Newbie Tech Section Often asked technical questions can be asked here
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Want to improve brakes, what are the options ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 05:40 AM
  #1  
patallen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Quebec,canada
Want to improve brakes, what are the options ?

I never realy liked the brakes on my 86' truck, even after having it all refreshed from A to Z, new calipers, discs, drums, hoses, MC,...The truck needs a major press on the pedal to stop it. I deleted the rear proportioning valve so all the power is there to the rear drums, it is much better but still far from what i would like.

Is there bolt-ons for theses trucks, what are the top rated pads for theses ? or a 3rd generation calipers with more clamping forces ?,...

thanks.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 05:48 AM
  #2  
91diesel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: TN/KY.
use the V6/T-100 front rotors/calipers and it's up in the air about getting the bigger MC or not. I've already got a V6 truck with this and as a further upgrade I'm thinking of getting some late model (96-98 I think will work) rear wheel cylinders which are 1" bore instead of 7/8" like the truck and should provide a little more brake force. You might need the larger MC if you do this. This stuff is the cheap way, there is always rear discs. You'll see a substantial improvement with the V6 rotors and calipers though.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 05:54 AM
  #3  
patallen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Quebec,canada
is this a bolt-on affair on the 4x4 hub ? does the disc are realy needed ?

thanks for the reply !!
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 11:04 AM
  #4  
patallen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Quebec,canada
how come my thread has moved to the newbie section ?
if only newbie watch the newbie section, what its purpose ? how non-newbie will be interested to help...thats not cool.

i am not newbie...altough the question was easy for most of you.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 11:29 AM
  #5  
Matt16's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by 91diesel
use the V6/T-100 front rotors/calipers and it's up in the air about getting the bigger MC or not. I've already got a V6 truck with this and as a further upgrade I'm thinking of getting some late model (96-98 I think will work) rear wheel cylinders which are 1" bore instead of 7/8" like the truck and should provide a little more brake force. You might need the larger MC if you do this. This stuff is the cheap way, there is always rear discs. You'll see a substantial improvement with the V6 rotors and calipers though.

Based on a rudimentary knowledge of physics, I would have thought the smaller the bore, the more braking force, but with more pedal travel... Big bore= high pedal effort + short pedal travel, small bore = long pedal travel + low pedal effort.

Maybe check out the later model brake booster diameter, the bigger it is, the lower the pedal effort.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 12:31 PM
  #6  
patallen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Quebec,canada
Originally Posted by Matt16
Based on a rudimentary knowledge of physics, I would have thought the smaller the bore, the more braking force, but with more pedal travel... Big bore= high pedal effort + short pedal travel, small bore = long pedal travel + low pedal effort.

Maybe check out the later model brake booster diameter, the bigger it is, the lower the pedal effort.
you are right, i am used to work on BMW, i have modified several, and i still own 4, one is a race car, i have played a lot with brake bias and know the basicsof brakes.
I dont want to use the 1" bore MC for my pick-up as it will make the pedal harder. I want to increase pad surface or caliper bores, to the detriment of more pedal travel (more fluid to fill them up).

Anyway, now that i know the V6 calipers are bigger, i may go with this set-up.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 12:36 PM
  #7  
camo31_10.50's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,334
Likes: 4
From: Vian, OK
upgrade your rear brakes dude!!

convert the rear to Disc's, that'll help a lot.

then convert to the bigger disc's and calipers and MC and booster up front!.

my brakes work just fine..i just wish i had ABS....i don't like to lock up my tires on asphalt i try hard not to, but sometimes ya gotta lol...damn cows
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 01:12 PM
  #8  
patallen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Quebec,canada
Originally Posted by camo31"10.50"
upgrade your rear brakes dude!!

convert the rear to Disc's, that'll help a lot.

then convert to the bigger disc's and calipers and MC and booster up front!.

my brakes work just fine..i just wish i had ABS....i don't like to lock up my tires on asphalt i try hard not to, but sometimes ya gotta lol...damn cows
The rear is alredy locking up before the front, i dont want to change the bias too much.

I should have precised that i want to improve on the front only, and reduce overall pedal effort. Converting the rear to disc is costly, this is a utility truck to carry car parts and wood.

Maybe i have shi**ty pads, i would like to know if there is good pads, Hawk does not seem to make some for the 86-89 4 cyl, other pads manufacturer other than raybestos ty ones ?

Last edited by patallen; Jan 8, 2010 at 01:13 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 02:43 PM
  #9  
fooboo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: California
how'd you converted?? sick of tired of drums and squeals too much! and SPRINGS TOO!




Originally Posted by camo31"10.50"
upgrade your rear brakes dude!!

convert the rear to Disc's, that'll help a lot.

then convert to the bigger disc's and calipers and MC and booster up front!.

my brakes work just fine..i just wish i had ABS....i don't like to lock up my tires on asphalt i try hard not to, but sometimes ya gotta lol...damn cows
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 03:08 PM
  #10  
ToyoTech559's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,762
Likes: 1
http://www.trail-gear.com/brake.html
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 03:35 PM
  #11  
patallen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Quebec,canada
Originally Posted by ToyoTech559
thanks for that link, very good !!
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 05:07 PM
  #12  
ToyoTech559's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,762
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by patallen
thanks for that link, very good !!
i have been thinking bout doing the rear disc brake conversion with a larger bore MC.

let me know how the rear goes if you do decide to do it
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2010 | 04:27 PM
  #13  
dfarr67's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 229
Likes: 2
From: Edson, AB, Canada
I was hesitant to go to a 'performance' brake company- but the Hawk HPS on my Chevy are the best I've bought- including ceramics. Hot or cold.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2010 | 10:01 AM
  #14  
abd9810's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Seattle WA
Originally Posted by Matt16
Based on a rudimentary knowledge of physics, I would have thought the smaller the bore, the more braking force, but with more pedal travel... Big bore= high pedal effort + short pedal travel, small bore = long pedal travel + low pedal effort.

Maybe check out the later model brake booster diameter, the bigger it is, the lower the pedal effort.

When you increase the bore size pressure goes down and vice versa... you will notice that the brake pedal has a different pivot point to compensate. This is always addressed with musclecars/hotrods that convert from one brake style/system to another. Most stock GM pedals were drilled for 2 pivot locations depending on application
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2010 | 02:59 PM
  #15  
gary_the_4runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: beaverton, oregon
Originally Posted by patallen
The rear is alredy locking up before the front, i dont want to change the bias too much.

I should have precised that i want to improve on the front only, and reduce overall pedal effort. Converting the rear to disc is costly, this is a utility truck to carry car parts and wood.

Maybe i have shi**ty pads, i would like to know if there is good pads, Hawk does not seem to make some for the 86-89 4 cyl, other pads manufacturer other than raybestos ty ones ?
locking in the rear, before front? not good... you should get a wilwood manual adjust LSPV. are your front brakes even engaging? could have bad front calipers or brake lines
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flying91
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
45
Apr 11, 2024 04:39 PM
chukarhunt
Tires & Wheels
13
Dec 8, 2019 11:39 AM
Yota.Jay
General Electrical & Lighting Related Topics
28
Oct 22, 2015 01:08 PM
RobotMoose
Diesel Swaps
8
Aug 2, 2015 11:00 PM
msane99
Pre 84 Trucks
4
Jul 17, 2015 10:13 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:45 PM.