Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

3rd Gen 4Runner - Safest SUV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2005, 09:02 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
khaug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3rd Gen 4Runner - Safest SUV

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has released statistics comparing accident death rates among a large number of 1999 - 2002 model year vehicles. The 4Runner was second best overall and the safest SUV surveyed, bested only by the previous generation Mercedes E-Class sedan.

Worst was the Chevrolet Blazer 2-door, which had a death rate almost 30 times that of the best vehicles.

Go here: http://synformix.com/xfer/sr4003.pdf for the full report.
Old 03-16-2005, 06:40 AM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
4mydogs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: the beach
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Thanks for posting that -- I think the study may change folk's perceptions about cars and SUVs' relative safety. For example, I know several people that drive BIG SUVs (Suburbans, Yukons) because they believe that these are the safest vehicles to be in if they're in an accident. But the Suburban death rate is nearly 4 times the 4Runner's. I printed out the article so I can share it with others.
Old 03-16-2005, 06:51 AM
  #3  
Contributing Member
 
X-AWDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I knew Runners were relatively safe but I'm glad I know how safe they are.
Old 03-16-2005, 06:55 AM
  #4  
lee
Contributing Member
 
lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: boston, ma
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yea, thats awesome. look at the other chart... blazers are scary!

thanks for the link
Old 03-16-2005, 07:01 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
switchback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The thing to remember is that there are many test that prove that the reason a lot of fatalities occur in rollover accidents is not due to the rollover itself or the cars structure, but has to do with all the cargo flying around inside the vehicle causing severe head truama. I would bet that all those big Suburbans driven by soccer moms have a lot of "junk" in there that may be part of the reason. Probably on a small part, but it is still worth noting. So, we need to keep in mind how we load our cargo, especially on 4WD adventures when we have tool boxes, air compressors, high jacks, etc. Those things are all lethal missiles.
Old 03-16-2005, 07:03 AM
  #6  
Contributing Member
 
rimpainter.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since this is a .pdf, here is a trick for everyone:

Once opened, hit CTRL+L, then CTRL+3. It will be much easier to view.
Old 03-16-2005, 07:10 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
bamachem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
wow...

my 99 4runner has 1/4 the fatality rate that my wife's 2003 (same as a 2002) Acura TL has...

her next vehicle will probally be a UZJ-100. i guess there's not enough of them to list the fatality rate accurately...
Old 03-16-2005, 07:36 AM
  #8  
Contributing Member
 
SkyRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find this interesting...
On the first and second charts. The Lowest Death Rate chart, only 3 cars are of American Design, 2 are Cadillacs, 1 Mercury.
On the Highest Death Rate chart only 5 are Imports. 3 are Kias, 1 Mazda, 1 Mitsubishi.
7 of the 14 on the highest death rate chart are Chevys.
Wow...
Old 03-16-2005, 08:35 AM
  #9  
Guest
 
4RUNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Pole
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
blazers are scary!]
Number of deaths divided by vehicles on the road? And that is to judge safety?

Why not crunch some numbers and see what vehicles get the least speeding tickets then compile a list of vehicles that can't go fast.


It's about demographics. Old ladies in Buicks are less prone to speed.
Old 03-16-2005, 08:44 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Manioca35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 4RUNR
It's about demographics. Old ladies in Buicks are less prone to speed.
They do actually point out these types of reasons for certain discrepancies. At least at first glance, it seems to be pretty well written and researched.
Old 03-16-2005, 08:50 AM
  #11  
Guest
 
4RUNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Pole
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A for effort. F for methodology.
Old 03-16-2005, 08:53 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
SEAN_at_TLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I noticed that there were more deaths in Pontiac Firebirds than in Chevy Camaros, I thought that was strange since they are the same car structurally. That does go to show that the results aren't perfect but like others have said, I am glad to know that our trucks are very safe compared to most other vehicles on the road!
Old 03-16-2005, 08:53 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Manioca35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 4RUNR
A for effort. F for methodology.
I say that as long as you are aware of the limitations of the way the numbers were crunched, then you can draw some good conclusions. Unfortunately not everyone is as brilliant as we are!
Old 03-16-2005, 08:59 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
SEAN_at_TLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 4Runner has fared well in NHTSA crash testing so that combined with this study makes for fairly substantial proof.
Old 03-16-2005, 09:48 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Lance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cincinnati, Oh
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yet my insurance went up from my 2000 Xterra to my 98 4 Runner by $160.
They said it is because statistically the 4 runner gets into more wrecks. Talk about screwing up numbers, no kidding, there only a billion more on the road. State Farm sucks.
Old 03-16-2005, 11:06 AM
  #16  
Contributing Member
 
X-AWDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My '99 was cheaper to insure than my '97 by $15 a month for some reason.
Old 03-16-2005, 11:36 AM
  #17  
Guest
 
4RUNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Pole
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What do car insurance rates have to do with driver fatality statistics?
Old 03-16-2005, 11:40 AM
  #18  
Contributing Member
 
X-AWDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think cars that do not test well affect rates since I know repair cost do but I'm sure there's info that contradicts that.
Old 03-16-2005, 11:54 AM
  #19  
Guest
 
4RUNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Pole
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I doubt auto insurance companies care about fatalities, unless they plan on post mortal premium hikes. Or paying to wash off the blood and returning the vehicle to surviving policy holders.

Life insurance companies, on the other hand, should care.
Old 03-16-2005, 12:13 PM
  #20  
Contributing Member
 
X-AWDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You do have medical expenses paid by your insurance and I think some policies pay out in case of death so insurance companies might care.


Quick Reply: 3rd Gen 4Runner - Safest SUV



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:02 AM.