Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

88 4 cyl truck braking problem...

Old 06-19-2011, 09:07 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
SCToy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 1,560
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I had a set of carbotech bobcat compound pads made for my truck and they work ridiculously well. I don't let people drive it because if you panic stop you will lock up, which isn't good. Remember sliding friction is a lot less than static friction, so if you lock up your brakes, your stopping distance will be greatly increased. This isn't to say that being able to lock up your brakes is a bad thing, but not being able to modulate them so they don't lock up is. That said, not all pads are not created equally. You need a quality pad, they need to be bedded properly and you need to be sure the system is entirely bled with no water in the lines. Sounds like you have most of this covered except the quality pad, so i would start looking there.
Old 06-22-2011, 11:28 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
Harvey Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bannister, MI
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a few thoughts because I have had the same problem with my 88. When you said that that moving the PV in both directions it didn't make any difference. If the PV is working it should always make a difference one way or the other. My first guess would be that the valve inside the PV is stuck. Mine was (too many Michigan winters) I removed it and removed the return line. But if you want to try to save the PV I think it also has a bleeder on it? Its been a while since I took mine off but I remember trying to bleed it first and it had a lot of rust and junk in it.
My second idea is did you check the rear brakes for proper drag/adjustment? If they are out of adjustment your peddle will travel far and make the brakes harder to lockup because you run out of peddle travel before you hit the floor board. Take a jack and a set of jack stands support the rear axle so both rear tires are in the air and spin the rear tires. They should not make a full rotation if spun.
Old 06-22-2011, 11:53 AM
  #23  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TurboKH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Elma, NY (near Buffalo)
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rears are new, like most everything else, and are adjusted properly. I got the new calipers, just waiting for he new (again) rotors and pads. Hopefully thursday. I bought drilled Brembos and ATE ceramic pads. This truck will stop like a race car. Too bad it's got an engine smaller than my lawn tractor.
Old 06-22-2011, 12:02 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
Kiroshu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Are both the front calipers bleeder valves at the top? If not theres your problem.
Old 06-22-2011, 12:11 PM
  #25  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TurboKH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Elma, NY (near Buffalo)
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh God, yes.
Old 06-22-2011, 12:16 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
Kiroshu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Hehe =P
Old 06-23-2011, 04:50 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Harvey Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bannister, MI
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One other thought I had you may want to check. I know you mentioned that the brake lines are new but are the rubber brake hoses that go to the front calipers and rear axle new? My brothers 85 had soft brakes until we replaced the front and rear rubber hoses with new stainless steel ones. One of the old rubber hoses (25 + years old) where ballooning up when he pressed the brakes. Just thought I would mention it if you have not already checked them.
Old 06-23-2011, 05:37 AM
  #28  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
skypilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Peekskill, NY
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Perhaps you should zip tie the P/V up in the chassis for more rear brake pressure. Have you used the bleeder valve on the P/V yet? You might have air trapped since the P/V is pretty high in the chassis.
I replaced my rear flex hose with one from Marlin Crawler and it made a big difference in pedal feel and travel (might have been shot after 23yrs?) so the front's are next up.
Old 06-23-2011, 09:17 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
angrybob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From this:

Originally Posted by TurboKH
master cylinder from a 91 3.0..

Any ideas???

-Karl
and this:

Originally Posted by TurboKH
The pedal is high and pressure actually feels pretty good. When you start the truck and there's vacuum, the pedal goes down a bit like it should. Based on that I think the booster is okay. No way you can put it to the floor. If I 2-foot the brake, it'll give your face a rush from the negative G, but it's right on the edge of breaking a tire loose... and it shouldn't be necessary to exert that much pedal to create that effect. If i stomped one of my cars (or even the Tundra) that hard they'd stand up on the front bumper.. well.. kinda.
Your truck now has a 1" master cylinder and the stock booster. Originally, it had a 13/16" m/c. The difference in m/c area is now about 50% larger with no additional boost. Line pressure = master cylinder input force from the booster rod / master cylinder area. You are now making that same 50% LESS line pressure than you did with the 13/16" m/c.

Think about all of your comments - new parts, proper adjustments, PEDAL FEELS FINE, booster has vacuum. You are just not generating enough line pressure.

The fix - get the original size 13/16" master cylinder or get the tandem booster thats matched to the 1" master cylinder and you will be fine. You can return the ceramic pads and brembo rotors you bought if not installed (seriously, stick with the OE stuff you already have)...at least don't throw any add'l money at it.

Good luck.

Last edited by angrybob; 06-23-2011 at 09:22 PM.
Old 06-23-2011, 11:55 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
NicCantDecide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by angrybob
From this:



and this:



Your truck now has a 1" master cylinder and the stock booster. Originally, it had a 13/16" m/c. The difference in m/c area is now about 50% larger with no additional boost. Line pressure = master cylinder input force from the booster rod / master cylinder area. You are now making that same 50% LESS line pressure than you did with the 13/16" m/c.

Think about all of your comments - new parts, proper adjustments, PEDAL FEELS FINE, booster has vacuum. You are just not generating enough line pressure.

The fix - get the original size 13/16" master cylinder or get the tandem booster thats matched to the 1" master cylinder and you will be fine. You can return the ceramic pads and brembo rotors you bought if not installed (seriously, stick with the OE stuff you already have)...at least don't throw any add'l money at it.

Good luck.
I agree with this. If you don't match the booster to the master cylinder you can get bad side effects. If your booster is too big it can lock up your brakes without you even being on them (I've had that happen, it sucks). If your booster is too small, you'll never get enough pressure to the calipers.
Old 07-29-2011, 06:13 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
angrybob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just curious if this ever got resolved and how. If so, you should close the loop for future reference.
Old 07-29-2011, 09:41 AM
  #32  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TurboKH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Elma, NY (near Buffalo)
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry to keep you in suspense.. yeah it all works now. (I did add the double diaphram booster a while back, by the way.) It all turned out to be a bad PV. It was NEW, but not working right!! I put another new one in place and it works like it should.. the brakes are awesome now! I guess things don't always operate like the should just because they are right out of the box. As a result of this, I now have all the parts from a 91 3.0 truck plus some crazy drilled Brembo rotors and pads. Way over kill for a truck that gets driven maybe 3 times a month, but.. oh, well.. it works! Next I need to build a stroker for more power...

Thanks to all who contributed to keep the ideas flowing. I really appreciate it!
-Karl
[/I]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
miceal383
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
06-29-2015 12:27 AM
YotaGreenhorn
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
06-27-2015 07:00 AM
gog1968
Newbie Tech Section
2
06-22-2015 05:55 AM
Old Red 94
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
06-16-2015 08:32 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 88 4 cyl truck braking problem...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:39 PM.