95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Would you consider a 3rd gen 4runner with 300k miles?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 06:21 AM
  #1  
Flaco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Would you consider a 3rd gen 4runner with 300k miles?

Saw an ad for a ’96 4runner SR5, 5sp with 290k miles for $2300. I thought briefly about buying it and selling my ’96 auto with about half the mileage, figuring that would leave me with about $4000 to play with and make it into a trail rig.

The ad says it “has had some engine work done at some point” which I am guessing means there are no records. It also says it needs new rotors and calipers and that the rear bumper is rusted. Those things aren’t too bad themselves but they do make me wonder about the condition of the rest of the vehicle regarding rust and how well it has been maintained.

I decided not to buy it because I figure it would probably take between $1-2k to fix it up, and that’s if it doesn’t need a new or rebuilt engine. If it does, then I would be pretty close to where I started $-wise. And I am not going to trust the owner’s word that it “has had some engine work done at some point.”

So the point of this rambling post is: would you consider buying a 3rd gen with 290k miles? I have seen a lot of people say “these vehicles are good for 300k miles.” Well what about after that?

My answer in this case is no because you can buy one like mine with half the mileage and probably much better maintenance history for about the same net price as buying this one and fixing it up. Now it might be a different story if there were records of the engine being rebuilt within the last 100k miles or so. But what else will need to be rebuilt or replaced?
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 06:26 AM
  #2  
MTL_4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 3
From: Montreal, QC Canada
I think you basically ended up answering your own question.

.....the answer is yes I would consider it, but it would depend on the vehicle maintenance history.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 06:31 AM
  #3  
bamachem's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
hell, with a 3.4L and a 5-speed, and for a trail rig, who cares if what you want is a 3rd gen. that's the cheapest you'll get a 3rd gen for sure. all i'd do is a fluid swap and a timing belt with water pump and call it good - after fixing the brakes of course. after that, you can go nuts with some lockers/gears and wheels/tires/lift...

however, if you want a dedicated trail rig, then i'd personally get an early 2nd gen - 1990 or 1991 for the same price - with a 4-banger and automatic trans. then do an axle swap and rear leafs with lockers and gears, add tires and then go to town.

Last edited by bamachem; Sep 12, 2006 at 06:33 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 07:11 AM
  #4  
cackalak han's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Is the seller the original owner? I'm guessing no. If that's the case, and there is no maintenance history, you could be in a world of hurt.

I'm just confused as to why you're wanting to sell a 96 4Runner with 150k miles for another 96 with 300k? You probably know the in's and out's of your current rig, which in my opinion, can't put a price tag on.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 07:31 AM
  #5  
mastacox's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 2
From: Fort Worth, TX
I'd stick with your current '96, or get an "older" rig with significantly less miles. 300K miles with no maitinence records is a big risk IMO, you basically are going to need to plan on doing about 2K-3K of work to get the thing in perfect running condition again...
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 07:39 AM
  #6  
Flaco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by MTL_4runner
I think you basically ended up answering your own question.
Yeha, MTL, I already knew my answer in this particular situation, at least until Andy chimed in...

Originally Posted by bamachem
hell, with a 3.4L and a 5-speed, and for a trail rig, who cares if what you want is a 3rd gen. that's the cheapest you'll get a 3rd gen for sure. all i'd do is a fluid swap and a timing belt with water pump and call it good - after fixing the brakes of course. after that, you can go nuts with some lockers/gears and wheels/tires/lift...

however, if you want a dedicated trail rig, then i'd personally get an early 2nd gen - 1990 or 1991 for the same price - with a 4-banger and automatic trans. then do an axle swap and rear leafs with lockers and gears, add tires and then go to town.
Dangit -- now you got me thinking about it again!

Actually I had debated a while back selling the 3rd gen and getting a 1st gen for a trail rig but decided that a trail rig really wasn't really what I needed or wanted. I like to be able to take highway trips in comfort to go camping or to the beach or wherever. Plus I'm still new to offroading so it will probably be a while before I'll want to do more than mine can handle.

Originally Posted by p nut
Is the seller the original owner? I'm guessing no. If that's the case, and there is no maintenance history, you could be in a world of hurt.

I'm just confused as to why you're wanting to sell a 96 4Runner with 150k miles for another 96 with 300k? You probably know the in's and out's of your current rig, which in my opinion, can't put a price tag on.
I never called so I don't know any more than what is in the ad. Like I said I only briefly considered it until my reasoning kicked in.

I guess I was mainly wanting to hear people's opinions on the longevity of 3rd gens past 300k miles. Like I said, I have seen a lot of people say that they are good for at least 300k miles if they are properly maintained, but I was kind of wondering what would need to be done to extend the life past that. I know that a lot will depend on the history of the vehicle and maintenance.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 02:02 PM
  #7  
kcebes's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Buy it and drop an LS1 engine into it.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 02:39 PM
  #8  
BajaRunner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,122
Likes: 6
From: 5th Gen San Diegan, California
300k is a good amount of mileage. It would be benificial if you knew your way around tools and engines.

If your worried about the odometer, just take it out and roll back the numbers to 150k
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 02:48 PM
  #9  
Caffeine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada
If I owned a reliable 4runner with 300,000 miles on it, I wouldn't part with it for that amount unless I knew it was falling apart.

Chances are pretty good the current owner thinks that too.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 03:44 AM
  #10  
Potomacduck's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: New Market, MD
Ask the seller if you can have an engine "leak-down test" done on it. That will allow you to properly access the condition of the engine.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AustinTaco
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
6
Aug 22, 2022 10:45 AM
TNRunner88
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
Jul 1, 2015 08:00 PM
Niameyrider
Offroad Tech
0
Jun 25, 2015 05:50 AM
infinityisfive
Other Makes Cars/Trucks
0
Jun 16, 2015 06:51 PM
westbound
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
2
Jun 7, 2002 03:30 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:13 AM.