95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Why shouldn't I use platinum plugs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 02:31 PM
  #21  
bob200587's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,546
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by MTL_4runner
BTW.....the stock plugs (NGK/Denso) in a 3.4L are dual electrode.

ah, thanks for the correction since I would have no way of knowing that.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 04:02 PM
  #22  
Mr. Bob's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver BC
Well, I am very familiar with Fords, and I will say that all DIS fords when combined with Bosch plugs end up with all kinds of drivability issues.... Some of the older ones are OK, but OK is all I will go... Autolite ( OE Ford ) and NGK are the safe bets..... Same as Chrysler... Champion or NGK.... and GM, AC Delco or NGK....

But on the flip side, If I owned a VW, or MB or BMW... I would say Bosch is a great product!

Just my thoughts........
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 12:47 AM
  #23  
jct61765's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Rindge, NH
My wife had a Nissan pickup with the v6. I put the Bosch Platinum +4's in and got almost 4mpg, went from around 15 to 19 mpg.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 01:18 AM
  #24  
surf4runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,476
Likes: 1
From: so.cal
ive had the bosch +2 in for over 20K mi and have not seen a decrease in perf or mileage. very little change over what was in there before (???).
i lik them in the 22re, but not in a blazer (i traded it for the runner ) or in my 510. ive personally noticed that the +2 worked better in a FI vs carb.

that being said, when the times comes i will go w/ the ngk. its whats in the 510. ill try to remember to when i do
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 06:01 AM
  #25  
DavidA's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
For our 3.4's the Iridium plugs are single electrode.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 09:39 AM
  #26  
MTL_4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 3
From: Montreal, QC Canada
Originally Posted by DavidA
For our 3.4's the Iridium plugs are single electrode.
It should be noted that those are not the stock plugs for that motor.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 11:19 AM
  #27  
rowdy4runnin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: ABQ/Ft. Collins
i might be mistaken but it seems like the dual electrode idea is a gimmick. electricity takes the path of least resistance, so it will chose ONE of the electrodes not split between two. i installed the dual e boschs and after a month the truck ran like crap. took it to the shop and they put in stock single ones and it runs great now.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 11:22 AM
  #28  
Localmotion's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by rowdy4runnin
i might be mistaken but it seems like the dual electrode idea is a gimmick. electricity takes the path of least resistance, so it will chose ONE of the electrodes not split between two. i installed the dual e boschs and after a month the truck ran like crap. took it to the shop and they put in stock single ones and it runs great now.
hmm...arent the stock plugs duals? if it was pointless, why would the very very very very very very very smart engineers at Toyota use them????
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 11:30 AM
  #29  
rowdy4runnin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: ABQ/Ft. Collins
i dont know i was just brainstorming. it just makes sense to me that two would be pointless. am i completely wrong in this thinking? anyone with an electric background wanna chime in?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 12:16 PM
  #30  
DavidA's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
The dual electrodes appear to be there to generate more spark... BUT the Iridium design is designed to do the same thing with a smaller primary electrode and different materials.

What does size have to do with it? Less voltage is required for a smaller center electrode and results in better ignitability. The smaller the electrode, the more centralized the electrical potential is around the electrode tip. The required voltage can be reduced because the level of the electric field is made stronger and local insulation (air gap and electrode surface oxidation) breaks down more easily. The bottom line is that it takes approximately 5,000 volts less to fire a Denso Iridium Power spark plug versus a conventional platinum spark plug.

So why not just make a smaller diameter electrode spark plug out of platinum? It just wouldn't last. The small-diameter center electrode reaches much higher temperatures. Iridium's melting point is 700 degrees C higher than platinum, and laboratory tests have shown that with the same-size electrode iridium, plugs were four to five times as resistant to wear as platinum. Much of Denso's R&D went into finding the perfect iridium alloy (90% iridium, 10% rhodium) that would provide 200,000 miles of service, and working out the manufacturing process to "draw" the electrode into the extremely small .4mm-diameter wire.
http://www.globaldenso.com/PLUG/power/features.html

Last edited by DavidA; Mar 31, 2006 at 12:24 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 12:29 PM
  #31  
DavidA's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
More interesting info from the Denso website: http://www.globaldenso.com/PLUG/config/index2.html

Semi-Surface Double Electrode Plug
(Example) W20ETR-S11
・ A double ground electrode with a 1mm gap is used.
・ Using a short opposed-type dual ground electrode, excellent durability is obtained.
・ Improved ignitability because it is fully projected.
・ With the new addition of a supplementary gap, fouling resistance is improved.
・ Used for Toyota and Daihatsu.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 12:33 PM
  #32  
DavidA's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
I found the answer on using Single electrode vs. Dual Electrode and Iridium.

http://www.globaldenso.com/PLUG/qa/tech/qa_8.html

Can I replace my double, triple, or quadruple electrode plugs to Iridium Power or Iridium Tough?

