95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

3rd Gen 4Runner - Safest SUV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 09:02 PM
  #1  
khaug's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
3rd Gen 4Runner - Safest SUV

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has released statistics comparing accident death rates among a large number of 1999 - 2002 model year vehicles. The 4Runner was second best overall and the safest SUV surveyed, bested only by the previous generation Mercedes E-Class sedan.

Worst was the Chevrolet Blazer 2-door, which had a death rate almost 30 times that of the best vehicles.

Go here: http://synformix.com/xfer/sr4003.pdf for the full report.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 06:40 AM
  #2  
4mydogs's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 1
From: the beach

Thanks for posting that -- I think the study may change folk's perceptions about cars and SUVs' relative safety. For example, I know several people that drive BIG SUVs (Suburbans, Yukons) because they believe that these are the safest vehicles to be in if they're in an accident. But the Suburban death rate is nearly 4 times the 4Runner's. I printed out the article so I can share it with others.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 06:51 AM
  #3  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
I knew Runners were relatively safe but I'm glad I know how safe they are.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 06:55 AM
  #4  
lee's Avatar
lee
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
From: boston, ma
yea, thats awesome. look at the other chart... blazers are scary!

thanks for the link
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 07:01 AM
  #5  
switchback's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
The thing to remember is that there are many test that prove that the reason a lot of fatalities occur in rollover accidents is not due to the rollover itself or the cars structure, but has to do with all the cargo flying around inside the vehicle causing severe head truama. I would bet that all those big Suburbans driven by soccer moms have a lot of "junk" in there that may be part of the reason. Probably on a small part, but it is still worth noting. So, we need to keep in mind how we load our cargo, especially on 4WD adventures when we have tool boxes, air compressors, high jacks, etc. Those things are all lethal missiles.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 07:03 AM
  #6  
rimpainter.com's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 1
Since this is a .pdf, here is a trick for everyone:

Once opened, hit CTRL+L, then CTRL+3. It will be much easier to view.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 07:10 AM
  #7  
bamachem's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
wow...

my 99 4runner has 1/4 the fatality rate that my wife's 2003 (same as a 2002) Acura TL has...

her next vehicle will probally be a UZJ-100. i guess there's not enough of them to list the fatality rate accurately...
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 07:36 AM
  #8  
SkyRat's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
I find this interesting...
On the first and second charts. The Lowest Death Rate chart, only 3 cars are of American Design, 2 are Cadillacs, 1 Mercury.
On the Highest Death Rate chart only 5 are Imports. 3 are Kias, 1 Mazda, 1 Mitsubishi.
7 of the 14 on the highest death rate chart are Chevys.
Wow...
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 08:35 AM
  #9  
4RUNR's Avatar
Guest
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
From: North Pole
blazers are scary!]
Number of deaths divided by vehicles on the road? And that is to judge safety?

Why not crunch some numbers and see what vehicles get the least speeding tickets then compile a list of vehicles that can't go fast.


It's about demographics. Old ladies in Buicks are less prone to speed.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 08:44 AM
  #10  
Manioca35's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, CO
Originally Posted by 4RUNR
It's about demographics. Old ladies in Buicks are less prone to speed.
They do actually point out these types of reasons for certain discrepancies. At least at first glance, it seems to be pretty well written and researched.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 08:50 AM
  #11  
4RUNR's Avatar
Guest
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
From: North Pole
A for effort. F for methodology.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 08:53 AM
  #12  
SEAN_at_TLT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: USA
I noticed that there were more deaths in Pontiac Firebirds than in Chevy Camaros, I thought that was strange since they are the same car structurally. That does go to show that the results aren't perfect but like others have said, I am glad to know that our trucks are very safe compared to most other vehicles on the road!
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 08:53 AM
  #13  
Manioca35's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, CO
Originally Posted by 4RUNR
A for effort. F for methodology.
I say that as long as you are aware of the limitations of the way the numbers were crunched, then you can draw some good conclusions. Unfortunately not everyone is as brilliant as we are!
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #14  
SEAN_at_TLT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: USA
The 4Runner has fared well in NHTSA crash testing so that combined with this study makes for fairly substantial proof.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 09:48 AM
  #15  
Lance's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Oh
Yet my insurance went up from my 2000 Xterra to my 98 4 Runner by $160.
They said it is because statistically the 4 runner gets into more wrecks. Talk about screwing up numbers, no kidding, there only a billion more on the road. State Farm sucks.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 11:06 AM
  #16  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
My '99 was cheaper to insure than my '97 by $15 a month for some reason.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 11:36 AM
  #17  
4RUNR's Avatar
Guest
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
From: North Pole
What do car insurance rates have to do with driver fatality statistics?
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 11:40 AM
  #18  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
I think cars that do not test well affect rates since I know repair cost do but I'm sure there's info that contradicts that.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 11:54 AM
  #19  
4RUNR's Avatar
Guest
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
From: North Pole
I doubt auto insurance companies care about fatalities, unless they plan on post mortal premium hikes. Or paying to wash off the blood and returning the vehicle to surviving policy holders.

Life insurance companies, on the other hand, should care.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 12:13 PM
  #20  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
You do have medical expenses paid by your insurance and I think some policies pay out in case of death so insurance companies might care.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:48 AM.