Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

BJ Spacers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2007, 12:36 PM
  #41  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
liferunner2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Elripster,

Whenever you get that part number info. could you send it to me, I would be much obliged. Thank you Sir.

Chris

Edit: Ah, you were editing while I was posting, now I am editing. They both have the same length of travel? Which way does the one you have now limit, too long or too short?

Edit #2: Ah, I just read your post again, too short and the other is a half inch longer. My mistake.

Last edited by liferunner2; 12-05-2007 at 12:41 PM.
Old 12-05-2007, 12:46 PM
  #42  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
liferunner2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At Downey they have a spring application chart for these shocks and they say 8434, front and 8250, rear for 1.5'' lift. Also, on their chart do you know what the D in the part number implies?

http://www.downeyoff-road.com/Suspen...Absorbers.html

Chris
Old 12-05-2007, 12:49 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
elripster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Plainfield, IL
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I'll post the correct part number here and on our website.

Frank
Old 12-05-2007, 03:33 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
elripster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Plainfield, IL
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The correct Doetsch Tech p/n's are 3078, 8069, 9069.

Frank
Old 12-05-2007, 04:01 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
GenXr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Elripster and others, thanks for this thread, it is very helpful and mirrors the direction I wish to take my truck.

Subscribed!
Old 12-05-2007, 04:25 PM
  #46  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
liferunner2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by elripster
The correct Doetsch Tech p/n's are 3078, 8069, 9069.

Frank
Elripster,

Thanks for the info. By the way, which PN is for which part, I was only buying two PN's before, front and rear shocks. What is the third # for? Also, are all of these parts still in that pre-runner series of shocks?

Chris

Edit: Went to DT's website, helped in figuring out the 3000,8000,9000 stuff. Which series are you getting? I have to call and change my order tomorrow morning before the wrong Pre-Runners end up on my doorstep. Thanks again.

Last edited by liferunner2; 12-05-2007 at 04:33 PM.
Old 12-05-2007, 04:38 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
f4stunna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central MA
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes, thank you guys as well

im going to be ordering the complete OME kit less the torsion bars and some ball joint spacers
Old 12-05-2007, 04:40 PM
  #48  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
liferunner2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also, PN 8069 & 9069 I see are the stem/hoop for the fronts. The rear hoop/hoop are 8052 & 9052, I believe. Same size just different mounts.

Chris
Old 12-28-2007, 09:11 AM
  #49  
Registered User
 
Gator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL.
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was reading over this and many other threads regarding Ball Joint Spacers and have come close to finding my answer, but not directly.

What would the harm be in using 1-1/2" BJS and doing a Torsion Crank for about another 1-1/2" of lift in the front? I have a 94 with manual hubs that only get locked when heading off road. I'm not overly worried about a "Cadillac ride", but don't want to end up breaking something needlessly.

Last edited by Gator; 12-28-2007 at 09:14 AM.
Old 12-28-2007, 09:24 AM
  #50  
Contributing Member
 
AxleIke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
As long as you wheel mildly, and can still align the truck, you'd be fine. If you wheel harder stuff, you will destroy steering right and left. I had zero torsion bar crank, and just the bj spacers, and was spitting out steering stuff every trip. Now, with my torsion bars relaxed, so that the truck is back at stock height, My truck keeps itself together, for the most part.
Old 12-28-2007, 09:33 AM
  #51  
Registered User
 
Gator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL.
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not trying to sound ignorant here, but please explain more about your steering issues you experienced.

Am I understanding you correctly in that you experienced these problems with nothing more than BJS?
Old 12-28-2007, 10:10 AM
  #52  
Contributing Member
 
AxleIke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
No.

That was all the lift I had.

33's, two lockers, 100:1 Crawl ratio, and some seriously rough trails had a lot to do with it. However, Now that I've relaxed the torsion bars, I no longer have the problems. Nothing else has changed. Relaxed back to stock, and it stays together.

As for the issues: pretzeled tie rod ends, bent center link, and more bent idler arms than I care to remember. Flygtenstein has the best picture to describe it. This happened fairly frequently.



Old 12-28-2007, 10:34 AM
  #53  
Registered User
 
Gator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL.
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you brought me back to my reason for researching this to begin with. You mentioned you were running 33's, how did they do after uncranking the torsion bars with nothing more than the BJS's? Did you have any clearance issues? I am looking to put 33's under my ride, but was concerned about clearance.

I have also read about issues with lockers in IFS setups causing steering issues. Were you running a locker in the front or was it a LSD? Do you think this contributed to the problems you had?

I hate to be a pest, but you just happen to have gone through what I want to avoid with a similar set up to what I have been researching.
Old 12-28-2007, 10:40 AM
  #54  
Registered User
 
Gator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL.
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BTW, that first photo should have made the cover of the 2008 calendar! A real turn on to those who say "If you ain't breakin something, you ain't wheelin!"
Old 12-28-2007, 11:40 AM
  #55  
Contributing Member
 
AxleIke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
No worries man. I don't consider it pesky at all. Happy to help.

I have two ARB's. I ran an LSD in the rear for a while and hated it.

My 33's are fine. No problems. You can put a 33x10.50 on stock. Not the 12.50 though. Lots of clearance problems there. However, I did hammer my pinchweld flat. So, you'll have to do that.

I'm building DOM steering to fix my steering problems.

However, I also ran several easy trails where the front was never locked. So, open front end. I bent two idlers that way.

The other failures were on hard trails, and with the front locked.

As I said, if you don't see a lot of rocks, and aren't on very difficult trails, I think you're steering will be fine. If you're concerned, I'd say that the idler is the easiest thing to break. Get a set of Brass Bushings for it, and a brace from downey. I would imagine you'll be fine there.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4x4YOTA
Axles - Suspensions - Tires - Wheels
2
08-23-2016 09:08 AM
89YodaRunner
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
09-30-2015 02:18 PM
JookUpVandetti
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
10
09-30-2015 08:58 AM
4runnerFireman
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
2
09-29-2015 06:24 AM
crash813
Axles - Suspensions - Tires - Wheels
0
09-27-2015 07:15 AM



Quick Reply: BJ Spacers



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:32 PM.