This is possible. The reason: because of the 0.4mm center electrode in Iridium Power and Iridium Tough plugs, they have a lower spark voltage compared to double, triple, and quadruple electrode plugs. Please refer to the Standard Resistor Model Quick Chart.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 11:49 AM
  #33  
MTL_4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 3
From: Montreal, QC Canada
Originally Posted by rowdy4runnin
i might be mistaken but it seems like the dual electrode idea is a gimmick. electricity takes the path of least resistance, so it will chose ONE of the electrodes not split between two. i installed the dual e boschs and after a month the truck ran like crap. took it to the shop and they put in stock single ones and it runs great now.
You guys are also missing the wear aspect of plugs as well. The plug gaps widen over the plugs lifetime so by having the dual electrode design it also extends the life of the plug and reduces the maintenance interval on them as well. The irridiums get away with a single tip design because the electrode wears very slowly (ie the gap grows very slowly) on those, but the material to make them is not cheap either.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 12:17 PM
  #34  
DavidA's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
I just caught the fact that Denso said the Iridiums were designed for up to 200,000 miles of service life. That is pretty neat. So if you take the time you spend swapping out plugs every 30+k and the cost of the plugs...plus the fact that the Iridums require less voltage to ignite...supposely better combustion, etc...I think they are a good deal. Especially since they are less than $8 each now.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 03:32 PM
  #35  
rugerm44's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
My 02 3.4 came from the factory with denso on one side and ngk on the othere.Go figure.I replaced them with ngk dual electrode plugs.Runs like a champ.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #36  
BeachRNR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: NY
Do you guy's with the Denso iridium feel as if you need to run a higher octane?
When I put 87 in mine it runs ĊĊĊĊty but when I go up to 89 or 92 it is ten times better.
Do the iridiums require a higher octane?
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 05:30 PM
  #37  
DavidA's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX
I run 87 all the time. As far as I know they do not require it.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 06:57 AM
  #38  
MTL_4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 3
From: Montreal, QC Canada
Originally Posted by DavidA
I just caught the fact that Denso said the Iridiums were designed for up to 200,000 miles of service life. That is pretty neat. So if you take the time you spend swapping out plugs every 30+k and the cost of the plugs...plus the fact that the Iridums require less voltage to ignite...supposely better combustion, etc...I think they are a good deal. Especially since they are less than $8 each now.
Yep, good stuff! I went to change the plugs on my Honda Civic and got quite a shock that the dealer wanted $20 each x4! So I went home and pulled them to have a look and see if I really needed to replace them and low an behold they were iridiums. So there are some vehicles coming from the factory with these as OEM too. Needless to say I decided to wait to replace them.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 07:53 AM
  #39  
emptypockets's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
From: Spencer, Iowa
I run 89 octane gas (10% ethanol) all the time with no problems whatsoever. Even though the iridiums recommend a 200k mileage change interval, I would change them more often than that. No matter what plug I run, I'll never run them longer than 50-60,000 miles. Maybe iridiums would last for 100k?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2007 | 08:57 AM
  #40  
BOSTON4RUNNER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by emptypockets
Two problems I noticed with Bosch platinum +4 plugs. 1). Decreased performance. When the plugs were in, my '02 3.4 hesitated, idled irradically and stumbled when under hard acceleration. 2). Decreased MPG. When I installed the platinums, my mpg went from 17-18 to 14-15...a pretty big difference when gas is so expensive. I've put in new NGK's dual electrode and my mpg is even better than before!

I kept my Bosch Platinum +4's in for about 3000 miles and found they're among the worst plugs out there. Stay with the stock NGK's: they perform better, last longer and will give you better mpg!
I am having this same problem

I going to put Denso's in it tonight
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:31 PM.