FJ Cruiser 2007 & on

2007 Fj Cruiser

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 09:37 AM
  #21  
YeloSub7's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
check this out...

CLICK HERE
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 03:41 PM
  #22  
Flamedx4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,291
Likes: 0
From: 100 miles offshore as much as possible, & Springfield Oregon USA
This from there - "What my beef with it is, number one, they put a plastic H2 look alike body on an inferior (compared to the original) platform. "

Cracks me up when I hear stuff like that. No one in their right mind TODAY would EVER buy an FJ40. If you could pull a brand new 1983 FJ out the time machine and test drive compare it with a new ANYTHING, you would walk away and never look back. They were the most uncomfortable, rough riding, hobbyhorsing whiplash inducing, unstable, poor steering, rattly and clanky and drafty contraptions I ever drove. They are not that way today because they are old, they were Always that way. Oh and they got about 8 mpg and were slower than a Yugo. And yes, I drove them Brand New back in the day. I even nearly bought one of the last ones. They were almost worse riding than a CJ. They were however, pretty damned stout and didn't break easily, but then so is a John Deere tractor and I don't want to drive one of those every day either....

Last edited by Flamedx4; Dec 22, 2005 at 03:42 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
justdifferentials
Just Differentials
5
Jun 13, 2022 07:40 PM
TheBFA
Solid Axle Swaps, All Years
8
Feb 15, 2020 06:55 AM
4runnerFireman
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
2
Sep 29, 2015 06:24 AM
Aaronmarston
99+ Tundra, 00+ Sequoia, 98+ Land Cruiser/LX470
0
Sep 22, 2015 09:39 PM
larrys93pickup
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
6
Sep 17, 2015 07:05 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:22 PM.