Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

shocks: Blistein or OME

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2004, 11:38 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
wvuviv30's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lusby, MD
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
shocks: Blistein or OME

Decisions... I am getting OME rear coils in the next couple of weeks.

Looking at shocks to get. (all 4)
Old Man Emu Mediums (not the heavey duty)
Blistiens

Which one to get? I do a lot of highway traveling some off-road (down fire roads and back county trails)
Old 05-05-2004, 05:50 AM
  #2  
Away
 
Dr. Zhivago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you're getting the OME Coils, you should stick with the OME Shocks.

My .02
G
Old 05-05-2004, 06:12 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
sn0w_m0nkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: new mexico
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bilsteins were worth in my rig. i do alot of snow driving in t he winter and off road the bilsteins are just incredible. buy 'em at autozone if you do, they have good prices and you get the lifetime deal for them there.
Old 05-05-2004, 06:35 AM
  #4  
AF1
Registered User
 
AF1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had sensa tracks on my truck......VERY nice ride! Switched to Bilsteins....ride stiffened up and not to harsh.....For the trailing I do.....Perfect!
Old 05-05-2004, 06:40 AM
  #5  
Contributing Member
 
TStango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go with OME. I just swapped out my Bilstein for them. Bilsteins have a soft boot and because of this, I was not able to uninstall the shocks without damaging them. OME's seemed to be built better. The ride is good too, not as harsh as the high pressured billies.
Old 05-05-2004, 07:45 AM
  #6  
Contributing Member
 
turboale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 4,868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are primarily on road, I would get the bils. If you do a bit of wheeling get the OMEs. I had the HD coils on the bils and my truck rode like it was on rails in the corners. It was on the harsher side, but i'm young and don't mind it. Espcially when you get such good handling (if you saw the road I drive to work you'd understand). Plus, I was completely confident. I think of it as a safety thing. Yeah, you don't get as much flex out of them or bla bla bla, but when avoiding an accident... i'd rather be on the bils.

my .o2
Old 05-05-2004, 11:18 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
CMD93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Richmond,VA
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TStango
Go with OME. I just swapped out my Bilstein for them. Bilsteins have a soft boot and because of this, I was not able to uninstall the shocks without damaging them. OME's seemed to be built better. The ride is good too, not as harsh as the high pressured billies.

Can't you just use a allen key to keep the "soft boot" from rotating while you losen the nut with an open end wrench. Just the reverse of installation?
Old 05-05-2004, 11:31 AM
  #8  
Contributing Member
 
Scofco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Whitehorse, Yukon
Posts: 3,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm running the medium OME shocks with Heavy Duty rear OME coils.
I think it's an awesome combo.
Old 05-05-2004, 12:13 PM
  #9  
Contributing Member
 
TStango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CMD93
Can't you just use a allen key to keep the "soft boot" from rotating while you losen the nut with an open end wrench. Just the reverse of installation?
There is no room to work with the allen wrench and and it will strip with the amount of torque needed to muscle that nut thru those corroded threads. PB blaster helped, but not enough. Believe me, I tried. The amount of time I was spending on trying to not damaged the shaft of the Bilsteins was not worth the money I would get for selling them. This might only be a Northeast corrosion issue though. Using a strap wrench on the OME metal boot keeps the shaft from turning and it makes things soooo much easier.
Old 05-09-2004, 12:30 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
2001Millrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bilsteins are stiffer shocks.... If you like the plush ride and better ride offroad i'd go OME....I dont care what everyone says but bilsteins do have harsh onroad ride.
Old 05-09-2004, 01:37 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
KevyWevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
which ones have more of a choice for length??? im puttin ball joint spacers in the front and cruiser coils in the back, right now for the front im looking at rancho, just because i can look and see what the extended and copressed length of each shock they carry is.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZGjethro
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
5
06-07-2017 11:04 PM
Scottcrb
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
6
03-03-2016 11:57 AM
A2theK
Axles - Suspensions - Tires - Wheels
2
10-14-2015 07:10 AM
Swampwalker
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
5
10-12-2015 09:49 AM
justdifferentials
Vendors Build-Ups (Build-Up Section)
0
09-05-2015 06:52 PM



Quick Reply: shocks: Blistein or OME



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:50 AM.