Banner Picture submissions
#1
Banner Picture submissions
If you would like your rig featured in our new banner created by WATRD and Calrockx, here is what you need to know.
1. Pictures must be sized at 133x100
2. Less than 10 kb each
3. And a maximum of 3 pictures.
4. name pictures username1.jpg, username2.jpg, ect...
5. JPG files only, no GIFs.
Current pictures up now I will rename to new format tomorrow, but not future ones.
Please name them correctly.
Pics sized wrong or to high in kb will be rejected.
I can not reply to the emails or fix your pictures for you.
Submit them to c.tando at comcast dot net
No longer using the YT addy.
Fix the email address above to reflect the true address.
It is done this way to prevent email bot harvesters from sending me more nasty spam
1. Pictures must be sized at 133x100
2. Less than 10 kb each
3. And a maximum of 3 pictures.
4. name pictures username1.jpg, username2.jpg, ect...
5. JPG files only, no GIFs.
Current pictures up now I will rename to new format tomorrow, but not future ones.
Please name them correctly.
Pics sized wrong or to high in kb will be rejected.
I can not reply to the emails or fix your pictures for you.
Submit them to c.tando at comcast dot net
No longer using the YT addy.
Fix the email address above to reflect the true address.
It is done this way to prevent email bot harvesters from sending me more nasty spam
#2
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Corey had indeed been busy for us! Thank You!
I have one suggestion though. Could the WATRD/CalrocksX duo code a loop that will check the banner so that:
a) two images don't appear twice?
b) maybe even have it read file names (which would include a username) so that it doesn't show two images of the same user at the same time.
It would definately be some work, but I believe it would be worth it, some might disagree. I am available for any help!
EDIT on that: Maybe it's completely unnecessary, becuase as more pix are added, chances of the same showing decrease. I'll just keep the ideas up just in case.
Now to the good stuff!
IMAGE RESIZING
I have just submitted an imagine of my own truck, and I have noticed that if you are resizing from a digital image taken by a camera, getting the filesize right is not easy business sometimes.
Therefore, since I know many people don't have photoshop, I am willing to resize images for people so that they could submit it to Corey.
The way it would work is that you send me your original image to MARKO3XL3 AT GMAIL DOT COM (format to work, of course) as an attachment with the filename being in the same format as Corey's: "username1.jpg", "username2.jpg", "username3.jpg". The exception would be if your username ends in a number. Then, please use the following scheme: "username_1.jpg","username_2.jpg","username_3.jpg" .
I will convert the image to meet req's and then send it back to YOU (e-mail you sent it from) so that you can then e-mail it to Corey.
No, I am not in some kind of image stealing business, I am just doing this on my own time to help people on this board. Really, hehe! Let's get this banner started!
I have one suggestion though. Could the WATRD/CalrocksX duo code a loop that will check the banner so that:
a) two images don't appear twice?
b) maybe even have it read file names (which would include a username) so that it doesn't show two images of the same user at the same time.
It would definately be some work, but I believe it would be worth it, some might disagree. I am available for any help!
EDIT on that: Maybe it's completely unnecessary, becuase as more pix are added, chances of the same showing decrease. I'll just keep the ideas up just in case.
Now to the good stuff!
IMAGE RESIZING
I have just submitted an imagine of my own truck, and I have noticed that if you are resizing from a digital image taken by a camera, getting the filesize right is not easy business sometimes.
Therefore, since I know many people don't have photoshop, I am willing to resize images for people so that they could submit it to Corey.
The way it would work is that you send me your original image to MARKO3XL3 AT GMAIL DOT COM (format to work, of course) as an attachment with the filename being in the same format as Corey's: "username1.jpg", "username2.jpg", "username3.jpg". The exception would be if your username ends in a number. Then, please use the following scheme: "username_1.jpg","username_2.jpg","username_3.jpg" .
I will convert the image to meet req's and then send it back to YOU (e-mail you sent it from) so that you can then e-mail it to Corey.
No, I am not in some kind of image stealing business, I am just doing this on my own time to help people on this board. Really, hehe! Let's get this banner started!
Last edited by marko3xl3; 01-06-2006 at 09:28 PM.
#4
Contributing Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by marko3xl3
I have one suggestion though. Could the WATRD/CalrocksX duo code a loop that will check the banner so that:
a) two images don't appear twice?
b) maybe even have it read file names (which would include a username) so that it doesn't show two images of the same user at the same time.
