Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

What's your opinion, 33x12.5 or 33x10.5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2005, 08:08 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
ToyoRunner94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's your opinion, 33x12.5 or 33x10.5

ive been looking to get a new set of muds for the runner and ive heard a lot of mix opinion. a lot of people like just the standard ratio 33x12.5 but ive heard a few liking the 33x10.5. what do you think?
Old 04-17-2005, 08:14 AM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
Marc P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Santee, CA
Posts: 2,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the same setup as you--I went with 33x10.5 for a couple reasons. I wanted to keep my original rims, wanted to keep the footprint the same to save on gas and wear and tear.
They fit great--no rubbing at all

Old 04-17-2005, 08:18 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Randomness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Marc, you think the 33/10.5's would have fit ok without the BJ spacers? Basically, do you think they'd fit on my rig
Old 04-17-2005, 08:44 AM
  #4  
Contributing Member
iTrader: (3)
 
4Crawler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 10,817
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
They may or may not. You might be able to get away with a little fender trimming or crank up the t-bars if needed. You can test the clearance with your existing tires, make a 1" tall block and try sliding that over the tread face in various combinations of suspension and steering. If the block clears then the tires should fit:

http://www.4crawler.com/4x4/ForSale/...it.shtml#FAQ10

I run the 33x10.50s on stock 6" rims and am pretty happy with them:

http://www.4crawler.com/4x4/BFG_AT_KO.shtml

Last edited by 4Crawler; 04-17-2005 at 08:45 AM.
Old 04-17-2005, 09:12 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Randomness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good idea about the block...
Old 04-17-2005, 06:21 PM
  #6  
Contributing Member
 
Yamaha+Toyota=Fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bellingham, Washington and Ketchikan, Alaska
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have 33x12.5's. I like the more agressive stance, and bigger foot print. I got wide tires because I going in the mountains in deep snow. With skinny tires in deep snow youll dig your self a good hole really quick.
Old 04-20-2005, 12:15 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
deathrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 2,969
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I used to run 12.50's and I switched over to 10.50's

Better pickup with a 22re, for sure. I gained about 1 mpg. I am able to run factory 3rd gen rims.

I haven't got stuck with them yet. They cut alot better than the 12.50's I used to slide across mud in the 12.50's where now I seem to get more bite with my 10.50's (Granted this isn't Alabama, but that is what I noticed in my little shallow mud experiences)

Oh yeah, less rubbing for sure, too.

And they're cheaper!!!!

I'd do 12.50's if you see alot of sand or mud specifically. (Although I have had no problems with th 10.50's the extra width would help in those situations.
Old 04-20-2005, 12:44 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
lllateralus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I personally think the 10.5's look goofy!

Too tall, not wide enough!!
Old 04-20-2005, 03:10 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
jon_7248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Grapevine TX
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I personally think people get to excited while posting !!!! and use too much of these !!!

No, but seriously, I love the 33x1050s. They dont demand much of a lift, more pressure on the ground, and look kinda nice given the right body and rim backspacing.
Old 04-20-2005, 04:16 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Colemanfu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DAYTONA USA
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
12.5 all the way! Why do you air down off road- bigger contact patch. Why not start wider?
Have you ever seen the Pontiac ads?

I like the 12.5 on an 8 inch rim but they look to fat on a 10 in wide rim. If you need new rims get some 8 black wagon wheels with the correct BS. No too much more $.

Not a big fan of tall skinny tires. If you were to go that direction just get some 34 x10's. All your flex should be off road and you do air them down right?
Old 04-20-2005, 04:35 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Johnboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would go with the 33x12.50. I think it looks more proportional to the size of the tire and IMO it looks better.
Old 04-20-2005, 05:10 PM
  #12  
Contributing Member
 
Dublin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Appleton, Wi. USA
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm kinda partial to 33x12.5's, guess that's why I'm running them.
Old 04-20-2005, 05:16 PM
  #13  
Contributing Member
 
AxleIke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by lllateralus
Well, I personally think the 10.5's look goofy!

Too tall, not wide enough!!
You should see the 33x9.5's!
Old 04-20-2005, 08:25 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
4rnr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Plainfield, IL
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
12.50
Old 04-20-2005, 08:55 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
jon_7248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Grapevine TX
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmm, the 34x1050s isnt that bad of an idea. I might get those LTBs that come in that size.
Old 04-20-2005, 10:05 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
deathrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 2,969
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
[QUOTE=jon_7248]I personally think people get to excited while posting !!!! and use too much of these !!![QUOTE]



What are you talking about???????????????

Last edited by deathrunner; 04-20-2005 at 10:06 PM.
Old 04-21-2005, 12:50 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
az4x4runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Yavapai County, Arizona
Posts: 1,651
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
I only have 31s, but I think 33x10.50s look better.
Old 04-21-2005, 05:07 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
jon_7248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Grapevine TX
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=deathrunner][QUOTE=jon_7248]I personally think people get to excited while posting !!!! and use too much of these !!!



What are you talking about???????????????

LOL. I just love it when people are using all caps, saying hi with 10 explimation (cant spell) points, and all. It's great. Just make se wanna
Old 04-21-2005, 08:36 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Bagger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Colemanfu
12.5 all the way! Why do you air down off road- bigger contact patch. Why not start wider?
This was my thinking too, regarding a wider tire, until I read a write up from a very knowledgeable guy. It took me a few times to understand it, but "deformation" will be greater with a narrower tire, under the same amount of weight and conditions. With less width to spread out, the tire will wrap around an object more, where a wider tire will spread out over the object more. It makes sense with a visual. I'm sure Scott won't mind me sharing this if it helps clear up some misconceptions -

The Impact of Tire Width on Traction

and a visual -
Old 04-21-2005, 08:59 AM
  #20  
Contributing Member
 
AxleIke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Bagger
This was my thinking too, regarding a wider tire, until I read a write up from a very knowledgeable guy. It took me a few times to understand it, but "deformation" will be greater with a narrower tire, under the same amount of weight and conditions. With less width to spread out, the tire will wrap around an object more, where a wider tire will spread out over the object more. It makes sense with a visual. I'm sure Scott won't mind me sharing this if it helps clear up some misconceptions -

The Impact of Tire Width on Traction

and a visual -
This is very true. A wide tire is better on sand and mud, because it spreads the weight over a larger surface area, making the truck "float". People air down to get the tire to deform better over obstacles. So, a narrower tire just has to air down less, making the tire less likely to slip a bead.


Quick Reply: What's your opinion, 33x12.5 or 33x10.5



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:21 AM.