Deckplate mod does nothing
#24
Maybe that is why my rig feels higher.
I blame the sticker.
I blame the sticker.
#25
Contributing Member
It does nothing to performance, ISR or deckplate only make your intake sound like it came off of a 69 Charger. you want performance just get a bigger engine or run straight off the headers as i do, THAT gives you some amazing results. Contrary to popular belief, BACK PRESSURE IS A MYTH. For 2 YEARS i have run with no restrictions on my exhaust just off the headers and the difference in power is astounding.
I just smoked a SRT4 turbo with no rear locker on the track. Add that to the 3000GT twin turbo and Datsun 240. Do not underestimate 3VZ-E, just take care of it.
I just smoked a SRT4 turbo with no rear locker on the track. Add that to the 3000GT twin turbo and Datsun 240. Do not underestimate 3VZ-E, just take care of it.
#26
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: colorado
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if someone can find a filter that compares to that old wet amsoil TS i'd go that route again--haven't found one that matches up yet. that's where my 94 really picked up response, more so than the airbox mod.
#28
A dyno that reads +/- 10hp between runs is evidence? Dynos were never meant to measure minute differences, especially fractions of a HP as you mention in your earlier post. It's like using a bathroom scale to do science experiments.
#29
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But we've seen more than one dyno showing at least a 6whp gain and I was present for 2 dyno runs from a couple of Tacos that produced 6-10whp. Of course minute diffs aren't accurate but it is proven opening a hole in the airbox does produce positive results so in the eyes of many it's worthy mod to do since it is so cheap and makes more sense than adding a $200-300 intake.
#30
1. There is very little economical sense for Toyota to put on a physically restrictive intake, as plastic is cheap, and space under the hood is plentiful. It is not logical, considering how much emphasis is placed on power in the US market. If they could so easily get crank HP up by 10, they would have surely done it, as rated power is a very serious selling point.
2. From what I tested on my 4Runner (can't speak for Tacos) there is no benefit to the deckplace mod, as there is no vacuum present prior to the air filter. This is positive, conclusive and final proof that no matter how many deckplates are put in, there will be no improvement in volumetric efficiency of the engine, and therefore no power gain whatsoever.
#31
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: the great Maine wilderness
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
^^ I agree.... I think the only thing you can really do to improve volumetric air flow, is to A) k&n or similar, filter, or
B) run ur intake to the hood or grill, and make it "ram" air....and even then, it will only help at higher speeds.
That being said.... it dont matter how much air you can pull into the motor, if you dont do anything to increase exhaust flow.... IMO the exhaust is the restrictive part of these engines.
B) run ur intake to the hood or grill, and make it "ram" air....and even then, it will only help at higher speeds.
That being said.... it dont matter how much air you can pull into the motor, if you dont do anything to increase exhaust flow.... IMO the exhaust is the restrictive part of these engines.
#32
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well,like I said it's such a cheap mod and it doesn't have a negative side effect so it's not a big deal to do it so it's not like the mod will go away no matter how much disproving one can do. I personally haven't seen any power or MPG gains but I do get a snappier throttle response and in a drag race my 4Runner is a tad quicker than my mom's '99 Limited in the 1/4 (and in all 4 runs I made against my brother) and my 4Runner has 50,000 more miles and bigger tires but I can't say the hole-in-the-airbox is winning it for me.
On the flipside I've seen no negatives from the deckplate and my MPGs are currently 17-19mpg city with my bigger tires,rack up top and I have a leadfoot. In winter those MPGs drop to a more consistent 16mpg.
On the flipside I've seen no negatives from the deckplate and my MPGs are currently 17-19mpg city with my bigger tires,rack up top and I have a leadfoot. In winter those MPGs drop to a more consistent 16mpg.
#33
Contributing Member
Just wondering what your methods were in testing to find there was no vacuum?
In vacuum, you just mean a negative pressure, or a pressure lower that atm right? What pressure difference in considered negligible?
In saying there is no vacuum in the pre filter means that the intake is not struggling for extra air volume, if it was, there would be a presence of a negative pressure?
What kind of air filter are you running? You should try (since I dont have a pressure meter) with a "high flow" filter (if they are indeed high flow?).
Interesting though... but would you still possibly accept there would be a margin of error with experimentation?
I never did feel an increase in mpg or power...but, it sounded like a good idea at the time....
Not arguing your methods or findings, just wondering more about it !
In vacuum, you just mean a negative pressure, or a pressure lower that atm right? What pressure difference in considered negligible?
In saying there is no vacuum in the pre filter means that the intake is not struggling for extra air volume, if it was, there would be a presence of a negative pressure?
What kind of air filter are you running? You should try (since I dont have a pressure meter) with a "high flow" filter (if they are indeed high flow?).
Interesting though... but would you still possibly accept there would be a margin of error with experimentation?
I never did feel an increase in mpg or power...but, it sounded like a good idea at the time....
Not arguing your methods or findings, just wondering more about it !
Last edited by BajaRunner; 07-16-2009 at 09:39 AM.
