General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related) If topic doesn't apply to Toyotas whatsoever, it should be in Off Topic
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ethanol

Old Mar 26, 2008 | 09:06 AM
  #41  
mjwalfredo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, SC
Originally Posted by WSUWESTON
I read a journal awhile ago regarding the total use of energy through the life of a hummer vs. a prius. When you take into acount the process to build, drive and dispose of the hummer is better for the enviroment. I believe it was an university that did the research, I just can't remember which one.
You can't remember because CNW Marketing conducted the study and it wasn't a very good one either.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 09:36 AM
  #42  
infiltrator's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 3
From: Valencia, California
Originally Posted by mr_schuster
Just think thats the "average battery", I remember when the the first Prius rolled out and had their battery issues, we had to replace a few here and there at a cost of around $5000, (This was warranty work of course)

Compare two cars side by side the Honda Civic and the Honda Civic Hybrid.
http://automobiles.honda.com/civic-hybrid/
http://automobiles.honda.com/civic-sedan/

The hybrid Civics cost 22,600 and the regular Civic costs 15,010.
The hybrid gets 45 MPG ( which is BS so do some of the new fords )
The regular Civic gets 36 MPG
A big 9MPG fuel difference between the two cars and a price tag difference of $7590. (and to think the govnerment is giving tax breaks to the people who buy these "green" cars. Shame on them.

So, 1 gallon of fuel in NC is $3.30 right now, if I purchase the regular Civic and pocket the $7590 difference between the cars I can purchase 2300 gallons of fuel. 2300 gallons of fuel at 36 MPG I can drive 82,800 miles. This is given that fuel prices remain constant and I drive on the interstate all day.
The average person puts 12000 to 15000 miles a year on a car. Lets average that for everyone at 13,500 miles. I can drive this regular Civic on that $7590 price tag difference for a little over six years. Most people, I am guessing here, would sell there vehicle at either 100,000 miles, between and 8 and 10 years of ownership or after the warranty expires.

The Hybrid has longer wait times for repairs, because only factory certified hybrid techs are allowed to work on these. These technicians are not exactly by the dozens in the dealerships. Alot of the technology is new and technicians will take longer to diagnose these hybrid related problems as they try to familiarize themselves with the technology. Parts availability I am not so sure about, so I can't comment on that. As for Hybrid batteries, just look at the cost of replacement if it failes outside of Hondas 5/60000 mile warranty. If I owned the Honda hybrid or Toyotas Prius I would get rid of it before the expiration of the warranty.

Now go buy some gas for your 5.7L Tundra...
Can I get an A-men.
Im beginning to like you Schuster lol.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 09:42 AM
  #43  
mjwalfredo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, SC
That's exactly why I bought the non-hibrid version of the civic last year.

You can't beat 36 mpg on a car that won't likely need many repairs and when it does, pretty much anyone can work on it. Myself included!
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 10:14 AM
  #44  
fishon1213's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Milan, IL
Originally Posted by stormin94
If all this is true, then Hydrogen is our only hope, if not, I guess it's back to burnin whale oil.

I am pretty sure the hydrogen is derived from burning fossil fuels, not to mention the hydrogen vehicles cost 5x and normal car and the motors don't last. Hydrogen is not the answer. Hydrogen is the rabbit racing around the track and we are the greyhounds. Ethanol is just plain inefficient. I just read up on a producing oil from algae farms, and the algae can digest chemical waste! Check out oilgae.com. Also there is a documentory out called "Who Killed the Electric Car". It talks about the EV1 that GM produced a few years back, until exxon bought the rights to the technology GM was using and wouldn't let them put the cars into production. They wouldn't go very fast and you couldn't haul a bunch of passengers around but you could plug them into a regular wall outlet to charge them and get from A to B. I don't generally care for General Motors but if I could go to the dealership and buy an EV1 I would go as soon as I finish this sentence.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 10:31 AM
  #45  
mr_schuster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by fishon1213
I am pretty sure the hydrogen is derived from burning fossil fuels, not to mention the hydrogen vehicles cost 5x and normal car and the motors don't last. Hydrogen is not the answer. Hydrogen is the rabbit racing around the track and we are the greyhounds. Ethanol is just plain inefficient. I just read up on a producing oil from algae farms, and the algae can digest chemical waste! Check out oilgae.com. Also there is a documentory out called "Who Killed the Electric Car". It talks about the EV1 that GM produced a few years back, until exxon bought the rights to the technology GM was using and wouldn't let them put the cars into production. They wouldn't go very fast and you couldn't haul a bunch of passengers around but you could plug them into a regular wall outlet to charge them and get from A to B. I don't generally care for General Motors but if I could go to the dealership and buy an EV1 I would go as soon as I finish this sentence.

You are correct... Hydrogen is made by "steam vaporization particle blasting of Methane nebulization" It's a fairly cheap process.

Just kidding there, but seriously, if you care to know how hydrogen is produced from methane then check out this article at CNN. It explains the process a little bit as well as how crappy a fuel it is when not used from a fuel cell ( KaBoom ). Short article and interesting.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science...ydrogen.buses/

About the electric car, thats just crazy. Don't quote me on this.. After the oil companies bought the rights to the technology it was infact the fed's who kept it from production. Oil companies were scared that the car was going to damage their industry.

The show on algae was really interesting, but seems a long way off.

Last edited by mr_schuster; Mar 26, 2008 at 10:38 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 10:51 PM
  #46  
stormin94's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 4
From: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
Well, the first cars were powered by horses, then the next ones were powered by steam. It will take some more years of research and developement before the pipe dream of hydrogen powered cars even becomes feasible.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kawazx636
Engines - Transmissions
1
Sep 29, 2015 08:22 AM
nonstop
Newbie Tech Section
3
Jul 24, 2015 06:29 PM
RSR
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
17
Nov 14, 2014 06:24 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:04 AM.