Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Too much lift?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2006 | 06:52 PM
  #21  
deprunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Fl, tampa
there is no such thing as too much lift.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2006 | 07:01 PM
  #22  
garrett1478's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by deprunner
there is no such thing as too much lift.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2006 | 08:22 PM
  #23  
4x4Lamm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 2
From: Canton, Ohio
Actually, there is, us smart yotatechers know these things.

Lamm
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2006 | 09:30 PM
  #24  
Epic Ed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
My 95 is an automatic and I have a similar set up. 4.88 gearing was perfect for 31x10.50s and barely adequate for the 32x11.50s I'm running now. I will never go with 33" tires without making some other mods first.

For lift I have Downey HD coils (1.5" lift) and 2" spacers in the rear; the front is 1.5" ball joint spacer with a slight torsion bar crank. The lift is just enough for the trails I'm likely to encounter. Going with any more lift and a larger tire will mean I have to change gearing again. I'd rather put the money into an engine swap.

Ed
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 05:27 AM
  #25  
AxleIke's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 6
From: Arvada, Colorado
maybe i'm missing something, but i have a 4banger 22re, and i have 4.88's, and i have 33's...i calculated the gear ratio swap to run 33's, and it came out to 4.77, so 4.88 is still over geared for 33s. Thing drives like a champ, much better than stock. so why is everyone saying that its hardly enough with 32's, when they have more power than i do?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 08:47 AM
  #26  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
I don't know. I think my 4.56's work OK with the 33's. 4.88's might be a little better, but nothing lower than that...Of course the O/D in the automatics is so damn high that may be the problem.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 04:40 PM
  #27  
Epic Ed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
The 2nd gen 4Runner is quite a bit heavier than the 1st gen. My version is heavier than stock due to all the mods and sound proofing so I'm fighting an even greater battle. I have to keep the ECT feature of the tranny on all the time in order to get decent shift points. If ECT is not engaged it's a real dog.

Ed

Last edited by Epic Ed; Feb 6, 2006 at 09:23 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 08:18 PM
  #28  
AxleIke's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 6
From: Arvada, Colorado
ahh, good point, i wasn't thinking of that...the first gens are super light. good call.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dparr2ndgen
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
Sep 8, 2015 01:06 PM
justdifferentials
Vendors Build-Ups (Build-Up Section)
0
Sep 5, 2015 06:52 PM
joeynational
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
Sep 5, 2015 01:54 PM
matthew138
Newbie Tech Section
0
Sep 3, 2015 08:21 AM
Ryall
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
Sep 2, 2015 06:48 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:24 PM.