Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

V6 vs. 4 Cyl.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2009, 02:15 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
g.king's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V6 vs. 4 Cyl.

I haven't seen a post anywhere on this, but I was wondering, which is better, the V6 or the 4 Cylinder?

I know there has to be pros and cons to each, but I was wanting to know in more detail about each.

If there is a thread about already, please give me the link. Thanks!



3.0 and the 22r's (all variations)

Last edited by g.king; 01-12-2009 at 11:28 AM.
Old 01-08-2009, 02:25 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
scuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 11,338
Received 120 Likes on 59 Posts
Which v6, And which I4...?






Old 01-08-2009, 02:30 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
DragonLTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by scuba
Which v6, And which I4...?






I would assume the 3.0 and the 22R(E,TE)...but you know what happens when you assume...lol
Old 01-08-2009, 02:43 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
lotalucas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ive always loved my 22re. It isn't neccesarily fast but it does it's job and refuses to quit. It's a bit torqy but isn't a race car. although it does seem to be faster than my dads runner which has the 3.0 6, but i think there's something wrong with it. Either way the 22re's easy to work on, rarely needs work, and even if there is something wrong it still will get me up the trail and back home.
Old 01-08-2009, 02:50 PM
  #5  
Contributing Member
 
DudeBud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: WA ,monroe
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by g.king
I haven't seen a post anywhere on this, but I was wondering, which is better, the V6 or the 4 Cylinder?

I know there has to be pros and cons to each, but I was wanting to know in more detail about each.

If there is a thread about already, please give me the link. Thanks!
search.... i know of 2 threads that are about 3 pages long on this subject.
Old 01-08-2009, 05:11 PM
  #6  
tc
Contributing Member
 
tc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The 22RE is generally regarded as bullet-proof and torquey for a 4cyl. It does have it's share of headgasket issues, but is easy to work on and gets good mileage.

The 3VZE has 4 cyl power and gets V8 fuel economy, however, it is very smooth. IMHO, it's unfairly maligned for its headgasket issues. It is a NIGHTMARE to work on, but represents a significant power/torque increase over the 22RE, which is critical in a heavy rig like a 2nd gen 'runner.
Old 01-08-2009, 05:16 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Matt16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
All things considered, unless you place a high value on acceleration (if so, don't buy a 4Runner), the 22RE is probably a better engine. That said, neither engine is perfect.
Old 01-08-2009, 05:18 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
86Toyrunna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: B-TOWN, ORYGUN
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
22RE fan here, they take a licken and keep on ticken..i dont think there is a single person out there ( at least here on yotatech) that will say the 22r's are no good... though i did drive a 3rd gen runner with a 3.4 the other day and made the decision that when my 22re finaly dies that is what will replace it. personaly though.. ditch em both and go for a 1UZ!!
Old 01-08-2009, 05:19 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
89silverpu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sierra Nevada's or the Deserts of Las Vegas
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://www.yotatech.com/forums/f116...s-22re-114231/
Old 01-08-2009, 05:24 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
89needsatranny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yo wont really go wrong.
i blindly purchased my 3.0 not even researching and am fairly pleased. I don't know why people hate but they do. and dont let other people's opinions make up your mind. both are equally good.
Old 01-08-2009, 08:06 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
91Toyota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just get which ever one you want. Both are weak. Both seem fairly reliable. Just get a Toyota
Old 01-08-2009, 08:16 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
just a 22re's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: milwaukee, WI baby muddin in the streets!!
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i have two 22re trucks so with that said my v8 is better!!!! well if i can put both trucks together right?
Old 01-08-2009, 08:28 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Ezrider_92356's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: bismarck nd
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
i say 22re is better, has i believe 20 less hp but is quite reliable and very easy to work on and much better gas millage.
Old 01-08-2009, 08:52 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
chrisbnaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Mesa AZ -> Federal Way, Wa
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I don't have 3.0 Experience, so I can't speak for it.

As for the 22RE..Had mine about 6months so far, it has 225k miles and the cylinder head has never been off. Doesn't burn a lick of oil, doesn't smoke, runs great, plugs always look fine when I check them etc. Power is horrible, but power also breaks . They're a good quality, dependable, mostly bullet proof motor from what I've learned.

I too have decided when the times come for a heart transplant that the runner will most likely recieve a 3.4 as well. That extra power would be really nice to have. I hate having to tach it out to get up a hill.
Old 01-08-2009, 08:56 PM
  #15  
Contributing Member
 
Elton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Siletz,Oregon
Posts: 12,261
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
3.0L are ok if you dont drive them too hard my freind had just a hair over 300k b4 it blew a hg but id still take a 22re anyday
Old 01-08-2009, 09:31 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
a4runnerfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grew up in S.C.V, So Cal.....now in Hampstead, NC
Posts: 4,592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've had 2 3.0 V6's rigs. I'm on my 2nd V6 truck now, and And can I've had no problems with either 1. They've put up with the abuse I've put them thru, flawlessly. The 3.0 does it's issues, more so than the 22re, but I wouldn't give it up. I've put almost 400k on my 1st 3.0 rig, and the rig in my sig has almost 300k. No problems.....yet
Old 01-08-2009, 09:39 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
kinzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Coeur d Alene, id
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i bought my truck because it was a v6, i didnt know why i just knew i didnt want a 4 banger. now im not saying the 22re is bad i just prefer the v6. iv had no problems with it, love the power, and love the way it sounds, im not at all a fan of the ricy 4 cylinder. iv even had guys ask if i had a v8 swap, no joke. im running 185k and still pushing without a single problem. go with the v6
Old 01-08-2009, 09:52 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
LotOMiles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have 420k now on my 3.0 V6. I am not going to say nothing has gone wrong as that is a lot of miles for any engine and parts do have a limit life span. But I got the RPMs up to 5.5k today. I normaly don't like to go past 5k.

And a v6 does have more parts then an i4 and so, is more complex and harder to work on. But then again, you have a easy to change timing belt, over a hard to get at timing chain.
Old 01-08-2009, 11:39 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
abecedarian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Temecula Valley, CA
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by LotOMiles
... >snip< ...
And a v6 does have more parts then an i4 and so, is more complex and harder to work on. But then again, you have a easy to change timing belt, over a hard to get at timing chain.
care to enumerate what the difference in moving parts is between the 22re and 3vze?
You could say two more rods and pistons and 4 more valves, but the 22re has 8 rocker arms that the 3vze doesn't have....
Old 01-08-2009, 11:40 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
chrisbnaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Mesa AZ -> Federal Way, Wa
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pushrod > OHC.

Just sayin.

Thats a whole nother thread though.


Quick Reply: V6 vs. 4 Cyl.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:13 PM.