#34
1. They wanted a quiet intake for soccer moms.
2. For full power, it required a very large and loud intake that would have put off the soccer moms.
Sorry, don't buy the "deckplate/elbow/better intake makes no difference" line.
It does, I felt it and it works.
2. For full power, it required a very large and loud intake that would have put off the soccer moms.
Sorry, don't buy the "deckplate/elbow/better intake makes no difference" line.
It does, I felt it and it works.
This goes both against logic, and very scientific methods I applied to my 4Runner.
1. There is very little economical sense for Toyota to put on a physically restrictive intake, as plastic is cheap, and space under the hood is plentiful. It is not logical, considering how much emphasis is placed on power in the US market. If they could so easily get crank HP up by 10, they would have surely done it, as rated power is a very serious selling point.
2. From what I tested on my 4Runner (can't speak for Tacos) there is no benefit to the deckplace mod, as there is no vacuum present prior to the air filter. This is positive, conclusive and final proof that no matter how many deckplates are put in, there will be no improvement in volumetric efficiency of the engine, and therefore no power gain whatsoever.
1. There is very little economical sense for Toyota to put on a physically restrictive intake, as plastic is cheap, and space under the hood is plentiful. It is not logical, considering how much emphasis is placed on power in the US market. If they could so easily get crank HP up by 10, they would have surely done it, as rated power is a very serious selling point.
2. From what I tested on my 4Runner (can't speak for Tacos) there is no benefit to the deckplace mod, as there is no vacuum present prior to the air filter. This is positive, conclusive and final proof that no matter how many deckplates are put in, there will be no improvement in volumetric efficiency of the engine, and therefore no power gain whatsoever.
#35
Contributing Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: COTKU,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 11,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Something else to consider is that a deckplate or cone filter moded intake is more maintenance intensive then a stock airbox set up and lets face it the average joe or jane driver barely remembers to change the oil once in a blue moon. So it would lead to a lot more spurious warranty claims had they gone with the more efficient set up.
#36
SC4Runner, you seem to be genuinely interested, so let me address each point.
Originally Posted by SC4Runner
what your methods were in testing to find there was no vacuum?
Originally Posted by SC4Runner
In vacuum, you just mean a negative pressure, or a pressure lower that atm right? What pressure difference in considered negligible?
Originally Posted by SC4Runner
In saying there is no vacuum in the pre filter means that the intake is not struggling for extra air volume, if it was, there would be a presence of a negative pressure?
Originally Posted by SC4Runner
What kind of air filter are you running? You should try (since I dont have a pressure meter) with a "high flow" filter (if they are indeed high flow?).
Originally Posted by SC4Runner
Interesting though... but would you still possibly accept there would be a margin of error with experimentation?
Last edited by DailyDrive; 07-16-2009 at 11:24 AM.
#37
Registered User
The deckplate mod worked for my 4Runner.
I keep detailed mileage records and they clearly show a difference after doing this mod.
Power increase? Maybe, maybe not.
Fuel economy benefit? Yes, by about a maximum of 1 mpg.
Driving style plays a significant role too. I know exactly how I want the vehicle to perform and apply enough throttle to achieve that. With the deckplate mod I can apply a little less throttle to achieve the same result, hence, less fuel consumed.
The vacuum gauge needs to be positioned in the intake manifold (after the throttle) and results from multiple points in the rpm range. This is where you will get relevant data, not prior to the air filter.
I keep detailed mileage records and they clearly show a difference after doing this mod.
Power increase? Maybe, maybe not.
Fuel economy benefit? Yes, by about a maximum of 1 mpg.
Driving style plays a significant role too. I know exactly how I want the vehicle to perform and apply enough throttle to achieve that. With the deckplate mod I can apply a little less throttle to achieve the same result, hence, less fuel consumed.
The vacuum gauge needs to be positioned in the intake manifold (after the throttle) and results from multiple points in the rpm range. This is where you will get relevant data, not prior to the air filter.
#38
Registered User
Techno...good to see another from Western PA!!!! Not too many of us around.
#39
The deckplate mod worked for my 4Runner.
I keep detailed mileage records and they clearly show a difference after doing this mod.
Power increase? Maybe, maybe not.
Fuel economy benefit? Yes, by about a maximum of 1 mpg.
Driving style plays a significant role too. I know exactly how I want the vehicle to perform and apply enough throttle to achieve that. With the deckplate mod I can apply a little less throttle to achieve the same result, hence, less fuel consumed.
The vacuum gauge needs to be positioned in the intake manifold (after the throttle) and results from multiple points in the rpm range. This is where you will get relevant data, not prior to the air filter.
I keep detailed mileage records and they clearly show a difference after doing this mod.
Power increase? Maybe, maybe not.
Fuel economy benefit? Yes, by about a maximum of 1 mpg.
Driving style plays a significant role too. I know exactly how I want the vehicle to perform and apply enough throttle to achieve that. With the deckplate mod I can apply a little less throttle to achieve the same result, hence, less fuel consumed.
The vacuum gauge needs to be positioned in the intake manifold (after the throttle) and results from multiple points in the rpm range. This is where you will get relevant data, not prior to the air filter.
Bingo.