03+ 4Runner/GX470, & 05+ Tacomas 4th gen 4Runners & 5th gen trucks

V8 Option in Future 4Runners?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2011, 03:46 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
andrewmitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V8 Option in Future 4Runners?

Does anyone know if Toyota has plans on bringing the V8 option back to future 4Runners?
Old 11-02-2011, 04:43 AM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
bob200587's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,546
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I hope not.
Old 11-02-2011, 07:04 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
dmwahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why not? It would be kind of fun to cram a 5.7L V8 into a 4Runner...
Old 11-02-2011, 07:53 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
punkelberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3oV4...eature=related
Old 11-07-2011, 07:47 PM
  #5  
Contributing Member
 
arjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mission, British Columbia
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If anything, it would be the 4.6.

I'll stick with my 06. I really enjoy the V8.
Old 02-07-2012, 08:56 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
andrewmitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did the 4Runner ever have the 4.6?
Old 02-07-2012, 09:12 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
MaK92-4RnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 6,059
Received 101 Likes on 79 Posts
I'd love a fuel efficient V8. but honestly? I could careless for the "motor". I'd rather see a SMALLER 4runner. 4th and 5th gens are practically worthless in terms of wheeling in the wilderness... they basically are restrained to fire roads, and even then, they get a little tight on some trails.

so all in all. i'm all for a smaller 4Runner, maybe some redesign, and a powerful v6.
Old 02-07-2012, 10:22 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Leviticus6432's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 4.0 v6 is a freaking beast! they would have to bring something small and light like that 1uzfe to make me happy with a v8.
Old 02-07-2012, 10:33 AM
  #9  
Contributing Member
 
bob200587's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,546
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MaK92-4RnR
I'd love a fuel efficient V8. but honestly? I could careless for the "motor". I'd rather see a SMALLER 4runner. 4th and 5th gens are practically worthless in terms of wheeling in the wilderness... they basically are restrained to fire roads, and even then, they get a little tight on some trails.

so all in all. i'm all for a smaller 4Runner, maybe some redesign, and a powerful v6.
Americans are too fat to fit in smaller vehicles. They'll never go back to narrower trucks.
Old 02-07-2012, 10:38 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
MaK92-4RnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 6,059
Received 101 Likes on 79 Posts
Originally Posted by bob200587
Americans are too fat to fit in smaller vehicles. They'll never go back to narrower trucks.
sad but true, unfortunately. haha
Old 02-07-2012, 10:45 AM
  #11  
Contributing Member
 
bob200587's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,546
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MaK92-4RnR
sad but true, unfortunately. haha
I've had a fattie ride shotgun with me before and he spilled over the console and actually was taking up some of my space in the driver's seat.

It was then I realized how small my 4runner was.
Old 02-07-2012, 11:01 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
MaK92-4RnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 6,059
Received 101 Likes on 79 Posts
lmfao thats terrible! yeah. Im not exactly "skinny" ( about 20 lbs over weight ) and im 6'. I find my 4Runner extremely comfy, I actually prefer it more than domestic vehicles. its awkward talking to the person sitting next to you when they're like 2-3 feet away. hahaha
Old 02-07-2012, 12:58 PM
  #13  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
stockwell45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sonora, CA
Posts: 1,144
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Id just be happy with a Landcruiser 70 with the diesel V8 that they have everywhere else.

Mike, saying you are fat is like saying obama is white.
Old 02-07-2012, 01:05 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Leviticus6432's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree a landcruiser 70 over here would be ballin
Old 02-12-2012, 05:48 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Dagosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct me if I'm wrong, but presently the Jeep Grand Cherokee is the primary competition that offers a much high towing capacity then the 4runner. It could happen if the demand is there. My feeling....if you want to tow 7.5 k, you are better off with a heavier Sequia then just more power from an 8 in lighter mid size. I would just rather see a more powerful hybrid, like the Hylander offers that gives you both, better acceleration and a little better mileage.

But stream fording with all those added electrics would give me pause..second thought, bring on the 8.

Btw, they do make a "smaller " 4 Runner. It's call an FJ.

Last edited by Dagosa; 02-13-2012 at 03:57 AM.
Old 02-21-2012, 08:50 AM
  #16  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
andrewmitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about the 4.6 in the Taco??
Old 02-21-2012, 01:17 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Dagosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMO, the biggest competition for the Tundra is the Tacoma. Offering a v8 in either the 4runner or the Tundra, puts them again in direct competition with the Sequoia and Tundra for those at the entry level in the larger vehicles. Car makers want them to move up from lower priced vehicles to more expensive and bigger. The Tacoma and 4Runner have gotten pretty big.....maybe too big for their own good. IMO, one of the reasons that the new 4runner has gone more back to it's roots, was it's direct competition with the Highlander. To heck with the 4.6 idea and give me a stout little diesel.

Last edited by Dagosa; 02-21-2012 at 01:20 PM.
Old 02-21-2012, 01:36 PM
  #18  
Contributing Member
 
Fink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't see them doing this.

I think the 4.0L is just fine for the class that the 4Runner is in. If you need more than that, why not get a Sequoia?

Fink
Old 02-21-2012, 03:48 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
ThatGuy1295's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 46 50' 36.82'' N 122 19' 41.01'' W
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
IF the 4.6 really does get 20mpg like they say it does, then why not? More power same milage is fine. Just not a little bit more power with way less mpg's. That sucks...

Ford eco boost? they misspelled it, "it ego boost" idiots..
Old 02-21-2012, 05:13 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
GenXr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V8 4Runner? It's gone the way of the dodo bird my friend. The earth is now flat. Hang on to what you have, because everything under 9 passengers will be unibody by the end of the decade.

You can kiss your two speed transfer cases good bye also as well as differential traction aides.


Quick Reply: V8 Option in Future 4Runners?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:01 PM.