why does this supercharger look different?
#1
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Reading PA
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why does this supercharger look different?
hey guys... doing alittle surfing and I came across this ebay add. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Toyot...spagenameZWDVW
But it looks very different than all the others... Im really thinking of the supercharger and the price is right... The supercharger has its goods and bads im reading, but i keep reading all the other mods neccesary for the complete package... im still up in the air... anyway... just ranting now. any thoughts on the different looks ?
But it looks very different than all the others... Im really thinking of the supercharger and the price is right... The supercharger has its goods and bads im reading, but i keep reading all the other mods neccesary for the complete package... im still up in the air... anyway... just ranting now. any thoughts on the different looks ?
#2
Contributing Member
That was the 1st gen S/C (the black are 2nd gens).
Read Gadget's page if you are planning on getting one:
http://www.gadgetonline.com/super.htm
Read Gadget's page if you are planning on getting one:
http://www.gadgetonline.com/super.htm
Last edited by MTL_4runner; 01-24-2006 at 06:14 PM.
#3
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Reading PA
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it says it was for a 97?
added: nevermind... i thought you meant 1st gen 4runner... im slow tonight
added: nevermind... i thought you meant 1st gen 4runner... im slow tonight
Last edited by SnoViking; 01-24-2006 at 05:56 PM.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not a bad deal, even though there is mad time left, anyone know of a general cost on the parts needed, I have wanted the s/c for a long time, but the price has deterred me, and the fact I have to use super. even a guess would be fine.
#7
Contributing Member
Originally Posted by JHupp
errr, cant find it, link please??? thanks in advance
https://www.yotatech.com/forums/f2/all-those-who-supercharged-77119/
Trending Topics
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey what is the difference between this one and the second gen one's, is their anything wrong with this first gen design will it function as well as the newere models
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: santa fe, nm
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=984RNR]Hey what is the difference between this one and the second gen one's, is their anything wrong with this first gen design will it function as well as the newere models[/QUOTE ]
the second gen have a bypass valve integrated into the cast body. supposedly they also run a bit cooler than the first gen. but neither of these would be enough of an issue to dissuade me from scooping up a good deal on a first gen. shouldnt for you either. spend the money you save a real fuel system, not that additional injector crap that's still stuck in the 80's before people knew how to use and program larger injectors.
the second gen have a bypass valve integrated into the cast body. supposedly they also run a bit cooler than the first gen. but neither of these would be enough of an issue to dissuade me from scooping up a good deal on a first gen. shouldnt for you either. spend the money you save a real fuel system, not that additional injector crap that's still stuck in the 80's before people knew how to use and program larger injectors.
Last edited by hokiruu; 01-25-2006 at 08:21 PM.
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=hokiruu]
My "additional injector crap" seems to work just fine. Unless you find me a "real fuel system" that runs smoother and makes more HP than my "additional injector crap", I think I will stay with what I've got------
I may be "stuck in the 80's" but I am also stuck with a damn smooth running truck with over 300 rear wheel HP.
Originally Posted by 984RNR
Hey what is the difference between this one and the second gen one's, is their anything wrong with this first gen design will it function as well as the newere models[/QUOTE ]
the second gen have a bypass valve integrated into the cast body. supposedly they also run a bit cooler than the first gen. but neither of these would be enough of an issue to dissuade me from scooping up a good deal on a first gen. shouldnt for you either. spend the money you save a real fuel system, not that additional injector crap that's still stuck in the 80's before people knew how to use and program larger injectors.
the second gen have a bypass valve integrated into the cast body. supposedly they also run a bit cooler than the first gen. but neither of these would be enough of an issue to dissuade me from scooping up a good deal on a first gen. shouldnt for you either. spend the money you save a real fuel system, not that additional injector crap that's still stuck in the 80's before people knew how to use and program larger injectors.
I may be "stuck in the 80's" but I am also stuck with a damn smooth running truck with over 300 rear wheel HP.
Last edited by TRDOLMAN; 01-26-2006 at 08:31 AM.
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: santa fe, nm
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=TRDOLMAN]
TRDOLMAN, lol I forgot that you were running the 7th injector. I am glad you are happy with it and I have always liked your Tacoma, you have done well with it. No offense intended to those who have it. I know additional injectors do work and are cost effective, especially for low boost and lighter duty like on the TRD supercharger. I know its a bit off topic but let me just explain my reason for saying what I said.
I just personally prefer to add additional fuel at all of the injectors and as close to the cylinder as possible for many reasons.
The way I see it is: I want to get as even an A/F ratio accross all of the cylinders as possible. The best way to ensure this is to inject the same amount of additional fuel to each injector as close to the cylinder as possible. It just makes sense. The intake tract has alot between the additional injector and the cylinder compared to a setup with larger injectors. I also would rather replace each injector in its stock location than plumb the additional fuel line. Not that it's hard, it's just the way I would rather do it.
Ease of tuning is another reason. I'd rather "synchronize the rowing team" than tell one odd extra guy at the front of the boat how to paddle to keep the boat straight. This brings me to my next point.
God forbid something should go wrong with the piggyback additional injector controller (or it's user), you could be left with an injector creating puddles in the intake tract. And that's never a good thing. I've seen a guy with a Cobra blow his intake manifold to pieces and light his car on fire because of this.
I know injectors are expensive, but given the option I'd take it hands down.
Anyway I am sorry for jacking the thread. I am done now.
Once again, I know the 7th or 9th injector works fine, I just have problem with vocalizing my opinions. and I want to instill the sense of importance of a proper fuel system if your adding boost to those who might "forget" to do it. Too many damn Tacomas with the TRD blower and no fuel mods out there!
Originally Posted by hokiruu
My "additional injector crap" seems to work just fine. Unless you find me a "real fuel system" that runs smoother and makes more HP than my "additional injector crap", I think I will stay with what I've got------
I may be "stuck in the 80's" but I am also stuck with a damn smooth running truck with over 300 rear wheel HP.
I may be "stuck in the 80's" but I am also stuck with a damn smooth running truck with over 300 rear wheel HP.
I just personally prefer to add additional fuel at all of the injectors and as close to the cylinder as possible for many reasons.
The way I see it is: I want to get as even an A/F ratio accross all of the cylinders as possible. The best way to ensure this is to inject the same amount of additional fuel to each injector as close to the cylinder as possible. It just makes sense. The intake tract has alot between the additional injector and the cylinder compared to a setup with larger injectors. I also would rather replace each injector in its stock location than plumb the additional fuel line. Not that it's hard, it's just the way I would rather do it.
Ease of tuning is another reason. I'd rather "synchronize the rowing team" than tell one odd extra guy at the front of the boat how to paddle to keep the boat straight. This brings me to my next point.
God forbid something should go wrong with the piggyback additional injector controller (or it's user), you could be left with an injector creating puddles in the intake tract. And that's never a good thing. I've seen a guy with a Cobra blow his intake manifold to pieces and light his car on fire because of this.
I know injectors are expensive, but given the option I'd take it hands down.
Anyway I am sorry for jacking the thread. I am done now.
Once again, I know the 7th or 9th injector works fine, I just have problem with vocalizing my opinions. and I want to instill the sense of importance of a proper fuel system if your adding boost to those who might "forget" to do it. Too many damn Tacomas with the TRD blower and no fuel mods out there!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LCE_Performance
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
0
10-01-2015 01:03 PM
anniesball
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
10
09-15-2015 05:41 PM
anniesball
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
09-09-2015 09:55 AM
anniesball
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
09-07-2015 11:20 AM