|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Manual vs Auto
so....i have the opportunity to also swap in an auto tranny but wanted some input on that. i have a 5spd and never considered an auto til a conversation i had with someone. it is my daily driver, plan to keep her forever, plan to SAS, and most of the wheeln will be trails/rocks/beach....
pros / cons of going auto? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: grass valley, ca
Posts: 901
|
auto
pros: easy to use can do brake stances Con: not as reliable loss of power manual Pros: fun to drive power reliable easy to bump it up rocks Cons: u have to shift?
__________________
1997 Toyota 4x4 SR5 4runner 3.4 auto Toytec 3 inch coil spring Lift Trail Gear Rock Sliders Maxxis Bighorn M/T's Amp Custom Rims Cobra CB, 5ft Firestik KC Daylighters http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3008195 Near Future List Bumpers Lockers 1st Gen Roll Bar Winning the Lottery? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Grass Valley, CA
Posts: 596
|
Ill trade you. Autos suck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Merritt Island FL
Posts: 547
|
here are the 4 most important things to consider
1. manual fun 2 auto very boring 3. M.anual= Man that think is a lot faster then my auto 4. A.uto= Ass kicked by a manual (plus they are girly)
__________________
96 tacoma stock 2.7L, 5speed, manual locking hubs, 31x10.50 cobra cb GO GATORS Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
if im on the rocks, am i more prone to breakage with a manual or an auto?
i agree 100% with fun and fast factor, relibility, less hp watsed, girly vs arrggggg.....i totally agree there. do any of you run out of revs while on a tricky climb? would an auto even remedy having to shift in that situation? i dont have much experience on rocks, so i am open to being schooled. just for the record...i am a 5spd man but someone brought the point about shifting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: I'm an Ohio boy!
Posts: 1,195
|
I don't know much about rocks, but I would say that neither
has more of a chance breaking because of rocks. However, I would asume that a manual would still be desired over an auto simply because its a simpler design, meaning its stronger and more reliable. Plus, like stated above, a manual allows for greater likelyhood (sp?) of making through a run, with the ability to bump it up and such, as well as being able to play around with the clutch. I personally would never want an auto on the trail, although I know many who prefer it.
__________________
The Stable... 2002 Toyota Tundra SR5 AccCab V8 4WD 1992 Toyota Truck DLX Xcab V6 5-speed 4WD 1995 Honda Accord LX 4 door I4 Check out my sweet myspace |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Merritt Island FL
Posts: 547
|
As stated above you will not stall with a auto. But with a manual when rock crawling it has no
slippage due to the fact of not having a torque converter your the one that controls slippage. So that means as much power as you want to the tires as needed. None loss in the clutch packs, hydrolic fluid and other crap in an auto. Everybody stalls when rock crawling its a fact of life. Also when you over heat your auto and burn everything up that is a lot of money to repair. Where overheating a manual is no issue cause it doesn't happen. And if failure happens in a manual it is much cheaper to fix and much more do able by yourself
__________________
96 tacoma stock 2.7L, 5speed, manual locking hubs, 31x10.50 cobra cb GO GATORS Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
ok, good info.
one thing though, in terms of breakage, i was more referring to other parts namely brifs or cvs, inners or whatever due to exactly that power being less restricted. i suppose it's foot control. like i said, i had never considered an auto prior to that conversation i had. i appreciate all the input guys, thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: I'm an Ohio boy!
Posts: 1,195
|
Out of curiosity, what points were brought up in this conversation?
If you don't mind posting your personal life on the internet to complete strangers, of course.. ![]()
__________________
The Stable... 2002 Toyota Tundra SR5 AccCab V8 4WD 1992 Toyota Truck DLX Xcab V6 5-speed 4WD 1995 Honda Accord LX 4 door I4 Check out my sweet myspace |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
basically.....
all the points brought up in this thread were discussed as well as being stuck in tricky spots. we talked about climbing a steep incline a the possible need to shift. and how some rigs with autos and duals seem to just crawl right over stuff. i also imagine, you're also on the fat pedal a bit too cause the truck'll wanna just keep crawln while in gear. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Manual or Auto 3.4L same? | Chuki | 95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners | 13 | 07-02-2007 12:47 AM |
| Auto to Manual? | bear92 | 84-85 Trucks & 4Runners | 10 | 03-23-2007 06:10 PM |
| 2.7 vs 3.4? Manual vs. Auto? | Tokyota | General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related) | 10 | 02-21-2006 06:43 PM |
| Auto Or Manual? | Tacoma750 | Offroad Tech | 11 | 03-15-2005 11:59 AM |
| Auto or manual, which is best? | Idaho_Jim | 95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners | 20 | 01-28-2005 07:09 AM |