View Poll Results: what Air filter are you using?
Amsoil



131
25.14%
K&N



179
34.36%
TRD



26
4.99%
Stock Paper



158
30.33%
other



27
5.18%
Voters: 521. You may not vote on this poll
Which air filter?
#82
#83
Originally Posted by evilcow
#84
How many additional miles per gallon could using an aftermarket filter such as K and N or Amsoil provide? I am at 13.3 mpg right now and am wanting to do whatever I can to get this truck up to 17-18 mpg. I have seafoamed and am on the verge of replacing the fuel filter as well.
#85
Originally Posted by theryanator
How many additional miles per gallon could using an aftermarket filter such as K and N or Amsoil provide? I am at 13.3 mpg right now and am wanting to do whatever I can to get this truck up to 17-18 mpg. I have seafoamed and am on the verge of replacing the fuel filter as well.
#86
Originally Posted by evilcow
#87
OEM vs. Amsoil air filter?
Does anyone have any data on filtration and efficiancy on these two filters? Any increase in gas mileage? I have an Amsoil for my new '04 TRD Taco, but after looking @ the test results posted by evilcow here ,
tehttp://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htmsts
I'm starting to reconsider. I am going to deckplate the airbox, but if there's no significant bump in fuel economy with the Amsoil, I'd just as soon be feeding my engine the cleanest air possible. I plan on putting at least 200k on this truck, just like I did with the '93 I just sold. Also, any input on the best time to switch from dino to synthetic would be appreciated. The truck has about 750 miles on it. Thanks for all the great info so far guys.
tehttp://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htmsts
I'm starting to reconsider. I am going to deckplate the airbox, but if there's no significant bump in fuel economy with the Amsoil, I'd just as soon be feeding my engine the cleanest air possible. I plan on putting at least 200k on this truck, just like I did with the '93 I just sold. Also, any input on the best time to switch from dino to synthetic would be appreciated. The truck has about 750 miles on it. Thanks for all the great info so far guys.
#89
I've got a brand new amsoil filter for sale:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...e=STRK:MESE:IT
I'll have a lightly used K&N also for the 3.4L as soon as I pull it out and clean it. It'll come with a new "recharger kit" as well as a partially used one.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...e=STRK:MESE:IT
I'll have a lightly used K&N also for the 3.4L as soon as I pull it out and clean it. It'll come with a new "recharger kit" as well as a partially used one.
#90
Originally Posted by Tacotex
I've got a brand new amsoil filter for sale:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...e=STRK:MESE:IT
I'll have a lightly used K&N also for the 3.4L as soon as I pull it out and clean it. It'll come with a new "recharger kit" as well as a partially used one.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...e=STRK:MESE:IT
I'll have a lightly used K&N also for the 3.4L as soon as I pull it out and clean it. It'll come with a new "recharger kit" as well as a partially used one.
#93
That reminds me. I need to clean my K&N so I better go buy a cheapy stock one for my trip to Houston since I don't have time to clean it before I go. Thanks for the post that reminded me Gadget.
#94
So I had considered a AmSoil filter for my runner, but after talking with my mechanic at Toyota of Escondido, I'm staying with the stock filter.
He told me that the mass air flow meter gets really dirty with aftermarket filters and can cause the engine to run either lean or rich because the MAF gets out of spec really easy.
He said if I get a AmSoil (not to get a K&N), I'll have to take the MAF apart every 5-7k miles and clean the MAF wire.
Nah, I'll keep my stock filter...
He told me that the mass air flow meter gets really dirty with aftermarket filters and can cause the engine to run either lean or rich because the MAF gets out of spec really easy.
He said if I get a AmSoil (not to get a K&N), I'll have to take the MAF apart every 5-7k miles and clean the MAF wire.
Nah, I'll keep my stock filter...
#95
It's a wonder my old 3.0 lasted 200k with the fram oil filters and the K&N air filter I ran on it. I noticed some dirt behind the K&N I just removed from our 4runner, stuck to the face of the rubber airbox seal. That gasket is designed to seal against the smooth plastic frame of the oem filter, not the rubber on the aftermarket ones. If your gonna run aftermarket, it might help to help that seal with a little grease (like on a dirtbike). Wish the good info here had been available years ago. A wise old man once told me to "keep your Toyota ALL Toyota". Wish I'd have listened then
Last edited by Tacotex; Jan 27, 2005 at 07:10 AM.
#96
Bobs real world test
Bob is the oil guy did a "real world test" as he calls it. I am running a K&N and have had no trouble.
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/airfilter/airtest1.htm
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/airfilter/airtest1.htm
#97
I think this conclusion of the filter study stated below speaks to what is really important. Too me it is the protection of the engine from dirt. A high performance filter can ruin your engine. Most of us care about the quality of oil we put in our Toyotas, if you do then putting a high performance filter on your Toyota that lets in more dirt you have canceled any positive effect you provided by going to a synthetic oil. Dirt kills the long term performance/reliablity of any engine.
"Well there is a clear pattern on filtration ability compared to both flow and the type of filtration media used. The "high performance" cotton gauze and foam filters do not filter as well as some have claimed. I actually received an e-mail from K&N stating their filters filter within 99% of the OEM filters. This may be true, and 1% may not sound like much. I contend that 1% over many miles, may be important. Really, it is up to each individual to decide. The poorer flowing filters, remove more particles, and the better flowing filters remove less particles. If you think about it, that conclusion passes any and all common sense tests, so it is not surprising. There are many that will be shocked by the results, that should not be though. I've used high performance filters in the past, and I might again in the future. At the same time, I know that the stock OEM type filters perform very well in filtration and don't inhibit flow nearly as much as some think."
"Well there is a clear pattern on filtration ability compared to both flow and the type of filtration media used. The "high performance" cotton gauze and foam filters do not filter as well as some have claimed. I actually received an e-mail from K&N stating their filters filter within 99% of the OEM filters. This may be true, and 1% may not sound like much. I contend that 1% over many miles, may be important. Really, it is up to each individual to decide. The poorer flowing filters, remove more particles, and the better flowing filters remove less particles. If you think about it, that conclusion passes any and all common sense tests, so it is not surprising. There are many that will be shocked by the results, that should not be though. I've used high performance filters in the past, and I might again in the future. At the same time, I know that the stock OEM type filters perform very well in filtration and don't inhibit flow nearly as much as some think."
#98
Personally I value protection over power. There isn't much but mud at school, so my engine bay gets dirty! Do the math, you want something paper thin to get all the dirt out or do you want something 2"thich? I can't wait to get another amsoil back into my truck.


