Land Usage & Off Road Responsibility Discussion pertaining to the education of proper land usage, closures, and responsible off road driving

In between a rock and a muddy place...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 12:01 PM
  #61  
4biker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant Grove, Utah
Originally Posted by stormin94
...But if we all started flagging the less obvious pics, I think we will see a sharp decrease in all picture postings on this site. I believe that people will be discouraged to post pics of them(or their rigs) 4x4ing for fear of them being deleted, or flagged as illegal. I think that small changes need to be done soon, then we can see how( or if) they work for our cause. Something needs to be done, but not anything drastic.
I definitely see that point as valid, but in how many instances have you seen pics that are even questionable? Honestly, more than 99% of the content is going to be legit and not have a problem. It's the less than 1% that we're talking about anyway, so it wouldn't discourage me to post pics with a description regardless of worrying if it were going to be deleted by the mods. I consider myself a legit poster, so I wouldn't even worry that a valid, nonillicit thread would be deleted.

Also, I agree with Rocko Toco with his points, but at some point, there is either a policy with some concerns, or no policy whatsoever.

I do not agree with Tacoclimber, however - white OUT.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 12:04 PM
  #62  
04 Rocko Taco's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Tacoclimber
In, of course.
Originally Posted by 4biker
I do not agree with Tacoclimber, however - white OUT.
I actually have to agree with CJ on this one... White IN! (If you have black wheels) Otherwise...Fair game, either way.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #63  
Corey's Avatar
Co-Founder/Administrator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 32,242
Likes: 21
From: Auburn, Washington
I have to agree with 4biker.
I do not see the process here in anyway slowing down the posting of trail tip reports.

Most pictures have always been in legit places.
Only a few have been red flagged in the past by members here.

We have and always will here at YotaTech live to drool all over our keyboards when great scenery is posted.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 08:59 PM
  #64  
stormin94's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 4
From: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
Originally Posted by 4biker
I do not agree with Tacoclimber, however - white OUT.
I'm with you there. Depends on the rig, though.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 10:43 AM
  #65  
4biker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant Grove, Utah
Originally Posted by stormin94
I'm with you there. Depends on the rig, though.
It's obvious that you have been blessed with great clarity and thoughtfulness in regards to tire lettering, but what are your thoughts on policing the forum for inappropriate and/or marginal photos, including illegal mudding, etc?
I don't mean to flame, but I don't to be responsible for steering this thread into (another) meaningless tire quandary. Peace!
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 11:13 AM
  #66  
Tacoclimber's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
From: Between a rock and a hard place, AZ
Originally Posted by 4biker
It's obvious that you have been blessed with great clarity and thoughtfulness in regards to tire lettering, but what are your thoughts on policing the forum for inappropriate and/or marginal photos, including illegal mudding, etc?
I don't mean to flame, but I don't to be responsible for steering this thread into (another) meaningless tire quandary. Peace!
I'm thinking it was a momentary diversion into jocularity.

But you're right. So it seems that it now stands up to the moderators to determine what specific and "official" actions will be taken concerning posts containing illegal activity. However, a portion of the burden of "police work", as it were, will always rest with the membership.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 12:07 PM
  #67  
WATRD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
From: Duvall, WA
Originally Posted by Tacoclimber
But you're right. So it seems that it now stands up to the moderators to determine what specific and "official" actions will be taken concerning posts containing illegal activity. However, a portion of the burden of "police work", as it were, will always rest with the membership.
The issue is being discussed among the mods, but we have a strong desire to make the process/rule/regulation reflect the desires of the membership. The staff have strong reasons behind not wanting illegal activities on the forum, but how to go about accomplishing that is open to discussion and input.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 02:26 PM
  #68  
stormin94's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 4
From: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
Originally Posted by 4biker
It's obvious that you have been blessed with great clarity and thoughtfulness in regards to tire lettering, but what are your thoughts on policing the forum for inappropriate and/or marginal photos, including illegal mudding, etc?
I don't mean to flame, but I don't to be responsible for steering this thread into (another) meaningless tire quandary. Peace!
I posted posted my stance already, I thought it was getting off topic, but nonetheless, I wanted to join in the fun(I'm a terrible person, but I can live with that) But, back to business, Illegal wheeling is horrble, and irresponsible. Legal wheeling is fun, and recreational. People with pictures of the legal wheeling should be kept, illegal one's should be flagged. I think before we go around deleting every illegal post(depending on how BAD it is) I think we should give the poster of the pic a chance to remove it himself(or herself). I think 2 hours time is adequate for the poster to come forward and remove the picture themselves, and then every one is happy(except for the poster, maybe, but it could be worse for them) What do you guys think of the Idea(just the idea of sending the posters of marginally illegal, not full blown illegal activities, a notice telling them to delete the post, rather than have it deleted by a member of the staff) So, what do you guys(and gals) think????
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 03:53 PM
  #69  
Tacoclimber's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
From: Between a rock and a hard place, AZ
Originally Posted by stormin94
I posted posted my stance already, I thought it was getting off topic, but nonetheless, I wanted to join in the fun(I'm a terrible person, but I can live with that) But, back to business, Illegal wheeling is horrble, and irresponsible. Legal wheeling is fun, and recreational. People with pictures of the legal wheeling should be kept, illegal one's should be flagged. I think before we go around deleting every illegal post(depending on how BAD it is) I think we should give the poster of the pic a chance to remove it himself(or herself). I think 2 hours time is adequate for the poster to come forward and remove the picture themselves, and then every one is happy(except for the poster, maybe, but it could be worse for them) What do you guys think of the Idea(just the idea of sending the posters of marginally illegal, not full blown illegal activities, a notice telling them to delete the post, rather than have it deleted by a member of the staff) So, what do you guys(and gals) think????
I think the idea has merit, but any arbitrary time frame to remove a questionable picture will have some potential argument against it. 2 hours is pretty reasonable. Then again, you will have those who post something and then don't log in again for another day, and then find their pic deleted. Of course, if things are made clear for all the membership, then there really is no reason to get wadded up over it.

