Newbie Tech Section Often asked technical questions can be asked here
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Mpg 22re - 3.4l

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 07:45 PM
  #1  
coops2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Pagosa Springs, CO
Mpg 22re - 3.4l

I am getting around town about 20mpg, can get 22mpg if I am really easy in my 87 22RE with a 5 speed. If I was to swap in a 97 3.4L 5 speed, how much do you think my MPG would change and which way????????
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 08:18 PM
  #2  
Tofer's Avatar
Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 6
From: Puyallup WA.
if i am easy on the gas i can get 17-19 with my 3.4
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 03:15 PM
  #3  
Fink's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Moved to the Newbie Tech Section.

The section you originally posted this in was a Build-Up Section which is reserved for threads dedicated to a complete build-up of a vehicle.



Fink
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 06:19 PM
  #4  
Sleepr71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Mid-GA
I agree w/Tofer. You will LOSE 3-5mpg going to a 3.4! My '98 X-cab 4x4(3.4/auto) on 255/65/16's is doing good to get 18-19mpg. I guess power takes fuel. Pick your poisen..22RE for good gas mileage(but barely enough power to keep up w/traffic) or 3.4 for "decent" power(enough to actually pass traffic & pull a trailer,etc) + give up 3-5mpg..even more w/ a supercharger.Sleepr71.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2011 | 12:54 AM
  #5  
wyoming9's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,381
Likes: 100
From: I live in New Tripoli Pa out in the woods
Red face

With the 3.4 you will have your foot in it more only because you can.

I don`t think I ever checked the mileage on any of my Toyota`s
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2011 | 01:43 AM
  #6  
Resto-noob's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
From: Cheshire county, NH
My 60 year old father struggled to get 20 with his 3.4. Then again, he also struggled to keep a straight face, as he would shamelessly lead-foot all over the county. Also, I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) that his 98 Tacoma is actually lighter than your 87.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ksmudrunner99
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
6
Aug 7, 2015 06:46 PM
1996Taco
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
Jul 20, 2015 12:02 AM
ryerye13
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
3
Jul 14, 2015 08:27 AM
Seattle_Sign_Guy
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
Jul 12, 2015 12:38 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:32 PM.