :*(

Bought a 98 auto motor (truck is a stick, just threw a couple auto tranny codes but it ran fine). I did not realize the 98 harness was different, so I just plugged it into my 97 ECU. Would not start. Realized harness was different, so I swapped the 97 harness in. But it still will not start. Possible I fried the ECU? Getting fuel and spark, and no OBD2 codes other than the 2 usual tranny codes..... Ideas please?
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 05:04 PM
  #2  
Dan.3's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
From: Tinley Park, IL
possibly grounds. If you havent already I would double or triple check and make sure you have good grounds.
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 05:05 PM
  #3  
ar design's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Parker, CO
Its turning over, and occasionally you can hear it fire, but it wont start. I will check grounds now.....
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #4  
ar design's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Parker, CO
Fooled around with grounds, didnt seem to do anything.

I can pull OBD2 codes etc - any chance the ECU is dead from being attached to that 98 harness that is wired differently?
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 05:58 PM
  #5  
RobD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 5
From: Calgary, AB
I'd ask TMZ on here. He seems to be the most knowledgeable about wiring harnesses and ECUs.
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 06:09 PM
  #6  
ar design's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Parker, CO
I sent him a PM.....
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 08:20 PM
  #7  
Dan.3's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
From: Tinley Park, IL
Is the MAF fried from when you hydro locked it? Possiblity of the ECU being fried but there was another member on here that used a different ecu and harness and everything turned out ok after he rewired the harness. So I would say that its a slim possibility. If you got a significant amount of water into your intake I would say it would take out the MAF. Without the MAF you truck isnt going to run
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 08:21 PM
  #8  
ar design's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Parker, CO
Yeah, i was just thinking about that. found the resistance values, gonna run down and test it right now.....
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 08:35 PM
  #9  
ar design's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Parker, CO
OK, tested per SF28 Toyota document..... Said to check between THA and E2 for resistance - my volt meter had no reading whatsoever for resistance between the two terminals - not 0.00 - just nothing. No reading.

Plugged maf in, tapped VG and E2G, read 1.9V, when I blew thru the MAF it went to 0v or below? Guessing its the MAF, as voltage should climb, not dip, correct?
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 08:42 PM
  #10  
RobD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 5
From: Calgary, AB
Originally Posted by ar design
OK, tested per SF28 Toyota document..... Said to check between THA and E2 for resistance - my volt meter had no reading whatsoever for resistance between the two terminals - not 0.00 - just nothing. No reading.
No reading=open circuit. I'd say your MAF is done.
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 08:43 PM
  #11  
ar design's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Parker, CO
Awesome. Gonna hit up a junkyard tomorrow for one Thanks fellas! Will post with my findings!
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 08:46 PM
  #12  
RobD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 5
From: Calgary, AB
Originally Posted by ar design
Awesome. Gonna hit up a junkyard tomorrow for one Thanks fellas! Will post with my findings!
My posts are not necessarily based in fact, truth, or reality. Take what I say with a grain of salt.

But it's still my guess. If you touch the probes on your meter together, you should get 0.00 as a reading. If you don't, you get a blank screen. Same goes if you probe those two connectors. No reading=open.
Reply
Old May 5, 2009 | 09:15 PM
  #13  
ar design's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Parker, CO
Yes, if the probes touch nothing, blank screen. Touch eachother, 0. I am pretty sure its the MAF. Worse case, $35 out the door, and I know its not the MAF
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 03:34 AM
  #14  
TMZ's Avatar
TMZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Even with a bad maf normally it will start up and shut right down. You need to check and see if it is getting fire. Don't go by how it sounds. Without repinning the harness it is a good chance that the ecu will be damaged when plugging the ecu into the wrong year harness. Check the 7.5amp ign and 15amp efi fuses.
Reply
Old May 10, 2009 | 11:03 AM
  #15  
ar design's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Parker, CO
Ended up being a crank position sensor! Even though I checked resistance.... Guess it must have gone bad sitting at junkyard?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Team420
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
4
Jan 12, 2021 04:57 PM
Goddamnboh
3.4 Swaps
12
May 11, 2016 09:22 PM
vasinvictor
Vehicles - Trailers (Complete)
3
Jan 20, 2016 12:39 PM
Edionne13
Newbie Tech Section
4
Jun 21, 2015 11:37 PM
duckhead
3.4 Swaps
7
Jun 18, 2015 06:54 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:25 PM.