Even MORE trouble in SoCal
04-04-2007, 08:23 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Encinitas, CA
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even MORE trouble in SoCal
Bio-Diversity and now this!!
Geothermal plants taking over the desert...
Please read
SDORC summary of facts
Geothermal plants taking over the desert...
Please read
SDORC summary of facts
04-04-2007, 09:00 AM
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hannibal, Missouri
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would rather see them building geothermal power plants than fossil fuel power plants. Another plus is that they recognize that the off-highway vehicle recreation is a "sensitive resource".
This is something that needs to be watched and monitored closely.
This is something that needs to be watched and monitored closely.
04-04-2007, 12:27 PM
#3
Contributing Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok, that sucks. I will finish reading the draft provided and send in my comments to BLM or whomever is the appropriate party.
And in regard to the above statement about using water as opposed to oil for power, I agree to a degree. Except when it is put on public land. Eventually there will be so many of us living in cities and no place to go to get away. Luckily we still have quite a bit of open space in SoCal. The real solution: build more nuclear reactors, prabably the cleanest and lowest impact solution around. Maybe hook up the warship reactors to the grid here in SD instead of letting them sit idle...
And in regard to the above statement about using water as opposed to oil for power, I agree to a degree. Except when it is put on public land. Eventually there will be so many of us living in cities and no place to go to get away. Luckily we still have quite a bit of open space in SoCal. The real solution: build more nuclear reactors, prabably the cleanest and lowest impact solution around. Maybe hook up the warship reactors to the grid here in SD instead of letting them sit idle...
04-16-2007, 09:25 AM
#4
Registered User
One more reason to runa 4 banger with moderate exhaust. They pick on noise levels on page 3-7, 3-8.
They're always looking for anything to make us look bad.
Trash, noise, tearing up terrain, probably the 3 biggest reasons we give people like this a chance to stop us.
They're always looking for anything to make us look bad.
Trash, noise, tearing up terrain, probably the 3 biggest reasons we give people like this a chance to stop us.
05-02-2007, 01:38 PM
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok, that sucks. I will finish reading the draft provided and send in my comments to BLM or whomever is the appropriate party.
And in regard to the above statement about using water as opposed to oil for power, I agree to a degree. Except when it is put on public land. Eventually there will be so many of us living in cities and no place to go to get away. Luckily we still have quite a bit of open space in SoCal. The real solution: build more nuclear reactors, prabably the cleanest and lowest impact solution around. Maybe hook up the warship reactors to the grid here in SD instead of letting them sit idle...
And in regard to the above statement about using water as opposed to oil for power, I agree to a degree. Except when it is put on public land. Eventually there will be so many of us living in cities and no place to go to get away. Luckily we still have quite a bit of open space in SoCal. The real solution: build more nuclear reactors, prabably the cleanest and lowest impact solution around. Maybe hook up the warship reactors to the grid here in SD instead of letting them sit idle...
+1
I am all for Nuclear reactors. VERY clean energy.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
primordialbeast117
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
11
12-19-2015 12:23 PM
