This is what happens when you buy skyjacker springs...
#21
Is it me, or is there a lift block under the springs? Take a look at the pinion angle too. No way to get that angle without a severe degree shim.
But, its not a Skyjacker issue anyway. The springs bent because they were allowed to negative arch on a regular basis.
But, its not a Skyjacker issue anyway. The springs bent because they were allowed to negative arch on a regular basis.
#22
Good eye! I'm seeing that too now(@400% zoom) It's pretty clear there is a block under them.

Can you say AXLE WRAP CITY? What a dumbass!
They don't look angled to me. But he likely clocked the perches to get that pinion angle.
Can you say AXLE WRAP CITY? What a dumbass!

They don't look angled to me. But he likely clocked the perches to get that pinion angle.
#27
#28
The following questions will be rated for sillyness and/or irrelevance by prescribing them a number ranging from 1 to 4. #1 being the most silly and/or irrelevant, #4 being the least.
#1
#2
#3
#4
It was a tough call to make between #1 and #2. #1 just happens to not be factual and therefor has no relevance at all. #2 is just outright silly, but could be relevant, though it's extremely unlikely to be. So that's how I made that decision. Based on the fact #1 can't be true, making it the most silly and irrelevant. And #2 being equally silly, but having an infinitely small possibility of having any relevance. #3 and #4 were easy.
Answers to the questions are as follows:
#1: They aren't upside down or in the wrong position. Are you serious? How else could they be fitted? Think about it.
#2: Oh...I highly doubt that could be achieved or that it could possibly make even the slightest difference it were to be. Meaning...it wouldn't hold the blocks in place any better necessarily nor would it effect the springs in a negative manner if the bolts were a little tighter than specs. It could very well damage the blocks though.(Ask me how I know...better yet don't...I hate talking about that fiasco
)
#3: Hmmm...possibly they don't make them like they used to, BUT definitely they don't like to "go negative". Springs aren't meant to do that EVER!
#4: You're just being silly, but relevant. And you know it.
#1
#2
It was a tough call to make between #1 and #2. #1 just happens to not be factual and therefor has no relevance at all. #2 is just outright silly, but could be relevant, though it's extremely unlikely to be. So that's how I made that decision. Based on the fact #1 can't be true, making it the most silly and irrelevant. And #2 being equally silly, but having an infinitely small possibility of having any relevance. #3 and #4 were easy.
Answers to the questions are as follows:
#1: They aren't upside down or in the wrong position. Are you serious? How else could they be fitted? Think about it.
#2: Oh...I highly doubt that could be achieved or that it could possibly make even the slightest difference it were to be. Meaning...it wouldn't hold the blocks in place any better necessarily nor would it effect the springs in a negative manner if the bolts were a little tighter than specs. It could very well damage the blocks though.(Ask me how I know...better yet don't...I hate talking about that fiasco
)#3: Hmmm...possibly they don't make them like they used to, BUT definitely they don't like to "go negative". Springs aren't meant to do that EVER!
#4: You're just being silly, but relevant. And you know it.
Last edited by MudHippy; Sep 13, 2010 at 06:45 PM.
#32
#33
I'm glad Mudhippy took me seriously LOL 
my sense of humour was a lil off i guess but just seemed to fit after reading all the previous posts. Might as well be rediculous

my sense of humour was a lil off i guess but just seemed to fit after reading all the previous posts. Might as well be rediculous
Last edited by drew303; Sep 14, 2010 at 02:25 AM.
#34
I'm glad I am not the only one who sees it that way. I understand what DC was saying though about not seeing half the shackle, but that don't look like dirt between the shackle and the frame to me.
#37
K. I talked to my buddy today and Im goin out there tomorrow to help him put a body lift on his truck. BUT I asked him some questions
1. He said that is how the springs were shipped to him, he hasnt removed any leafs and no overload springs came on it(its the front).
2. That shackle is not welded to the frame and it can move, the picture just makes it look that way, ill take more pics when I go out there tomorrow.
3. That isnt a block its a shim to help his drive shaft angle.
and 4. Those u-bolts are on there right, he would know because they have 3 of those trucks out there at thier house.
Let me know if there are any specefic picture request for me to take tomorrow. Ill try to take a bunch.
1. He said that is how the springs were shipped to him, he hasnt removed any leafs and no overload springs came on it(its the front).
2. That shackle is not welded to the frame and it can move, the picture just makes it look that way, ill take more pics when I go out there tomorrow.
3. That isnt a block its a shim to help his drive shaft angle.
and 4. Those u-bolts are on there right, he would know because they have 3 of those trucks out there at thier house.
Let me know if there are any specefic picture request for me to take tomorrow. Ill try to take a bunch.
#38
I know the u-bolts are on there correctly, LoL I was just pokn fun at all the accusations that the shackles are welded (I can clearly see its a stock shackle on stock solid front rig) ... bad humour i suppose
i thought it was obvious
i thought it was obvious
#39
if it doesnt have T Bars...CANK EM ANYWAY!!! was simply makin light of a silly concept. If you dont watch it... ill put t bars on your truck and crank the crap out of em!!




