Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

17.6 vs. 20.3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2003, 04:33 AM
  #1  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
Sac State's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Piedmont, North Carolina
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
17.6 vs. 20.3

What is up with the on-board mileage computer. The computer says 20.3, but my manual calculation I am getting 17.6 mpg. The rig is stock and I drive like an old man using 93 octane.

Taking it to the dealer for routine maintenance, should I have them look at this discrepancy? Has any one had a similar experience with their actual mileage and what the on board computer says the mileage is?

Wonder how accurate the rest of the computer readings are...miles left on tank and speed. I have noticed the speed off as well noticeably.
Old 10-30-2003, 07:37 AM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
Good Times's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know that cpu is wrong period I don't even bother to use it. The only feature I use on that part is the outside temp and I think that's pretty inaccurate at best.

Don't bother asking the stealer why it's wrong because they'll just say some BS to ya to brush it off. Those thing are never accurate anyway.
Old 11-03-2003, 04:59 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
EricM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mine's wrong all the time too, though it reads 17ish and I'm getting 15ish. I was reading through the service manual to see if there was any sort of calibration that can be done, but apparently not. After looking at the manual though, I'm surprised that it's as accurate as it is... the "input" for fuel consumption simply comes from the fuel gage... hardly an accurate measure of consumption. It probably becomes more accurate if you never fill the tank all of the way (where it's pegged on "F" for a while).
Old 11-03-2003, 08:45 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
TechWrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Glenville, NY
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have also noticed the the discrepancy between the display readings and actual calculations. I always reset the display every time I fill up. I wonder if the readings get closer to 'real' life if you let them continue to run on with each tank? Might have to try that experiment for a month or so.
Old 11-03-2003, 11:24 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
FirstToy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I never reset my computer and it seems to be pretty accurate, it does read optomistic but not too bad.
Old 11-04-2003, 07:33 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
HBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've heard that about the new 4Runners. I think they're using the European MPG standard, instead of US/Imperial.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ashamsuddin
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
17
01-13-2023 03:17 AM
shisha1999
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
12
09-21-2015 08:22 PM
mxdw88
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
09-20-2015 03:13 AM
AndYota
FJ Cruiser
7
08-10-2015 09:19 AM
msane99
Pre 84 Trucks
6
07-11-2015 08:08 PM



Quick Reply: 17.6 vs. 20.3



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:57 PM.