more power
#22
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
header and air intake results
I added the header and cold air intake from Downey and went up from 15.7 to 17.2 mpg. I don't have access to a dyno, so mpg was a good way for me to get a measurement of increased performance.
The cat-back is next and I'm hoping for similar gains. Someone said that 2.5" tubing is too large a diameter for a 4cyl (apparently low rpm power loss due to loss of back pressure) and that 2.25" is better. Can anyone confirm this? All the cat-back systems I've found online are 2.5", though.
Yota82 -- you recommended higher octane gas and advancing the timing -- how many degrees? I'd like to try this.
The cat-back is next and I'm hoping for similar gains. Someone said that 2.5" tubing is too large a diameter for a 4cyl (apparently low rpm power loss due to loss of back pressure) and that 2.25" is better. Can anyone confirm this? All the cat-back systems I've found online are 2.5", though.
Yota82 -- you recommended higher octane gas and advancing the timing -- how many degrees? I'd like to try this.
#23
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sedro Woolley washington
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i might go buy a new exhaust manifold tomarrow and new tubing back (rip the cat out) its getin new paint sat and sun. so i wanna get all the banging and beatin of putin a new man. in b4 paint.
does ANY one have thoughts on chips ?as i mentioned in my first post?
does ANY one have thoughts on chips ?as i mentioned in my first post?
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA.
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For basic and cheap power I have had the best results with a header, 2.25" full exhaust, intake, 8*-10* BTDC on the ignition timing, 89 octane, 2 clicks rich on AFM.
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA.
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A little friendly advice: watch what you say about removing the cat on this site. The thread will either get locked of you will get banned. Chips are a waste of money. You essentially do the same thing as a chip when you remove the thermostat from your vehicle.
#26
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sedro Woolley washington
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh thanks for the advice
removing the thermostat as in takin out the heater? that thing is my best friend during huntin season lol
removing the thermostat as in takin out the heater? that thing is my best friend during huntin season lol
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA.
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not saying to remove the thermostat. I'm just saying that the computer thinks the same thing when the thermostat is removed as it it does with those so called "performance chips". The only difference is with a chip the engine could be at normal operating temperature. For the money they are charging it is definantly not worth it.
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Petersburg va.
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its like the man said " Speed costs how fast do ya wanna go? " To get a lota power out of your 22 you gotta make it scream then you loose your bottom end torque. If your cat is starting to plug that will sure eat all kindsa power and make it run hot. Go back with a higher flowing cat when you redo the exhaust. Remember you have to have some back pressure or you wont run any better than you started with. Most likely worse.
Jim
Jim
#29
Registered User
I'm just saying that the computer thinks the same thing when the thermostat is removed as it it does with those so called "performance chips". The only difference is with a chip the engine could be at normal operating temperature. For the money they are charging it is definantly not worth it.
Leaving the thermostat out will decrease the engine temperature.
Lower engine temperature will mean that you'll be running a richer mixture.
A richer mixture, contrary to what most people think, will not result in more power.
I'd hope that the JET chip would impact timing also, but who knows - I've never seen a dyno run with one.
Search - there are lots of bolt on ways to get more power out of a 22RE.
#32
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Estes Park Co
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#33
Registered User
Actually, I'd recommend a cold air intake on the 22RE. The intake temps measured in stock form are 120-125 degrees at 75 degrees ambient temperature... You could get a big temp drop with a decent cold air intake.
#35
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sedro Woolley washington
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what the heck is a isr and deck plate?!?! i found a chip on ebay for 20 bucks and it has a shut off switch and dial so u can control when u have power. now if i go 2" tubing to my flow from the headers do i really need a cat in? there are so many oppinions out there
#37
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The cat-back is next and I'm hoping for similar gains. Someone said that 2.5" tubing is too large a diameter for a 4cyl (apparently low rpm power loss due to loss of back pressure) and that 2.25" is better. Can anyone confirm this? All the cat-back systems I've found online are 2.5", though.
Then I would read this:
http://www.4x4wire.com/forums/showfl...&o=365&fpart=1
[/QUOTE]
And please, keep your cat on, yes, some of us think it is just plain selfish for people to poison the air because they think it helps them drive a little faster. Is their a race? Are you winning a trophy?
#39
Registered User