Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Zuk mod on my 1987 4Runner using TJ springs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2012 | 11:02 AM
  #1  
Rickstwowheels's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Zuk mod on my 1987 4Runner using TJ springs

I found a generous local Jeep guy who let me have his old TJ springs for free. I used the rears because they are shorter to start with, and (I assumed) a softer spring rate since the front of a TJ is much heavier than the back. I did not want them overly tall or firm because I am hoping to get a soft top in the Spring and that will reduce the weight of my rear end a good bit. The two springs were roughly the same height, but I did not measure them. I started by cutting about this much off each spring to get them to fit over the top (metal) bump stop.

Then I supported the truck by the frame, removed the tires and let the suspension sag (one side at the time, if it matters). I have spring compressors ($10 pair from HF), and so it was a very simple matter of compressing them and putting them in place. I got about two inches of lift out of this mod.
Before:

After:
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 02:48 PM
  #2  
derockus's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: GWS,Colorado
Gotta love the no-cut ZUK mod. I used TJ front springs cut to 12". Might be a little stiff but i'd prefer it to be stiff when empty and not sagging when I'm loaded up. Nice job
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 03:56 AM
  #3  
Rickstwowheels's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by derockus
Gotta love the no-cut ZUK mod. I used TJ front springs cut to 12". Might be a little stiff but i'd prefer it to be stiff when empty and not sagging when I'm loaded up. Nice job
Good point, the front springs are not progressive and I am sure they provide a greater weight capacity. I am about to lose the hard top and lighten my load so the softer progressive spring was the one for me. I cannot even tell a difference in the ride.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 07:31 AM
  #4  
derockus's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: GWS,Colorado
Originally Posted by Rickstwowheels
Good point, the front springs are not progressive and I am sure they provide a greater weight capacity. I am about to lose the hard top and lighten my load so the softer progressive spring was the one for me. I cannot even tell a difference in the ride.
And if you change your mind they're easy to swap out!
Reply
Old May 31, 2013 | 07:16 PM
  #5  
Roark's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, TN
Originally Posted by Rickstwowheels
I found a generous local Jeep guy who let me have his old TJ springs for free. I used the rears because they are shorter to start with, and (I assumed) a softer spring rate since the front of a TJ is much heavier than the back. I did not want them overly tall or firm because I am hoping to get a soft top in the Spring and that will reduce the weight of my rear end a good bit. The two springs were roughly the same height, but I did not measure them. I started by cutting about this much off each spring to get them to fit over the top (metal) bump stop.

Then I supported the truck by the frame, removed the tires and let the suspension sag (one side at the time, if it matters). I have spring compressors ($10 pair from HF), and so it was a very simple matter of compressing them and putting them in place. I got about two inches of lift out of this mod.
Before:

After:
Are those 33 x 10.5 BFGs?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
87turboPA
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
Jul 12, 2015 07:49 AM
icentropy
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
10
Jul 11, 2015 07:21 AM
shar
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
Jul 9, 2015 12:38 PM
Nickdigg
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
Jul 7, 2015 06:04 AM
toyoda8488
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
2
Jul 5, 2015 10:18 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:04 AM.