Of course, this is in fact all theoretical at this point.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 03:59 PM
  #70  
stormin94's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 4
From: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
Originally Posted by Tacoclimber
I think the idea has merit, but any arbitrary time frame to remove a questionable picture will have some potential argument against it. 2 hours is pretty reasonable. Then again, you will have those who post something and then don't log in again for another day, and then find their pic deleted. Of course, if things are made clear for all the membership, then there really is no reason to get wadded up over it.

Of course, this is in fact all theoretical at this point.
We're going to have to compromise if we want to get anything accomplished... If the staff sends them a message telling them to delete their pic immediately, and gives them a time limit to do so, or it will be deleted by the staff, then if they fail to do so, they have no one to blame but themselves. It's not a perfect idea, but it's a good one to start with.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 04:05 PM
  #71  
Tacoclimber's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
From: Between a rock and a hard place, AZ
Originally Posted by stormin94
We're going to have to compromise if we want to get anything accomplished... If the staff sends them a message telling them to delete their pic immediately, and gives them a time limit to do so, or it will be deleted by the staff, then if they fail to do so, they have no one to blame but themselves. It's not a perfect idea, but it's a good one to start with.
No, I think we're on the same page... I just try to examine all the loopholes someone might try to come up with.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 06:27 PM
  #72  
idayota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Originally Posted by 4biker
I definitely see that point as valid, but in how many instances have you seen pics that are even questionable? Honestly, more than 99% of the content is going to be legit and not have a problem. It's the less than 1% that we're talking about anyway, so it wouldn't discourage me to post pics with a description regardless of worrying if it were going to be deleted by the mods. I consider myself a legit poster, so I wouldn't even worry that a valid, nonillicit thread would be deleted.
well, here's your chance for policy... https://www.yotatech.com/forums/f5/b...k-pics-122647/


oh, and the answer is definitely: white IN....always.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 07:46 PM
  #73  
95RunnerSR5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
From: Vancleave, Mississippi
Originally Posted by idayota
well, here's your chance for policy... https://www.yotatech.com/forums/f5/b...k-pics-122647/
glad i'm not the only one who noticed/reported...wetlands? i mean seriously....
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 07:49 PM
  #74  
04 Rocko Taco's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by idayota
well, here's your chance for policy... https://www.yotatech.com/forums/f5/b...k-pics-122647/


oh, and the answer is definitely: white IN....always.
Originally Posted by 95RunnerSR5
glad i'm not the only one who noticed/reported...wetlands? i mean seriously....
Hey I reported this to ROb too.
Let see that policy at work. Cause I promis wheelin in marsh.wetlands is not what we want the sierra club gettin from us!!!
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 08:51 PM
  #75  
WATRD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
From: Duvall, WA
So... that best stuck thread is a mess...

I see several examples there that cause me to question the legality of what is going on.

So, what is to be done? Shall I butcher the thread, delete the thread or ask folks to report individual posts? I could argue the merits of any of those, along with a few downsides to each.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 09:01 PM
  #76  
Lysmachia's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
From: Clear Lake City, TX
Oe Veh! Well Rob as I pointed out I explained my pictures (on 1st page) but taken out of context they can look horrible - So we really have to be careful when pruning stuff like this - esp if the poster explained why thew picture looks the way it does!
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 09:59 PM
  #77  
idayota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
bare minimum...explanations are in order...possibly even required.

hey, that brings up an idea...is there any way, with all your technological forum savvy, to require a caption for every picture posted on the forum? dont know if this is a good idea or not, but if a caption is required, a little dialog box next to it could remind people to only post legal pictures...it works on myspace...er...sort of.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 10:00 PM
  #78  
idayota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
probably not possible with using the html insert [img] command, huh...didn't think through that one all the way.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 10:22 PM
  #79  
Lysmachia's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
From: Clear Lake City, TX
OOOh But good idear "idayota"!!! If a suspicious pic is not captioned it is fair game to be um... "moderated" neh?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 11:23 PM
  #80  
traben27's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 587
Likes: 2
From: allen tx/provo ut
I just read all 4 pages of this and you guys have a good discussion going on here. Honestly, I think what you have decided is a good policy, to report suspicious threads or simply ask for a background story. However if this policy is put into place, we all need to remember the fact that 99% of the trip reports posted are in legal places and not be "witch hunting" for illegal pictures. Sometimes things can appear a certain way simply because you want it to.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:23 PM.