Load Range E: Any ill effects?
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Load Range E: Any ill effects?
Anyone running load range "E" tires? My friend has some E's on her Ranger (REVOS) and has had them for 3 years with still about 10/32's left. I think E's would last a long time on a 4Runner. Trying to decide between D's an E's in my next Nitto set...
#2
my destination m/t tires are load range E. No problem whatever on my 4Runner. It has been on for one year now and still lots of treads left. The key is keep rotates the tires every 5,000 miles or so.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't confuse load range with tread wear rating. Load range is the tires capacity to carry weight - it is not a yardstick for tread life. The higher the Load Range rating, the stiffer the tire. High Load Range ratings are not the best choice for wheelin' since the stiff tire has trouble conforming to the surface (especially rocks and the like) when aired down.
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Spencer, Iowa
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My old 265's were load range C and my new 285's are load range D. I can tell a difference in the ride as the D rated tires are definitely stiffer. Unless you do a ton of towing, I'd avoid an E rated tire because of the poorer ride and as mentioned above, lack of off road ability.
#7
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
D is as high a load rating you want to go on a 3rd or 4th gen Runner since E is way overkill and designed for trucks weighing another 1500-2000lbs and you pay more for the E rated tires.
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bogus, the ride is the same. I have had Ds & E's of the same tire (BFG A/T) and they ride the same. The E's are just lastin longer. I have 32k miles on them and they are roughly half tread. The D's had 3/32 on them when I took them off at 43k miles.
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The difference in price between an E and a D load tire (BFG & Nitto) is $4 per tire. Not much difference, but the E's last longer IMO.
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't confuse load range with tread wear rating. Load range is the tires capacity to carry weight - it is not a yardstick for tread life. The higher the Load Range rating, the stiffer the tire. High Load Range ratings are not the best choice for wheelin' since the stiff tire has trouble conforming to the surface (especially rocks and the like) when aired down.
#11
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
4Runners ride rough anyway and I don't need the extra miles on a tire dealing with the rougher ride and yes,I've driven a couple of 3rd gens with E load rated tires on them and the way I drive the E slide too much vs the D rating which has better dry grip due to a little more sidewall flex.
Nittos now have a 50k warranty so it mileage issues don't bother me plus it takes almost 5 years for me to hit 50k miles.
Nittos now have a 50k warranty so it mileage issues don't bother me plus it takes almost 5 years for me to hit 50k miles.
#13
Registered User
I had "E" BFG A/T KO's for about 700 miles and then had Discount Tires change them to "C".
Small plug for Discount Tires, I simply let them know I wasn't satisfied and they changed the tires out for just the remounting charge of $12 a tire.
Anyhow, with the "E" rated tires the bumps felt much sharper (if that makes sense); the bumps are still there with the "C's" but the hit is a little smoother.
Gas mileage is the same, and on road traction seems no different, I've done no wheeling so nothing to report there.
Small plug for Discount Tires, I simply let them know I wasn't satisfied and they changed the tires out for just the remounting charge of $12 a tire.
Anyhow, with the "E" rated tires the bumps felt much sharper (if that makes sense); the bumps are still there with the "C's" but the hit is a little smoother.
Gas mileage is the same, and on road traction seems no different, I've done no wheeling so nothing to report there.
#14
Contributing Member
I got load range E MT/R's and they are uh... well, I donno any difference.
I'd imagine they would be better for offroading because they have thicker sidewalls, no?
I'd imagine they would be better for offroading because they have thicker sidewalls, no?
#16
Registered User
I ran E's also and they seemed to do just fine aired down. You are also able to run less air pressure because the side walls are stiffer. Aired down and wheeling over rocks i never had a side wall tear (Nittos). I am not sure what i am going to do when i go 35's but...i will cross that bridge here shortly
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Government UTQG Ratings do not apply to light truck sized tires.
Not sure what a "light truck sized tire" is but it looks as though some manufacturers are providing UTQG voluntarily. UTOG ratings aren't much good when comparing brand vs brand (due to non-standard testing procedures) but are really beneficial when comparing tires from the same manufacturer.
It would kind of stand to reason that a tire designed to carry a heavier load would have a harder tread compound otherwise wear might be less than acceptable. Increased tread life almost always comes at the expense of traction (which is why performance tires don't last for squat), so me thinks the Es might not yield as much traction as lower load ranges.
If manufacturers are making load range E tires that ride as good as Bs then I'm impressed. My limited experience with E vs C is night and day.
Last edited by Maj; 11-25-2007 at 04:45 AM.
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I'm not mistaken the light truck size tire is the LT before the tire size. Example I've got LT265/75/16s wrangler at/s. This is still my first set of tires I put on since I got the vehicle used. Since this was my first tire suv/truck (had a civic b4 this) I don't have any comparisons. They have lasted well over 60,000 miles. But I will need some new ones by spring/summer.
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On my second set of BFG ATs 265/75/16s. The first set was a D rated tire and lasted an awesome 65k miles. Went to discount about a month ago and they only had E's in that size, so I went with em...they're noticeably stiffer. They recommended airing down 5 psi or so and see if it makes a difference...I may try that for a bit.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
the1998sr5
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
15
07-14-2020 08:35 PM