Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

33's come tomorrow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2008, 09:34 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
drew303's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Jay351
I did my bj spacers next... shortly after installing my rebuilt idler and the downey brace.
With the brace, the idler arm is essentially as strong as the pitman arm and steering box. When you turn, or the front suspension flexes you're apply stress on every pivoting joint in the steering system. Add balljoints and you've now effected how the suspension applies forces to the steering. BJ's cause the tie rod ends to bind up more which obviously puts more stress on everything if its binding. With the brace installed, you've focused the new forces directly on the idler arm.... which is just a hinge. The hinge rides on the bushings you speak of.

similar stress obviously occurs on a stock setup but not as much as after you change how the tierods move up n down. With balljoint spacerrs, they bind more as I just mentioned. Without the brace, your arm bends up. Usually about 1/2" or so. Just enough for the pass side rod to find itself a comfy home it likes. The Driver side still binds but the pitman arm/steering box arent weak enough to "bend"... but that force has to go somewhere so it's still more stress on the steering box guts than it was designed for but none the less I think its strong enough to take the brunt without whining. (or better known as wearing out)

Originally Posted by Jay351
The next time I went wheeling (mild rock crawling) I noticed the wheel was shaking alot on the road... the steering was just sloppy... I pulled the bushings out - and.. it wasnt broken, cracked. Just worn down a substantial amount.... Popped new ones in and the truck drove smooth as ever.
Theres a lot of factors that could explain why you might experience premature bushing failure when no one else is. Like I said before, with the brace, the stress is centered on the idlers pivot, the bushings that harness the rod that connects teh idlers.. "arm" Factors like, well obviously the balljoints but also how the truck was aligned. The lower A-arm moves in and out (we all know this) but what I think we generally overlook is that if you move the A-arm in... when the suspensioin flexs, that tierod is pushed, in as the system compresses. I've never seen two trucks lower arms adjusted identical. The mounts bend, warp,... where you have your t-bars adjusted effects how the shop is going to align the wheels.

W/ BJ spacers the tire as it moves up n down, moves in andout of camber. Since the A-arms are no longer parallel the hub as it moves up n down changes camber all through the travel. So whereever you 'set' your front end when you have it aligned is where the shop is going to set camber to zero. This directly effects where the tech positions the lower a-arm mounts.

Which is a dynamic difference on everyones truck making no two alike and making no two persons experience with their idler arms the same.

Originally Posted by Jay351
I see Matt stepped in with some good info. I guess you're just a genious. Since big fat heavy mud tires don't add ANY stress to the stock suspension... designed around a 31x10.50" street tire......
To clarify, I never said big fat heavy mud tires didnt effect the suspension. I thought we were discussing how big fat heavy mud tires effect steering components?
Old 10-15-2008, 09:43 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
drew303's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I would support the notion that larger tires increase stress on the idler arm itself but in a rather minor way.

Obviously its harder to turn a larger tire, bigger footprint, more weight and depending on the tread to and whether the rubber is soft or hard.

It could be more difficult to turn a smaller softer tire than say one of those Costco brand (kirkland) hard as rock crappy tires that is of a larger diameter.

More force that is needed to turn a tire, means more stress on everything. I agree with that but I find it unfair to expect bushing issues with the idler arm by simply going to a larger tire.
Old 10-15-2008, 09:52 PM
  #43  
Contributing Member
 
Jay351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
sorry, I ment to say steering. Typo
Old 10-15-2008, 09:57 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
Countryhick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Washougal Washington
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im running 33 12.50 15's on my 4runner and i have 14-15 town 16-18 highway.

With 5:29 gearing and a blown head. lol
Old 10-16-2008, 07:00 AM
  #45  
Registered User
 
4runnerguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: canada, ontario
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and its not only the tires that make a diff. i have 33x12.50 with a 15x10 rim just keep in mind the steel rims are heavy as i have aluminums and they make a big diff on the weight
Old 10-16-2008, 11:16 PM
  #46  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
stormin94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by stormin94
I did the 4Crawler 1" body lift, rather than the BJ spacers. I've always had my t bars cranked a little bit (no more than 1 inch). But I definitely see what you mean about the larger tires being tougher on the steering components. I've been taking it easy though. I still get some rubbing when it flexes, or it's cranked hard over, but nothing too severe tho.

Also, if any one is on the fence about doing a small body lift, I would highly recommend the 4 Crawler 1" body lift if you need a little more clearance for your tires, or want to make oil changes and other maintenence easier. It was a very simple and straight forward installation, and only took about 3-4 hours. A few issues I had with the kit was the difficulty installing the front bumper brackets, adjusting the steering shaft, and the gear shifters binding up a little in 2nd, and 4th gears. To eliminate the bumper brackets issue, I just drilled the stock ones so they compensate for about 1/2-3/4 of an inch, so any gap left behind by the body lift in the front is minimal, and I mean very minimal, even without using the bumper brackets. The steering shaft did not want to slide out, but after extensive lubrication, it finally did, and now performs great. As for the shifters, I still haven't resolved this problem. They still bind, even after modifying the metal ring that holds the rubber boot in place. Modifying the ring made a difference, and now it doesn't pop out of gear in 2nd or 4th, but that isn't enough. I am going to try everything shy of cutting the rubber boot to fix this. Although it's probably not a serious problem, it is pretty annoying trying to shift into 2nd or 4th gear. If anyone has any info about this, it is much appreciated.
So aside from the all important debate over various IFS components being "weak", does anyone have any useful info relating to the subject at hand? No disrespect, I'm just looking for information without arguement.
Old 10-16-2008, 11:23 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
Mic09dcsm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Have fun, it's your truck.
Old 10-16-2008, 11:50 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
4runnerguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: canada, ontario
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well it all depends on how much u been on your truck when u wheel
Old 10-17-2008, 08:15 AM
  #49  
Banned
 
Trustyrusty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: (Rednecks Inbreed In) Kansas
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Matt I didn't mean to say the spacer is weak, its a hunk of metal like you said, it weakens other things... Man Im tired..
Old 02-23-2009, 12:50 AM
  #50  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
stormin94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Update

A little update since I've had my 33's in October.

At full flex in the rear, I do get some minor rubbing, and at full crank I still get some rubbing in the front, but nothing too severe.

Road noise is noticeable, but not overpowering.

Power loss is definitely noticeable, but I've adjusted my driving habits to cope.

MPG has dropped significantly, down to near 14 all the time, and it's a surprise to average over 15.5MPG

I got the recall done on the steering relay rods, and the dealership did an alignment for free, so it drives straighter down the road.

The tires are wearing very well, and I've put around 4000-5000 miles on them.

I've had to trim some of the metal bracket that holds the rubber shift boot in place due to some interferance from the body lift.



I am looking into regearing to 4.88's and possibly including a locker in that install.
Old 05-06-2009, 10:43 PM
  #51  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
stormin94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Update

On a certain route, I can average over 17MPG round trip while driving normal. The best I've achieved so far is about 17.8MPG. Other than that... it's around 14MPG.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nvwiggins
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
13
06-16-2016 03:05 PM
BimmerSage
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
2
09-17-2015 11:48 PM
JookUpVandetti
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
8
09-17-2015 09:25 PM
BimmerSage
New York
0
09-17-2015 05:21 PM
JookUpVandetti
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
7
09-10-2015 08:56 AM



Quick Reply: 33's come tomorrow



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:53 PM.