95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

New Bridgestone Revos, finally.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 12:14 PM
  #41  
Citykid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 413
Likes: 2
From: St. Augustine, FL
Just spoke with TireRack. Said a lot of guys go with the 75s over the stock 70s, but couldn't guaranty no rubbing. Looks like that's the way I'm going.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 01:17 PM
  #42  
CynicX's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Van91DSM
Are the Revo's a decent offroad tire? I'm looking at them as well. I think the reviews at tire rack are mostly soccer moms and the like. My BFG A/T's never let me down when I had them on my '85 back in the early '90's, but I'm considering the Revo's. It's either the BFG A/T's or the Revo's, although one friend is telling me that the Pirelli Scorpion is very good, but I'm thinking that the Scorps probably suck and would get stuck in sand/mud faster than either the Revo or the BFG A/T's. Any opinions on how the Revo's hold against these two tires? I'm looking at 265/75/16's.
Never go by tirerack specs. I mean come on, people on here are buying tires based on the specs tire rack gives? Thats crazy.

You can take some of the best rain tires on tirerack and the wet traction rating will be 8.4. Then you can take a tire that everyone says is bad in the rain, such as the BFG AT (what I have), and tire rack says the wet traction is 8.1.

Or how about a pure dry traction racing tire vs the BFG AT in dry traction. Shouldnt even be on the same scale right? Nope, BFG GForce - 9.5 BFG AT Offroad - 8.9.

As far as I'm concerned thats the worst rating system ever if the difference between best and worst is .3-.6 .
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 02:00 PM
  #43  
jvangun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, KS
Additional Pix

Thundercloud, here are some additional pix of the Revo's as requested.





Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 06:39 PM
  #44  
THUNDER CLOUD's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: IOWA
[QUOTE=jvangun]Thundercloud, here are some additional pix of the Revo's as requested.


Thanks for doing that. You sold me. That looks awsome. It will be the "P" 75's for me.

You have had them for a little while, any news on gas mileage?
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 05:02 AM
  #45  
jvangun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, KS
Honestly, have not even started tracking it yet. I need to do so though. Just threw in a new k&n and will see what I get.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 05:14 AM
  #46  
bamachem's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by jvangun
Thundercloud, I was very leary about doing anything to this truck such as changing from the factory tire size, however, going from 265/70/16 to 265/75/16 only throws my spedometer off about 3mph at 80!!! Check it out. I was nervous about going a hair bigger but, glad I did. The little extra really fills up the extra wheel well space. If you want anymore pix, let me know.

Speedometer Calibrator
http://www.csgnetwork.com/speedocalibcalc.html
actually, if you check w/ a GPS, a STOCK runner is about 3% slower than indicated. going to a 285/75-16 goes up by about 3% in diameter, actually making your speedometer dead on. the odometer then becomes about 3% short on it's indicated distance, so take that into account when you calculate MPG's (add 3% to your calculated MPG).

you will drop about 1 to 1.5 MPG when going up to the 285/75-16's over the 285/70-16's.

if you want more clearance, you can get a 1" 4Crawler Body Lift for about $150 and install it yourself in less than 3 hours. it's very easy and will give you more clearance to prevent rubbing on the pinch weld.

i have a total of 3.5" of lift and run 305/70-16's (big 33's) and i regeared to 4.56's. i'm getting 18 MPG @ 75 MPH and 2450 RPM on the interstate (for comparison)....

Last edited by bamachem; Oct 10, 2005 at 05:16 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 05:26 AM
  #47  
MTL_4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 3
From: Montreal, QC Canada
Originally Posted by bamachem
you will drop about 1 to 1.5 MPG when going up to the 285/75-16's over the 285/70-16's.

i have a total of 3.5" of lift and run 305/70-16's (big 33's) and i regeared to 4.56's. i'm getting 18 MPG @ 75 MPH and 2450 RPM on the interstate (for comparison)....
Could be a bit more than 1-1.5 MPG more since mine gets about 21 MPG (calculated) on average with stock P265/70R16's.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 05:47 AM
  #48  
bamachem's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
with my 4WD limited, i went from about 18.5 to about 17 with the jump. then with 285's i went to 16. added the supercharger and it went to 17. after a regear, pulling the supercharger and going up to 305's, i'm back up to 18.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 08:39 AM
  #49  
MTL_4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 3
From: Montreal, QC Canada
Originally Posted by bamachem
with my 4WD limited, i went from about 18.5 to about 17 with the jump. then with 285's i went to 16. added the supercharger and it went to 17. after a regear, pulling the supercharger and going up to 305's, i'm back up to 18.
The first jump you did was 265/70's to 265/75's?

Nice to know a S/C will actually add MPG.....might have to consider that.
I forget, did you pull the S/C for cost of running premuim or something else?
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 09:00 AM
  #50  
bamachem's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by MTL_4runner
The first jump you did was 265/70's to 265/75's?

Nice to know a S/C will actually add MPG.....might have to consider that.
I forget, did you pull the S/C for cost of running premuim or something else?
at the time, i was driving it about 115 miles a day, 5 days a week (before i got the '90 accord) and every little bit i could save on gas would help. not only that, but i was already having the regear and the front locked, so with the regear, the SC wasn't needed as much and selling it pretty much paid for the entire regear & locking of the front including labor.

by selling it and regearing, i not only dropped $0.20 per gallon off my BIG fuel bill, but i also gained a MPG in the process and didn't loose any $ out of pocket other than what had already been spent on the SC (about $600 total)...
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 09:22 AM
  #51  
jvangun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, KS
Bamachem, You mention something about the changes from 285/70 to 28575's and the results I will see. I went from 265/70 to 265/75. Now, being that the second number is the percent of the first number (70% of 265 vs. 75% of 265) I would probably not see the same change as if I was running 285's..... correct?
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 09:35 AM
  #52  
bamachem's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
my progression:

275/70-16's (landcruiser size - was on the runner when i got it)
265/70-16's (swapped from other runner before i sold it)
265/75-16's Nitto Terra Grapplers
285/75-16's Goodyear MT/R's
305/70-16's Goodyear MT/R's


265mm * 0.70 = 185.5mm, 185.5mm = 7.3031", (7.3031" * 2)+16 = 30.6062"

265mm * 0.75 = 198.8mm, 198.8mm = 7.8248", (7.8248" * 2)+16 = 31.6496"

(31.6496" - 30.6062") / 30.6062" = 0.03409 or 3.4% difference in circumference & diameter

that equated to a ~1.5 MPG loss for me.

Last edited by bamachem; Oct 10, 2005 at 09:41 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 01:59 AM
  #53  
loyalconvert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: woodinville
i've noticed that there's almost no mention of the les schwab wild country txr on this board. granted, they're not the most aggressive tread out there, but they do pretty damn well in snow and ice from my experience. a bit loud on dry pavement though. anybody else have any opinions about them?
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 09:43 PM
  #54  
Citykid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 413
Likes: 2
From: St. Augustine, FL
Well, I finally had them put on my truck. Got bent over for the Tire Balancing & Allignment though.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 09:55 PM
  #55  
Van91DSM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, Az.
After much deliberation and research, I think I'm going with some 265/75/16 BFG T/A KO's on some American racing 16x8" Outlaw II wheels. Pretty much what I ran on my '85 x-cab back in 1989. These should be on later next week I hope.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jabernat
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
8
Oct 28, 2003 10:04 AM
Gringo
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
4
Oct 8, 2003 04:33 PM
williemon
Tires & Wheels
6
Jul 3, 2003 05:47 PM
Rick F.
Tires & Wheels
5
Dec 7, 2002 04:27 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:23 AM.