What size tires?
#1
What size tires?
I have a 97 4Runner 4x4 and I have two sets of rims, stock 16x7 4Runner Rims and 18x8 Land Cruiser rims. I'm looking at buying a new set of all season tires and winter tires but can't decide what size to buy. I was recommended 265/70 R16 tires on the 16x8 Land Cruiser rims (BFG A/T KO's) and 265/75 R16 tires (Goodyear SilentArmors) for my winter set on my 16x7 rims. I wanted to see what all of your opinions were and if anyone has experience running Land Cruiser rims on their stock suspension. Thanks!
#2
Sure, you can run Land Cruiser wheels on your 3rd-gen 4runner just fine. I assume the LC wheels are 16x8 and not 18x8 like you first typed.
265/70R16 and 265/75R16 are common sizes on the 3rd gen. The size difference between them is pretty minimal.
For the winter set, you might consider the 235/85R16 size. It is about the same diameter as the 265/75R16 but is a good bit narrower to better cut through slush and put down good ground pressure on the snow pack for better grip. Given the same tread pattern and rubber compound, a narrower tire usually has better winter performance than a wider one. Skinny tires also do well on the highway and on the trail--you can run them all year.
AT tires like the SilentArmor and BFG all-terrain are perfectly good for running year-round. Why not simplify and pare down to just one set of rolling stock instead of two? Two sets can be a pain, with the storage, switching, and cost and complexity of keeping two sets of tires balanced and fresh instead of just one. I gave up keeping two sets a long time ago and haven't looked back.
265/70R16 and 265/75R16 are common sizes on the 3rd gen. The size difference between them is pretty minimal.
For the winter set, you might consider the 235/85R16 size. It is about the same diameter as the 265/75R16 but is a good bit narrower to better cut through slush and put down good ground pressure on the snow pack for better grip. Given the same tread pattern and rubber compound, a narrower tire usually has better winter performance than a wider one. Skinny tires also do well on the highway and on the trail--you can run them all year.
AT tires like the SilentArmor and BFG all-terrain are perfectly good for running year-round. Why not simplify and pare down to just one set of rolling stock instead of two? Two sets can be a pain, with the storage, switching, and cost and complexity of keeping two sets of tires balanced and fresh instead of just one. I gave up keeping two sets a long time ago and haven't looked back.
Last edited by YoungFeller; Nov 4, 2013 at 10:10 AM.
#3
Sure, you can run Land Cruiser wheels on your 3rd-gen 4runner just fine. I assume the LC wheels are 16x8 and not 18x8 like you first typed.
265/70R16 and 265/75R16 are common sizes on the 3rd gen. The size difference between them is pretty minimal.
For the winter set, you might consider the 235/85R16 size. It is about the same diameter as the 265/75R16 but is a good bit narrower to better cut through slush and put down good ground pressure on the snow pack for better grip. Given the same tread pattern and rubber compound, a narrower tire usually has better winter performance than a wider one. Skinny tires also do well on the highway and on the trail--you can run them all year.
AT tires like the SilentArmor and BFG all-terrain are perfectly good for running year-round. Why not simplify and pare down to just one set of rolling stock instead of two? Two sets can be a pain, with the storage, switching, and cost and complexity of keeping two sets of tires balanced and fresh instead of just one. I gave up keeping two sets a long time ago and haven't looked back.
265/70R16 and 265/75R16 are common sizes on the 3rd gen. The size difference between them is pretty minimal.
For the winter set, you might consider the 235/85R16 size. It is about the same diameter as the 265/75R16 but is a good bit narrower to better cut through slush and put down good ground pressure on the snow pack for better grip. Given the same tread pattern and rubber compound, a narrower tire usually has better winter performance than a wider one. Skinny tires also do well on the highway and on the trail--you can run them all year.
AT tires like the SilentArmor and BFG all-terrain are perfectly good for running year-round. Why not simplify and pare down to just one set of rolling stock instead of two? Two sets can be a pain, with the storage, switching, and cost and complexity of keeping two sets of tires balanced and fresh instead of just one. I gave up keeping two sets a long time ago and haven't looked back.
#4
From what I've seen, the snow performance of the Silent Armors and BFG ATs are pretty similar...not different enough to buy two sets.
Here's the survey results table on Tirerack:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/survey....jsp?type=ORAT
The BFG ATs have an 8.6 rating in light snow, 8.3 in deep snow and 7.2 in ice.
The Silent Armors have a 8.8 in light snow, 8.6 in deep snow and 7.8 in ice.
I think it'd be very difficult to justify buying two sets for such similar performance. Both tires are branded with the snowflake symbol, allowing for use without chains in many chain-restricted areas.
If you are set on a different set of winter tires, I would select an actual winter tire.
Here's the survey results table on Tirerack:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/survey....jsp?type=ORAT
The BFG ATs have an 8.6 rating in light snow, 8.3 in deep snow and 7.2 in ice.
The Silent Armors have a 8.8 in light snow, 8.6 in deep snow and 7.8 in ice.
I think it'd be very difficult to justify buying two sets for such similar performance. Both tires are branded with the snowflake symbol, allowing for use without chains in many chain-restricted areas.
If you are set on a different set of winter tires, I would select an actual winter tire.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
justdifferentials
Just Differentials
2
Aug 30, 2015 08:42 PM
justdifferentials
Just Differentials
1
Aug 15, 2015 05:25 PM




