Tires & Wheels Anything about tires and wheels

BFG All Terrain on a 3rd Gen 4runner: Load range?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 06:14 PM
  #21  
cackalak han's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
BFG KO's are an offroad oriented tire. If you're worried about wet weather performance and general on road performance only, they are not the tires for you. But in my experience, Nitto's weren't that great, either. Mich AT and Bridgestone REVO's were much better.

KO's do trump all the other tires mentioned offroad, though.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 07:12 PM
  #22  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
On a daily driver in Colorado you have to consider wet weather performance but I think Nittos offer a good compromise between streetability and off road performance which I never had any issues over 4 years with hitting intermediate trails and mild rock crawling. I thought my Nittos filled the niche between BFGs and a set of Revos or Michelins nicely.

I'm actually giving the new GY Duratracs a try since I wanted something new and they didn't kill my wallet too much.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 07:21 PM
  #23  
Matt16's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by j-man
there is absolutely no reason for anyone with a tacoma to get an E rated tire - thats completly insane. E rated tires would be for a trailer, or a heavy van or dually. C rated is all you need, even D rated is overkill but sometimes its all you can get. No, you wont get any more mileage, just a sore back from the lack of sidewall flex.
There is a reason. Where else are you going to find a 32X9.5" tire? Tire manufacturers don't make enough skinny tires because there isn't enough demand (as they aren't aesthetically appealing to most).
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 06:21 AM
  #24  
cackalak han's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Originally Posted by X-AWDriver
On a daily driver in Colorado you have to consider wet weather performance but I think Nittos offer a good compromise between streetability and off road performance which I never had any issues over 4 years with hitting intermediate trails and mild rock crawling. I thought my Nittos filled the niche between BFGs and a set of Revos or Michelins nicely.

I'm actually giving the new GY Duratracs a try since I wanted something new and they didn't kill my wallet too much.
Well, we're pretty much in the same climate zone. I don't know why NTG's sucked so much for me. I guess maybe it was a bad batch. Subpar on road, off road, snow and rain. REVO's seemed just more planted on road and BFG's were alot better off.

I am also interested in the Duratrac's. You'll have to post up a review when you get them.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 02:42 PM
  #25  
Smallwood0507's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cackalak han
BFG KO's are an offroad oriented tire. If you're worried about wet weather performance and general on road performance only, they are not the tires for you. But in my experience, Nitto's weren't that great, either. Mich AT and Bridgestone REVO's were much better.

KO's do trump all the other tires mentioned offroad, though.
so i also am looking at the mich a/t 2 since ive heard that their great in rain and snow, as well as dry roads, which is where i spend most of my time. But they only come in the p265/70/r16 size their p or passanger. would that be too soft? i do pull a 20' boat every once in a while to the lake thats only 4-5 miles from my house. Also the other choice would be lt265/75/r16 load range E. but id like to stay away form them since E , from the sounds of it, gives too rough of ride.

Last edited by Smallwood0507; Oct 4, 2009 at 03:58 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 10:49 PM
  #26  
The California Kid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: San Carlos, CA
Be careful with those BFG's. I was just looking them up, and it appears that one of the sizes (I believe it was the 265/75R/16 load range E) was NOT rated for severe snow conditions. Check the tire size charts from BFG and verify. Not sure if it's a big deal to you, but just something to think about. Oh, and I think they also make 2 versions of that same size tire. Each has a different speed/load rating.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 04:19 AM
  #27  
HazMat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 478
Likes: 1
From: Mechanicsburg, PA
check out the general grabber AT2. Great in the snow (has snowflake badging) Great in the rain, great on the road, perorm great off road. I'm running 265/75/16s LR E. The ride is not bad at all. Plus they are way cheaper than BF Goodrich Ats. Oh yeah they look great too.
Name:  P2270018.jpg
Views: 1728
Size:  135.0 KB
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 07:36 PM
  #28  
Smallwood0507's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by The California Kid
Be careful with those BFG's. I was just looking them up, and it appears that one of the sizes (I believe it was the 265/75R/16 load range E) was NOT rated for severe snow conditions. Check the tire size charts from BFG and verify. Not sure if it's a big deal to you, but just something to think about. Oh, and I think they also make 2 versions of that same size tire. Each has a different speed/load rating.
Yepp ended up with bfgs and their sweet. (severe snow rated)
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 07:39 PM
  #29  
fattirerider's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: PNW
Originally Posted by Smallwood0507
Yepp ended up with bfgs and their sweet. (severe snow rated)
Were you able to get a load range D? If so what size.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedRunner_87
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
84
Jun 1, 2021 01:51 PM
djpg2000
Tires & Wheels
11
Nov 11, 2020 04:56 AM
crammit442
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
7
Nov 29, 2017 12:30 PM
94ofCanada
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
3
Aug 14, 2015 06:37 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:53 AM.