BFG AT KO 265/75/16 E on a 98 4runner too much???
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Breckenridge, Colorado
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BFG AT KO 265/75/16 E on a 98 4runner too much???
hi, its time to replace my bfg at ko 265/75/16's which were D's (8 ply) and have been discontinued....... anyone running 265/75/16 E's on a 3rd gen 4runner? hows the ride? any complaints? pros/ cons?
thanks, Stefan.
thanks, Stefan.
#3
I run 235/85 on my 3rd gen which are E rated. They seem to actually ride better than the C rated tires that were on there. You do "feel" the road a bit more, but they ride just fine.
I don't think you will notice a difference at all going from D's to E's.
I don't think you will notice a difference at all going from D's to E's.
#4
Contributing Member
I'm running 265/75r16 E on the '99 and 285/75r16 on the '96, but they're Michelin A/T's, not BFG. Not a big difference from the LTX M/S I had on the '96 and a huge (better) difference from the too small P rateds that came on the '99.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flying91
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
45
04-11-2024 04:39 PM
RedRunner_87
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
84
06-01-2021 01:51 PM
BeMiceElf
Misc Stuff (Vehicle Related)
7
10-10-2015 09:40 PM