Land Usage & Off Road Responsibility Discussion pertaining to the education of proper land usage, closures, and responsible off road driving

Even MORE trouble in SoCal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 08:23 AM
  #1  
Phalanx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: Encinitas, CA
Even MORE trouble in SoCal

Bio-Diversity and now this!!
Geothermal plants taking over the desert...
Please read

SDORC summary of facts
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 09:00 AM
  #2  
MoSun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Hannibal, Missouri
I would rather see them building geothermal power plants than fossil fuel power plants. Another plus is that they recognize that the off-highway vehicle recreation is a "sensitive resource".
This is something that needs to be watched and monitored closely.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 12:27 PM
  #3  
spaugh's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
ok, that sucks. I will finish reading the draft provided and send in my comments to BLM or whomever is the appropriate party.

And in regard to the above statement about using water as opposed to oil for power, I agree to a degree. Except when it is put on public land. Eventually there will be so many of us living in cities and no place to go to get away. Luckily we still have quite a bit of open space in SoCal. The real solution: build more nuclear reactors, prabably the cleanest and lowest impact solution around. Maybe hook up the warship reactors to the grid here in SD instead of letting them sit idle...
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 09:25 AM
  #4  
deathrunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,969
Likes: 1
From: San Diego CA
One more reason to runa 4 banger with moderate exhaust. They pick on noise levels on page 3-7, 3-8.

They're always looking for anything to make us look bad.

Trash, noise, tearing up terrain, probably the 3 biggest reasons we give people like this a chance to stop us.
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 01:38 PM
  #5  
Man4God's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by spaugh
ok, that sucks. I will finish reading the draft provided and send in my comments to BLM or whomever is the appropriate party.

And in regard to the above statement about using water as opposed to oil for power, I agree to a degree. Except when it is put on public land. Eventually there will be so many of us living in cities and no place to go to get away. Luckily we still have quite a bit of open space in SoCal. The real solution: build more nuclear reactors, prabably the cleanest and lowest impact solution around. Maybe hook up the warship reactors to the grid here in SD instead of letting them sit idle...

+1

I am all for Nuclear reactors. VERY clean energy.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
primordialbeast117
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
11
Dec 19, 2015 12:23 PM
Gravel Maker
RuffStuff
2
Oct 4, 2015 10:26 AM
voiddweller
Newbie Tech Section
4
Oct 2, 2015 07:47 AM
Matthew Perez
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
9
Sep 28, 2015 05:43 PM
128keaton
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
6
Sep 3, 2015 05:09 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:34 PM.