General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related) If topic doesn't apply to Toyotas whatsoever, it should be in Off Topic
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

This is what happens when you buy skyjacker springs...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 12, 2010 | 08:20 PM
  #21  
ScottyC's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,477
Likes: 0
From: Ft Collins, CO
Is it me, or is there a lift block under the springs? Take a look at the pinion angle too. No way to get that angle without a severe degree shim.

But, its not a Skyjacker issue anyway. The springs bent because they were allowed to negative arch on a regular basis.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2010 | 08:32 PM
  #22  
MudHippy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 27
Good eye! I'm seeing that too now(@400% zoom) It's pretty clear there is a block under them.


Can you say AXLE WRAP CITY? What a dumbass!

They don't look angled to me. But he likely clocked the perches to get that pinion angle.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2010 | 08:35 PM
  #23  
Teuf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,592
Likes: 24
From: Dixon, Ca
Little, more like a lot. I thought they were kinda Verboten on the rear even. But on the front, Oy
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2010 | 10:21 PM
  #24  
drew303's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 2
From: Olympia, WA
why are the U-BOLTS upside down and parallel with the axle????
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2010 | 10:34 PM
  #25  
dropzone's Avatar
Fossilized
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 19,771
Likes: 456
From: PNW
Originally Posted by drew303
why are the U-BOLTS upside down and parallel with the axle????
so he can buy a u-bolt flip kit later on
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 02:49 PM
  #26  
E-ROC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
From: Hemet, CA.
im sure overtightened u-bolts (ya know, for fear of kicking out the blocks) would add to the problem also.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 05:13 PM
  #27  
TOYOTA 1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 3
From: oregon
Originally Posted by ScottyC
Is it me, or is there a lift block under the springs? Take a look at the pinion angle too. No way to get that angle without a severe degree shim.

But, its not a Skyjacker issue anyway. The springs bent because they were allowed to negative arch on a regular basis.
they just don't make them like they used to, cause my ruf's love to go negative
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 06:38 PM
  #28  
MudHippy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 27
The following questions will be rated for sillyness and/or irrelevance by prescribing them a number ranging from 1 to 4. #1 being the most silly and/or irrelevant, #4 being the least.

#1
Originally Posted by drew303
why are the U-BOLTS upside down and parallel with the axle????
#2
Originally Posted by E-ROC
im sure overtightened u-bolts (ya know, for fear of kicking out the blocks) would add to the problem also.
#3
Originally Posted by TOYOTA 1
they just don't make them like they used to, cause my ruf's love to go negative
#4
Originally Posted by ocdropzone
so he can buy a u-bolt flip kit later on
It was a tough call to make between #1 and #2. #1 just happens to not be factual and therefor has no relevance at all. #2 is just outright silly, but could be relevant, though it's extremely unlikely to be. So that's how I made that decision. Based on the fact #1 can't be true, making it the most silly and irrelevant. And #2 being equally silly, but having an infinitely small possibility of having any relevance. #3 and #4 were easy.

Answers to the questions are as follows:

#1: They aren't upside down or in the wrong position. Are you serious? How else could they be fitted? Think about it.

#2: Oh...I highly doubt that could be achieved or that it could possibly make even the slightest difference it were to be. Meaning...it wouldn't hold the blocks in place any better necessarily nor would it effect the springs in a negative manner if the bolts were a little tighter than specs. It could very well damage the blocks though.(Ask me how I know...better yet don't...I hate talking about that fiasco)

#3: Hmmm...possibly they don't make them like they used to, BUT definitely they don't like to "go negative". Springs aren't meant to do that EVER!

#4: You're just being silly, but relevant. And you know it.

Last edited by MudHippy; Sep 13, 2010 at 06:45 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 07:36 PM
  #29  
TOYOTA 1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 3
From: oregon
really??

thanks for clearing that up hippy
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 07:47 PM
  #30  
MudHippy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 27
Yep!

Really.

No not really...but in the direction this thread is headed...why not? Might as well I thought.

Pretty irrelevant too actually.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 08:02 PM
  #31  
TOYOTA 1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 3
From: oregon
haha, its all good!
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 08:07 PM
  #32  
2DoorRunner's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,743
Likes: 2
From: Brier, Washington
Originally Posted by xxxtreme22r
man to me now that I am looking at that shackle, it looks like that shackle is not a shackle at all and its a half a shackle welded to the frame too. Also it doesn't look like there is that body mount even there.
If you zoom in on that spot it looks like it IS welded to the frame. So i think you may be right
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 02:24 AM
  #33  
drew303's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 2
From: Olympia, WA
I'm glad Mudhippy took me seriously LOL

my sense of humour was a lil off i guess but just seemed to fit after reading all the previous posts. Might as well be rediculous

Last edited by drew303; Sep 14, 2010 at 02:25 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 03:46 AM
  #34  
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 13,574
Likes: 72
From: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
Originally Posted by 2DoorRunner
If you zoom in on that spot it looks like it IS welded to the frame. So i think you may be right

I'm glad I am not the only one who sees it that way. I understand what DC was saying though about not seeing half the shackle, but that don't look like dirt between the shackle and the frame to me.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 04:14 AM
  #35  
clydehatchet's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: KY
it appears that a skyjacker lift kit simply turned into a universal skyjacker block and ubolts bought at any parts house. the ideal lift kit is the blocks and CRANK the t-bars.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 05:01 AM
  #36  
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 13,574
Likes: 72
From: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
I am dead set against blocks. I think the ideal lift kit would be 4 leaf springs and no blocks whatsoever.

no t-bars on this one there clyde.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 05:08 PM
  #37  
MegaManX268's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Little Rock, AR
K. I talked to my buddy today and Im goin out there tomorrow to help him put a body lift on his truck. BUT I asked him some questions

1. He said that is how the springs were shipped to him, he hasnt removed any leafs and no overload springs came on it(its the front).

2. That shackle is not welded to the frame and it can move, the picture just makes it look that way, ill take more pics when I go out there tomorrow.

3. That isnt a block its a shim to help his drive shaft angle.

and 4. Those u-bolts are on there right, he would know because they have 3 of those trucks out there at thier house.

Let me know if there are any specefic picture request for me to take tomorrow. Ill try to take a bunch.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 01:59 AM
  #38  
drew303's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 2
From: Olympia, WA
I know the u-bolts are on there correctly, LoL I was just pokn fun at all the accusations that the shackles are welded (I can clearly see its a stock shackle on stock solid front rig) ... bad humour i suppose

i thought it was obvious
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 03:33 AM
  #39  
clydehatchet's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: KY
Originally Posted by xxxtreme22r
I am dead set against blocks. I think the ideal lift kit would be 4 leaf springs and no blocks whatsoever.

no t-bars on this one there clyde.
... if it doesnt have T Bars...CANK EM ANYWAY!!!

was simply makin light of a silly concept. If you dont watch it... ill put t bars on your truck and crank the crap out of em!!
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 10:08 PM
  #40  
E-ROC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
From: Hemet, CA.
ok. so my sense of humor is a little dry.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:04 PM.