Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

3vze performance

Old Dec 23, 2006 | 02:47 PM
  #41  
displacedAlaskan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 64
Likes: 1
From: Delta Junction, Alaska
My cousin has a 94 3.slow that was bone stock this last summer and we took it up some nice sized mountains in Alaska. Didn't get the greatest gas mileage but it had enough guts. He's now added a jacobs system, gapped the spark plugs double normal gap, modified the air intake, put on a straight exhaust with glasspack (I think the glasspack sucks but thats my opinion) and took off the retarded running boards. Gets better gas mileage now, he boasts that it got 36 at 65 on the highway but I think he's full of it. Plenty of power though unless you're gonna try to pull a trailer full of your lifes collections from Alaska to Florida....which is exactly what we tried to do. We ended up getting our buddy to pull the trailer with his v-8 Seqoia. I just got a 95 4runner Limited but mine has an automatic transmission in it, planning on doing all the same mods to it as he did except I've got headers I'm getting ready to put on mine.
The 4 runner is like a big 4wheeler, its great for getting around, but its not made for pulling your stupid horses around to 4H clubs. Anybody that tries to make it do that is just stupid...go buy a sequoia or Tundra if you want that kinda power.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 03:02 PM
  #42  
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota, FL
36mpg on the 3.slow? That and me getting married will ONLY happen after Satan himself gives me a blowjob!
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 05:03 PM
  #43  
ChickenLover's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 1
From: NV
Originally Posted by displacedAlaskan
it got 36 at 65 on the highway
That's funny.

What exactly would 'double gapping' the spark plugs do?
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2006 | 07:15 AM
  #44  
91_4x4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
This is the only thing I was able to find as far as gapping the spark plugs:

http://www.ngvcommunity.com/forum/to...IC_ID=331&#739
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2006 | 07:40 AM
  #45  
dmatter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 20005spd
well the 3.3 with s/c is around 200hp, 3.4 190hp stock, torque on the 3.3 s/c is around 240, 3.4 is around 225 i think. finding a 3.3 s/c that isnt automatic is probably imposible, so compared with my 5spd 4unner it feels the same. it just made me want the s/c for my truck lol. the 3.3 isnt that bad of a motor, nissan has made worse. u wont see mileage with any nissan like you do on toyotas. but its common to see 3.3 s/c with 140k 150k miles. id rather work at a toyota dealership but nissan is ok cuz they are comparable.

I lost $8000.00 Driving a $28,000.00 Nissan Titan for 4 Months! POS Warped Rotors Every Month and had SEVERE Alignment/Bump Steer Issues it Also Sounded like the thing was Falling apart. Oh Yeah when I took the POS From Park to Reverse in the Morning my Neighbors Did'nt Need Alarm Clocks Anymore:bigclap: NISSAN IS JUNK JUNk JUNK JUNK:bigclap:
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2006 | 08:50 AM
  #46  
91_4x4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by dmatter
I lost $8000.00 Driving a $28,000.00 Nissan Titan for 4 Months! POS Warped Rotors Every Month and had SEVERE Alignment/Bump Steer Issues it Also Sounded like the thing was Falling apart. Oh Yeah when I took the POS From Park to Reverse in the Morning my Neighbors Did'nt Need Alarm Clocks Anymore:bigclap: NISSAN IS JUNK JUNk JUNK JUNK:bigclap:
Sounds like a lemon.

Texas Lemon Law: http://www.dot.state.tx.us/services/...aw/default.htm
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2006 | 05:46 AM
  #47  
dmatter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
I dont have time to Sue anybody "I wish I did" I just traded it in for what I "Know" Works. A Tacoma. The Lesson just cost me $8000.00. OUCH!
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2007 | 06:11 PM
  #48  
littleredtoy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
I put a electric fan on my 4runner. Little more power, smother shifting, and same cooling temp. at low speeds.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2007 | 10:33 PM
  #49  
shoes138's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Pflugerville, TX
u guys should drive the 2wd yotas with the 3vz in them! there pretty quick if you just give it some air! i drove the 4x4 truck with a 3vz and man was that thing slow! i couldnt imagine how slow it would be in a 4 runner!
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 05:55 PM
  #50  
CoedNaked's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
I'd be interested in talking to anyone who has actually installed Weasy's cams in their 3.0.

If you have, post.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 06:12 PM
  #51  
4Mogger's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
From: Montrose, CO
Originally Posted by mt_goat
Best option! Don't be afraid of 5.71 gears they do wonders for the 3.slo. You don't need to gear a 3.slo to do 120mph (like the factory does for some strange reason).
Or 7.56's!
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 08:03 PM
  #52  
CoedNaked's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Here's the thing about the 3.0, at least from my perspective as a manual owner.

If this engine had another 5 to 15 HP, and 15 to 25 ft-lbs of torque down low (from 1500 to 3000 RPM's), it would be perfect. Not racy or anything fast, but it would make the truck a little more versatile and provide a lot better driveability.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 08:10 PM
  #53  
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota, FL
Originally Posted by CoedNaked
I'd be interested in talking to anyone who has actually installed Weasy's cams in their 3.0.

If you have, post.

Ive got em in the heads, the heads on the block, and just have to put everything back together!
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 08:43 PM
  #54  
CoedNaked's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Hey Bumpin - but I guess you won't be able to discern their performance difference when you consider the overall number of modifications you have undertaken in your build up? Perhaps you could comfortably ascertain that if guys with headers/exhaust/intake mods are getting this, and you're getting that much more, it must be the cams?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 09:00 PM
  #55  
Ebin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 117
Likes: 2
I am so glad we have "Thread Police" to point out our foibles.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2007 | 02:12 PM
  #56  
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota, FL
Originally Posted by CoedNaked
Hey Bumpin - but I guess you won't be able to discern their performance difference when you consider the overall number of modifications you have undertaken in your build up? Perhaps you could comfortably ascertain that if guys with headers/exhaust/intake mods are getting this, and you're getting that much more, it must be the cams?
well this is true that im doing a LOT of modifications to my truck all at once, but the overall difference from OEM should be HUGE. Ted at Engine builder found that the 3vze would gain about 30 rwhp when one gave the heads larger valves, a good PNP, and headers. While I dont have headers I should gain about the same, or more from the cams. Im also trying to get a set of used headers currently....

Weasy2k did nothing other than to swap cams in his truck and gained across the whole powerband, BUT the dyno malfunctioned, so we dont have a good set of dynographs to go off of. He did however note a GOOD seat of the pants difference.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 09:49 PM
  #57  
displacedAlaskan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 64
Likes: 1
From: Delta Junction, Alaska
Yes I agree that my cousin's boast of 36 miles to the gallon is a bunch of horse˟˟˟˟˟. But the Jacobs system did make a difference for him on mileage, and I noticed after installing my system a definite change in how smooth my engine runs and a slight increase in throttle response. Mine gets 19 highway and about 15 city, even after everything that I've done to it. The 3.0 does not burn gas efficiently and a LOT of power is wasted.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 10:00 PM
  #58  
yotawheelin95's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Menomonie, WI
what about boring the 3.0 out? anybody know of this?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 02:04 PM
  #59  
Greg_Canada's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by yotawheelin95
what about boring the 3.0 out? anybody know of this?
Not worth it unless and pretty impossible if you want to go more than .06 over...
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2007 | 10:56 PM
  #60  
shoes138's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Pflugerville, TX
what the hell can i get jacobs ignition stuff?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:05 PM.