Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Heated air intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 06:36 PM
  #21  
abecedarian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 6
From: Temecula Valley, CA
Most locale's require a visual inspection (which without the duct, one would fail) as part of their emissions test procedures, and some also require a cold engine emissions test.

So... like said, not having it will not significantly affect the operation of the engine, but without it you won't pass emissions tests.

Hi 'bleeder!
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 06:44 PM
  #22  
iamsuperbleeder's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,248
Likes: 33
From: Lake City, Fl
Originally Posted by abecedarian
Most locale's require a visual inspection (which without the duct, one would fail) as part of their emissions test procedures, and some also require a cold engine emissions test.

So... like said, not having it will not significantly affect the operation of the engine, but without it you won't pass emissions tests.

Hi 'bleeder!
ah very true, didn't take that into consideration...

Hi abe!
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #23  
parkkicks's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Ridgefield WA
huh. well i actually did pass emissions without it
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #24  
Matt16's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by parkkicks
huh. well i actually did pass emissions without it
It would too, if the engine was already warm. I think what Abecedarian meant is that it wouldn't pass the visual.

Last edited by Matt16; Dec 7, 2008 at 07:00 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 07:12 PM
  #25  
abecedarian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 6
From: Temecula Valley, CA
well, it shouldn't pass the visual since it is part of the emissions.
but, what do I know?
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 07:21 PM
  #26  
Matt16's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
They probably don't have a visual in Washington. How the hell does a tech know what to look for on each and every car that comes in, do they have a book that spells it out for them?
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 07:36 PM
  #27  
abecedarian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 6
From: Temecula Valley, CA
heat risers have been standard equipment on nearly every carb'd engine since the late 60's, so ... don't know.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 07:41 PM
  #28  
Matt16's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by abecedarian
heat risers have been standard equipment on nearly every carb'd engine since the late 60's, so ... don't know.
I meant for every single emissions component.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 07:44 PM
  #29  
4runnermt's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by abecedarian
heat risers have been standard equipment on nearly every carb'd engine since the late 60's, so ... don't know.
None of our sixties cars have the heat riser. Our 70 eldorado has one and my old '84 toyota truck had one. Must have been an emissions thing mandated through so many states that test emissions, that it became standardized in the early days. You'd think that an inspector would realize it was missing, but they are a state employee. Go figure!
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 07:51 PM
  #30  
abecedarian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 6
From: Temecula Valley, CA
my aunt's 68 firebird had one, my fathers 66 mustang had one.
it's all good though.
and it really only takes a tech to know what it does and how it affects things to say "F" it and let it slide.

so now we have catalytic converters that increase CO2 whereas the old emissions didn't (or at least not to the same degree)

Last edited by abecedarian; Dec 7, 2008 at 07:53 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 07:57 PM
  #31  
4runnermt's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by abecedarian
my aunt's 68 firebird had one, my fathers 66 mustang had one.
it's all good though.
and it really only takes a tech to know what it does and how it affects things to say "F" it and let it slide.

so now we have catalytic converters that increase CO2 whereas the old emissions didn't (or at least not to the same degree)
I'm curious, were those California cars? I ask because I live in Montana which requires no emissions test, so I find later cars 70s/80s/ have the heat riser. Makes me wonder if auto manufacturers just decided to add that kind of stuff to all engines they made.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 07:59 PM
  #32  
abecedarian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 6
From: Temecula Valley, CA
yes, they were cali cars. we always seem to get the bad stuff first.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 08:00 PM
  #33  
4runnermt's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by abecedarian
yes, they were cali cars. we always seem to get the bad stuff first.
Thats what I was wondering! LOL!
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 11:33 PM
  #34  
space-junk's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,527
Likes: 118
From: Wilton, CA
just wondering... i may be talking out my butt, but i think i recall seeing one on my 3vze... is that the same thing??
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Blamalam
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
22
Mar 12, 2022 07:34 AM
rusty904
Items Wanted
19
Mar 27, 2017 05:20 PM
RatOmeter
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
15
Oct 22, 2015 03:17 PM
justdifferentials
Just Differentials
1
Sep 17, 2015 06:14 PM
Tacoma1313
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
2
Aug 17, 2015 05:44 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:16 PM.