It would definately be some work, but I believe it would be worth it, some might disagree. I am available for any help!
EDIT on that: Maybe it's completely unnecessary, becuase as more pix are added, chances of the same showing decrease. I'll just keep the ideas up just in case.
a) two images don't appear twice?
b) maybe even have it read file names (which would include a username) so that it doesn't show two images of the same user at the same time.
It would definately be some work, but I believe it would be worth it, some might disagree. I am available for any help!
EDIT on that: Maybe it's completely unnecessary, becuase as more pix are added, chances of the same showing decrease. I'll just keep the ideas up just in case.
#5
A reminder
Read above what the pics should be named, or I will trash 'em.
I will rename the current ones in rotation tomorrow.
It is easier to have them named the way I have it above for maintaining them.
The ones that are coming up double now are doing this until I rename them tomorrow.
All in goodtime, time for bed
Read above what the pics should be named, or I will trash 'em.
I will rename the current ones in rotation tomorrow.
It is easier to have them named the way I have it above for maintaining them.
The ones that are coming up double now are doing this until I rename them tomorrow.
All in goodtime, time for bed
#6
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by WATRD
I can and will add logic to weed out duplicate images if it still seems to be needed after the pool of images gets a bit bigger. I didn't do it originally because, as you mentioned, the problem will be less as the pool grows in size. I hate to make the code any more complex than it needs to be if the problem is going to go away on it's own.
One more thing. In the other thread you mentioned that images should be kept to .jpg for simplicity. Well, with a 10kb size limit, that's next to impossible. You'd have to use .gif. The quality downgrade won't be noticable as it is a small image.
Trending Topics
#8
Contributing Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by marko3xl3
One more thing. In the other thread you mentioned that images should be kept to .jpg for simplicity. Well, with a 10kb size limit, that's next to impossible. You'd have to use .gif. The quality downgrade won't be noticable as it is a small image.
In theory, .gif files will work, but I have not tested it. Of course the color depth of .gif files can be pretty bad.
I recommend sticking with .jpg files, since that is what the script outputs anyway.
#9
Contributing Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay, I just tested it. It DOES NOT render .gif files. I am not sure why, but I am not going to put a lot of work into it unless Corey requires it.
So, that means .jpg images ONLY.
And, BTW, I just converted a 9.7k .jpg file to .gif and it ended up at 12.3k .jpg is the way to go.
So, that means .jpg images ONLY.
And, BTW, I just converted a 9.7k .jpg file to .gif and it ended up at 12.3k .jpg is the way to go.
#12
Registered User
Originally Posted by WATRD
And, BTW, I just converted a 9.7k .jpg file to .gif and it ended up at 12.3k .jpg is the way to go.
#13
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by WATRD
Okay, I just tested it. It DOES NOT render .gif files. I am not sure why, but I am not going to put a lot of work into it unless Corey requires it.
So, that means .jpg images ONLY.
And, BTW, I just converted a 9.7k .jpg file to .gif and it ended up at 12.3k .jpg is the way to go.
So, that means .jpg images ONLY.
And, BTW, I just converted a 9.7k .jpg file to .gif and it ended up at 12.3k .jpg is the way to go.
My offer above still stands though. If anyone needs resizing, see above.
#14
Sponsor
Originally Posted by tulsa_97SR5
So, no more reading posts for me. Just sitting here, hitting f5, looking at the pretty banner. I'll be here if you need me.
it took alot of f5's to do that
Last edited by ToferUOP; 01-06-2006 at 10:56 PM.
#15
Registered User
Originally Posted by ToferUOP
...it took alot of f5's to do that
https://www.yotatech.com/banner/banner.php
#16
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Santa Clarita, California
Posts: 4,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ToferUOP
fewww i thought i was the only one... who did that.. i try to see how many itmes i can get my truck to show up on 1 banner
it took alot of f5's to do that
it took alot of f5's to do that
hmm, so it's not just me. the centerpiece isn't showing up as:
#17
Registered User
Originally Posted by calrockx
hmm, so it's not just me. the centerpiece isn't showing up as:
Is the script pointing right? or is there a server cache that's messing with ya'? did ya' try changing the name of the centerpiece?